Skip to main content
Log in

The interfacial fracture characteristics of bimaterial and sandwich blister specimens

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interfacial crack initiation characteristics of bimaterial and sandwich strip blister specimens were compared. Interface cracks were grown along glass/epoxy interfaces and the corresponding loads, normal crack opening displacements (NCOD) and crack front geometries were measured. Finite element analyses were used to compare NCOD, extract fracture parameters and examine near front stress fields. On the small scale of crack extension that could be measured, the bimaterial specimens exhibited resistance curve behavior whereas none could be resolved in the sandwich specimens. The phase angle dependence of toughness in the bimaterial specimens was similar to that obtained in previous blister tests but was much steeper than has otherwise been measured. The toughness of the glass/epoxy interface in the sandwich specimen decreased with decreasing epoxy thickness in spite of the fact that it was never completely spanned by plastic zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.D.Bascom, R.L.Cottington, R.L.Jones and P.Peyser, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 19 (1975) 2545–2562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D.L.Hunston, J.L.Bitner, J.L.Rushford, J.Oroshnik and W.S.Rose, Journal of Elastomers and Plastics 12 (1980) 133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.J.Kinloch and S.J.Shaw, Journal of Adhesion 12 (1981) 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Chai, in Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Seventh Conference), ASTM STP 893 (1986) 209–231.

  5. H.Chai, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 24 (1986) 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H.Chai, International Journal of Fracture 37 (1988) 137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.A.Zdaniewski, J.C.ConwayJr. and H.P.Kirchner, Journal of the American Ceramics Society 70 (1987) 110–118.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.S.Wang, J. F.Mandell and F.J.McGarry, International Journal of Fracture 14 (1978) 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.H. Crews, Jr., K.N. Shivakumar and I.S. Raju, in Adhesively Bonded Joints: Testing Analysis and Design, ASTM STP 981 (1988) 119–132.

  10. P.D. Mangalgiri, W.S. Johnson, and R.A. Everett, Jr., in Adhesion International (1987) 725–750.

  11. N.A.Fleck, J.W.Hutchinson and Z.Suo, International Journal of Solids and Structures 27 (1991) 1683–1703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J.M. Scott and D.C. Phillips, Journal of Materials Science (1975) 551–562.

  13. Z.Suo and J.W.Hutchinson, Materials Science and Engineering A107 (1989) 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J.S.Wang and Z.Suo, Acta Metallurgica 38 (1990) 1279–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L.G. Rosenfeld, J.E. Ritter, T.J. Lardner and M.R. Lin, Journal of Applied Physics, in press.

  16. K.M.Liechti and W.G.Knauss, Experimental Mechanics 22 (1982) 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K.M.Liehti and E.C.Hanson, International Journal of Fracture 36 (1988) 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K.M. Liechti and Y-S. Chai, Journal of Applied Mechanics, in press.

  19. Y-M. Liang, The Effect of Elastic Constraint on the Interfacial Toughness of Layered Media, Report EMRL 89/5, Engineering Mechanics Research Laboratories, The University of Texas at Austin (1989).

  20. E.B. Becker, R.S. Chambers, L.R. Collins, K.M. Liechti, W.G. Knauss and R. Romanko, Viscoelastic Stress Analysis Including Moisture Diffusion for Adhesively Bonded Joints, AFWAL-TR-84–4057.

  21. M.Stern, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 14 (1979) 409–420.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.F.Fau and S.S.Wang, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 20 (1984) 423–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. K.Arin and F.Erdogan, International Journal of Engineering Science 9 (1971) 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M.S. Dadkhah, A.S. Kobayashi and W. L. Morris, in The 22nd Fracture Mechanics Symposium, ASTM STP (1991) in press.

  25. C.F. Shih, Private communication.

  26. E.Zywicz and D.M.Parks, International Journal of Fracture 42 (1990) 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A.G.Evans and J.Hutchinson, Acta Metallurgica 37 (1989) 909–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H.M.Jensen, J.W.Hutchinson and K-S.Kim, International Journal of Solids and Structures 26 (1990) 1099–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. H.Chai, International Journal of Fracture 46 (1990) 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  30. K.N.Shivakumar and J.H.CrewsJr., Engineering Fracture Mechanics 28 (1987) 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. H.C.Cao and A.G.Evans, Mechanics of Materials 7 (1989) 295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. K-S.Kim and N.Aravas, International Journal of Solids and Structures 24 (1988) 417–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liechti, K.M., Liang, Y.M. The interfacial fracture characteristics of bimaterial and sandwich blister specimens. Int J Fract 55, 95–114 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017271

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017271

Keywords

Navigation