Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The particle size characteristics of fluvial suspended sediment: an overview

  • Sediment dynamics, transport and deposition, and distributions
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The particle size characteristics of suspended sediment are of fundamental importance in understanding its role in a variety of environmental processes. Existing knowledge concerning the spatial and temporal variability of the grain size composition of suspended sediment is, however, relatively limited. At the global scale, major contrasts may exist between individual rivers in the calibre of their suspended load and this may be related to a number of controls including climate, catchment geology and basin scale. Any attempt to understand the precise relationship between the grain size characteristics of suspended sediment and those of its source material must also take account of the selectivity of erosion and delivery processes. A local case study undertaken by the authors in the 1500 km2 basin of the River Exe in Devon, UK is used to illustrate the considerable spatial variability that may occur within a relatively small area and the complexity of the associated controls.

Available evidence concerning the temporal variability of the grain size characteristics of suspended sediment emphasises the diverse patterns of behaviour that may exist and the complexity of the controls involved. In some rivers the sediment may become coarser as flow increases, in others it may become finer, whilst in others it may exhibit a relatively constant grain size composition. Data from the local case study in the Exe basin are again used to highlight the considerable diversity in response to changing discharge that may occur within a relatively small area.

Any attempt to understand the dynamics of sediment movement through a river system must also take account of the potential contrast between the ultimate and effective particle size distribution of suspended sediment in response to aggregation. Results from the Exe basin study indicate that even in rivers with relatively low solute concentrations, almost an order of magnitude difference may exist between the median particle size associated with the ultimate and effective grain size distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, R. J., 1979. Sediment-related fluvial transmission of contaminants: some advances by 1979. Inland Waters Directorate, Environment Canada, Scientific Series No. 107.

  • Anttila, P. W., 1970. Sedimentation in Plum Creek subwatershed No. 4, Shelby County, North-Central Kentucky. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1798 G.

  • Ball, J., 1939. Contributions to the geography of Egypt. Government Press, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. M. & J. R. Ritter, 1971. Sediment transport and turbidity in the Eel River basin, California. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1986.

  • Carling, P. A., 1983. Particulate dynamics, dissolved and total load, in two small basins, northern Pennines, UK. Hyd. Sciences J. 28: 355–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, B. R. & C. H. Hembree, 1955. Computations of total sediment discharge Niobrara River, near Cody, Nebraska. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1357.

  • Dedkov, A. P. & V. T. Mozzherin, 1984. Eroziya i stok nanosov na zemle. Izdatelstvo Kazanskogo Universiteta.

  • Environment Canada, 1975. Sediment Data, Canadian Rivers, 1972. Inland Waters Directorate, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, G. & T. Poodle, 1970. Particle size of river sediments. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 96: 431–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, R. F., 1972. Fluvial sediment in Hocking River subwatershed 1 (North Branch Hunters Run) Ohio. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1798 I.

  • Forstner, U. & G. Wittmann, 1979. Metal pollution in the aquatic environment. Springer-Verlag, New York, 486 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. R., R. A. Young & W. H. Neibling, 1985. Sediment composition for nonpoint source pollution analyses. Trans. am. Soc. agric. Engrs. 28: 133–139, 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, F., 1960. Climat et érosion. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. J., 1977. Transport phases of transition metals in the Amazon and Yukon Rivers. Geol. Soc. am. Bull. 88: 829–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golterman, H. L., P. G. Sly & R. L. Thomas, 1983. Study of the relationship between water quality and sediment transport. UNESCO Technical Paper in Hydrology no. 26.

  • Gong, S. & G. Xiong, 1980. The origin and transport of sediment of the Yellow River. Proceedings of the International Symposium on River Sedimentation, Beijing, March 1980. Beijing, Guanghua Press, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, H. P., 1969. Laboratory theory and methods for sediment analysis. US Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resources Investigation. Book 5, chapt. Cl.

  • Hjulström, F., 1935. Studies of the morphological activity of rivers as illustrated by the River Fyris. Bull. geol. Inst. Univ. Uppsala 25: 221–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, A. J., 1985. A primer on trace metal-sediment chemistry. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2277.

  • Kennedy, V. C., 1964. Sediment transported by Georgia streams. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1668.

  • Lal, R., 1976. Soil erosion problems on an alfisol in Western Nigeria and their control. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Monograph no. 1.

  • Long, Y. & N. Qian, 1986. Erosion and transportation of sediment in the Yellow River basin. Int. J. Sediment Research 1: 2–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, R. L. & V. C. Kennedy, 1970. Variation of cation exchange capacity and rate with particle size in stream sediment: J. Wat. Pollut. Cont. Fed. 2: 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, R. H., 1985. Suspended sediment in the Amazon River and its tributaries in Brazil during 1982–84. US Geological Survey Open-File Report.

