This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
For an analysis of how society mobilised science, beginning with the Polanyi-Bernal debates in Britain through to the postwar period in the United States, see Brooks, Harvey, “The Evolution of U.S. Science Policy: From the Endles Frontier to the Endless Resource”, in Smith, Bruce L.R. and Barfield, Claude E. (eds), Technology, R&D and the Economy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, forthcoming), and Smith, Bruce L.R., American Science Policy Since World War II (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1990), Ch. 3.
Kapitza, Sergei P., “Russian Science: Snubbed and Sickly”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (May 1994).
The Academic Ethic (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983); first printed in Reports and Documents, Minerva, XX (Spring-Summer 1982), pp. 107–208.
“The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory”, Minerva, I (Autumn 1962), pp. 54–85.
For a summary of the debates in Minerva, see Smith, BruceL.R., “The Concept of Scientific Choice: A Brief Review of the Literature”, The American Behavioral Scientist, IX (May 1966), pp. 27–36.
Smith, B.L.R., American Science Policy, op. cit., Chs. 4–6.
Price, Don K., The Scientific Estate (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1965).
LaFolletteMarcel, Stealing into Print (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992). See also Grove, J.WW., “The Morality of Scientists Revisited”, below, pp. 57–67.
Kapitza, S.P., “Russian Science”, op. cit.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, B.L.R. The accountability of science. Minerva 34, 45–56 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124200
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124200