Skip to main content
Log in

Axiomatics as a paradigm for structuring subject matter

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive model of instruction should include as one component a representation of the instructional subject matter. In order to represent subject matter a theory for structuring subject matter is required. A general theory for structuring and describing such structures is provided herein. Subject matter structure is composed of two components: content and tasks. The theory presented to structure content is based on the paradigm of axiomatics. Content elements consist of Primary Notions, Secondary Notions, Basic Principles and Established Principles. Two relationships, “used in the formulation of” and “used to establish,” provided the basic structure relating these Constituents. Coordinating relations associate task subsets with content constituents. Task subsets provide the theoretical analog to criterion tests. The notion of dependency is introduced and investigated briefly. Also, a method is provided for developing the complete set of dependency relationships for content constituents. Three examples are provided to further clarify the theoretical model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby, W. R. (1958). An Introduction to Cybernetics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. and Paradise, N. E. (1961). “Abilities and Learning Sets in Knowledge Acquisition.” Psychological Monographs, 518.

  • Gagné, R. M. (1962a). “The Acquisition of Knowledge,” Psychological Review, 69: 355–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., Mayor, J. R., Garstens, H. L., and Paradise, N. W. (1962b). “Factors in Acquiring Knowledge of a Mathematical Task.” Psychological Monographs, 526.

  • Gagné, R. M. and Bassler, O. C. (1963). “Study of Retention of Some Topics of Elementary Nonmetric Geometry.” Educational Psychology. 54: 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohn, F. E. (1966). Applied Boolean Algebra. New York: The Macmilan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohn, F. E., Seshn, S., and Aufenkamp, D.D. (1957). “The theory of nets” IRE Transactions on Electronic Computers, September, 154–161.

  • Mendelson, E. (1970). Theory and Problems of Boolean Algebra and Switching Circuits. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1969, in press). “Computer-Assisted Learning and Teaching.” Paper presented at the University of Leeds, England.

  • Pask, G. (1971). “Structuring Subject Matter with Multiple Relations.” Paper presented at HumRRO.

  • Rosenbloom, Paul C. (1950). The Elements of Mathematical Logic. Dover Publications, 1st Edition.

  • Suppes, P. (1957). Introduction to Logic. Princeton: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson, R. D. and Boutwell, R. C. (1971). “A Quality Control Design for Validating Hierarchical Sequencing of Programmed Instruction.” NSPI Journal, May, 10: 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W. and Edwards, K. J. (1971). “A Systems Model for Instructional Design and Management.” Educational Technology. September.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Stelzer is an independent research scientist affiliated with HumRRO in Alexandria, Va, as well as being an Instructor of Philosophy at Prince Georges Community College in Maryland.

Mr. Kingsley is an independent consultant formerly affiliated with HumRRO in Alexandria, Va.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stelzer, J., Kingsley, E. Axiomatics as a paradigm for structuring subject matter. Instr Sci 3, 383–450 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051903

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051903

Keywords

Navigation