  • Meyer, L. D.,G. R. Foster & M. J. M. Romkens,1975. Source of soil eroded by water from upland slopes. In Present and prospective technology for predicting sediment yields and sources, US Dept. Agriculture Pub. ARS-S-40: 177–207.

  • Moore, J. W. & S. Ramamoorthy, 1984. Heavy metals in natural waters. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundorff, J. C., 1964. Fluvial sediment in Kiowa Creek basin, Colorado. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1798 A.

  • Mundorff, J. C., 1966. Sedimentation in Brownell Creek subwatershed No. 1, Nebraska. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1798 C.

  • Mundorff, J. C. & C. H. Scott, 1964. Fluvial sediment in the Lower Kansas River basin. Kansas State, Water Research Board Bulletin no. 7.

  • Nordin, C. F., 1963. A preliminary study of sediment transport parameters, Rio Puerco, near Bernado, New Mexico. US Geological Survey Prof. Paper 462 C.

  • Nouvelot, J. F., 1969. Mesure et etude des transports solides en suspension au Cameroun. Centre ORSTOM, Yaounde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, L. J. & W. A. Rieger, 1986. Low Australian sediment yields — a question of inefficient sediment delivery? In Drainage basin sediment delivery, IAHS Publication no. 159: 335–364.

  • Ongley, E. D., M. C. Bynoe & J. B. Percival, 1981, Physical and geochemical characteristics of suspended solids, Wilton Creek, Ontario. Can. J. Earth Sci. 18: 1365–1379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, M. W., 1976. Determination of the settling velocities of cohesive muds. Report no. IT 161, Hydraulics Research Station, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skvortsov, A. F., 1959. River suspensions and soils. Soviet soil Science 4: 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeharto, I., 1982. Supporting report on discharge and suspended sediment observations of Citarum River at Nanjung, Saguling and Palumbon. Institute of Hydraulic Engineering, Bandung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strakhov, N. M., 1967. Principles of lithogenesis. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundborg, A., 1956. The river Klaralven. A study of fluvial processes. Geografiska Annaler 38: 127–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundborg, A., 1964. Euphrates Dam, Vol. 6, Sedimentation. Project Report to Euphrates Project Authority, Syrian Arab Republic.

  • Sundborg, A., 1986. Sedimantation processes. J. Water Resources (Iraq) 5: 728–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO, 1985. Recent developments in erosion and sediment yield studies. UNESCO Technical Document in Hydrology, UNESCO, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vice, R. B., H. P. Guy & G. E. Ferguson, 1969. Sediment movement in an area of suburban highway construction, Scott Run basin, Fairfax County. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1591 E.

  • Walker, P. H., K. D. Woodyer & J. Hutka, 1974. Particlesize measurements by Coulter Counter of very small deposits and low suspended sediment concentrations in streams. J. sedimentary Petrology 44: 673–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling, D. E., 1983. The sediment delivery problem. J. of Hydrol. 69: 209–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling, D. E., S. B. Bradley & C. P. Lambert, 1986. Conveyance losses of suspended sediment within a flood plain system. In Drainage basin sediment delivery, IAHS Publication no. 159: 119–131.

  • Walling, D. E. & P. Kane, 1984. Suspended sediment properties and their geomorphological significance. In T. P. Burt & D. E. Walling (eds.), Catchment Experiments in Fluvial Geomorphology. Geobooks, Norwich: 311–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling, D. E. & B. W. Webb, 1982. Sediment availability and the prediction of storm-period sediment yields. In Recent developments in the explanation and prediction of erosion and sediment yield, IAHS Publication no. 137: 327–337.

  • Ward, P. R. B., 1980. Sediment transport and a reservoir siltation formula for Zimbabwe-Rhodesia. The Civil Engineer in South Africa, Jan 1980: 9–15.

  • Young, R. A., 1980. Characteristics of eroded sediment. Trans. am. Soc. agric. Engrs. 19: 1071–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. A. & C. A. Onstad, 1978. Characteristics of rill and inter-rill eroded soil. Trans. am. Soc. agric. Engrs. 21: 1126–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., N. Jiang & B. Lin, 1986. Environmental problems associated with sediment deposition in Guanting Reservoir. Int. J. of Sediment Research 1: 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Exeter, EX4 4RJ, Exeter, UK

    D. E. Walling & P. W. Moorehead

Authors
  1. D. E. Walling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. W. Moorehead
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walling, D.E., Moorehead, P.W. The particle size characteristics of fluvial suspended sediment: an overview. Hydrobiologia 176, 125–149 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00026549

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00026549

Key words

Search

Navigation