Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of elastic fracture mechanics parameters for bend specimens

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing solutions for stress intensity factor and mouth opening displacement of three-point bend specimens are shown to overestimate these quantities for shallow cracks by up to ±4.5 percent, because they do not account for the disturbance of the bending stress distribution by the concentrated force at the loading point. This error is far larger than the accuracy claimed by these solutions (0.2 to 0.5 percent).

New expressions are therefore developed for stress intensity, crack mouth opening displacement and crack mouth open angle of single edge notched bend specimens loaded in three-point bending. As a reference, and to show the accuracy of the solutions, also the pure bending situation is treated. Rigorously derived asymptotic solutions are used for the shallow and deep crack limits, in order to prescribe both the proper limit values and gradients to the interpolation functions, of which the intermediate values are derived from refined finite element analyses.

The crack mouth opening angle solutions are primarily intended to facilitate crack mouth opening measurement at other locations then the specimen surface, i.e. at an offset from the specimen surface as is the case when removable knife edges are applied. No solutions of the crack mouth opening angle of three-point bend specimens were available until now. For use with unloading compliance crack length measurement, also an inverse crack mouth opening relation is developed. This also includes crack mouth opening measurement at an offset from the specimen surface, which is lacking in presently available expressions of this kind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Gross, E. Roberts and J.E. Srawley, International Journal of Fracture Mechanics 4:3 (1968) 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.E. Srawley and B. Gross, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 4 (1972) 587–589.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.E. Srawley, International Journal of Francture (12) (1976) 475–476.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wu Shang-Xian, International Journal of Fracture 24 (1984) R33-R35.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.A. Kapp, G.S. Leger and B. Gross, in Fracture Mechanics: Sixteenth Symposium, ASTM STP 868, M.F. Kanninen and A.T. Hopper (eds.), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 27–44.

  6. A. Bakker, International Journal of Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures 13 (1990) 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Standard Test method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials, in 1993 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, SEction 3, E 399-90, Philadelphia, PA, USA (1993) 509–539.

  8. Standard Test Method for J Ic, A Measure of Fracture Toughness, in 1993 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 3, E 813-89, Philadelphia, PA, USA (1993) 738–752.

  9. ESIS Procedure for Determining the Fracture Behaviour of Materials, ESISPI-92, European Structural Integrity Society, Delft, The Netherlands (1992).

  10. J.P. Benthem and W.T. Koiter, in Mechanics of Fracture 1: Methods of Analysis and Solutions of Crack Problems, G.C. Sih (ed.) Noordhoff International Publishing, Leyden, The Netherlands (1973) 131–178.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W.T. Koiter, Proceedings Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences, B 59 (1956) 354–374.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Seewald, Die Spannungen und Formänderungen von Balken mit rechteckigen Querschnitt, Abhandl. Aerodynam. Inst. Techn. Hochschule Aachen, Vol. 7 (1972) 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Bakker, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures 15: 11 (1992) 1051–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  14. MARC, A General Purposa Finite Element System. MARC Analysis Corp., Palo Alto, CA, USA (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.S. Barsoum, International Journal on Numerical Methods in Englineering 11, pp. 85–98.

  16. A. Bakker, International Journal on Pressure Vessels and Piping 14, pp. 153–179.

  17. H. Tada, P.C. Paris and G.R. Irwin, The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, 2nd edn., Paris Production Inc. and Del Research Corp., St Louis, Missouri, USA (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bakker, A. Evaluation of elastic fracture mechanics parameters for bend specimens. Int J Fract 71, 323–343 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037813

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037813

Keywords

Navigation