Skip to main content
Log in

The clinical use of motivational messages: an inquiry into the validity of the ARCS model of motivational design

  • Articles
  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Instruction, even when prepared according to sound instructional design principles, often does not stimulate students' motivation to learn. A motivational intervention, developed according to the processes outlined inthe ARCS model of motivational design, was implemented and tested following the conventions of an embedded single-case study. It was tested with a group of 15 adults participating in a staff development course conducted within the Mozambique Ministry of Education. Results, based on concurrent and discriminant analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data, indicated that the primary treatment, motivational messages, had positive effects on student attitude and performance. It may be concluded that the specific intervention and the ARCS model which provided the basis for designing it provide a sound basis for positively influencing student motivation to learn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews D. and Goodson L. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickford, N. (1988). The systematic application of principles of motivation to the design of print materials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.

  • Bohlin R. M. (1987). Motivation in instructional design: comparison of an American and a Soviet model. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(2), 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs L. J. (1980). Thirty years of instructional design: one man's experience. Educational Technology, 29(2), 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 1, 200–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick W. and Carey L. (1979) Diseño sistemático de la instrucción. Bogotá, Colombia: Voluntad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick W. and Carey L. (1985). The systematic design of instruction. Glennview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • GagnéR. M. (1965). The analysis of instructional objectives. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Teaching machines and programmed learing, II: Data and directions (pp. 21–65). Washington, DC: Department of Audiovisual Instruction, National Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (Fourth Edition), New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinich R. (1970). Technology and the management of instruction. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt J. (1980). Never too late: my musical life story. New York, NY: Dell Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller J. M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(4), 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: an overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller J. M. (1984). Use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In K. E. Shaw (Ed.), Aspects of educational technology. Volume XVIL Staff development and career updating. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller J. M. (1987a). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction Journal, 26(8), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller J. M., (1987b). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance and Instruction Journal, 26(9), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager R. F. and Clark C. (1963). Explorations in student controlled instruction. Psychological Reports, 13, 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager R. F. and McCann J. (1961). Learner controlled instruction. Palo Alto, CA: Varian Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin B. and Driscoll M. P. (1984). Instructional theories: maximizing their strengths for application. Performance and Instruction Journal, 23(6), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland D. C. and Steele R. S. (1972). Motivation workshops: a student workbook for experiential learning in human motivation. New York, NY: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B. L. (1983, April). Motivational skills training: helping students adapt by taking personal responsibility and positive self-control. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.

  • McCombs B. L. (1984). Processes and skills underlying continuing intrinsic motivation to learn: toward a definition of motivational skills training. Educational Psychologist, 19(4), 190–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth C. M. (1979). In search of a better way to organize instruction: the elaboration theory. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(3), 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth C. M. (1989). Educational technology at the crossroads: new mindsets and new directions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37, 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake R. E. (1986). An evolutionary view of educational improvement. In E. R. House (Ed.), New directions of educational evaluation, Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake R. E. (1988). Case study methods in educational research: seeking sweet water. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser J. (1985). The systematic design of an instructional module in elementary science education for a Mozambican adult audience. Unpublished manuscript. Florida State University, Instructional Systems Program, Tallahassee, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. (1990). Enhancing learner motivation in an instructor-facilitated learning context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Fl.

  • Weiner B. (1980). Human motivation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wlodkowski R. J. (1981). Making sense out of motivation: a systematic model to consolidate motivational constructs across theories. Educational Psychologist, 16(2), 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wlodkowski R. J. (1985). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: a guide to improvíng instruction and increasing learner achievement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin R. K. (1984). Case study research: design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young M., Perraton H., Jenkins J. and Dodds T. (1980). Distance teaching for the Third World: the lion and the clockwork mouse. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visser, J., Keller, J.M. The clinical use of motivational messages: an inquiry into the validity of the ARCS model of motivational design. Instr Sci 19, 467–500 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119391

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119391

Keywords

Navigation