Skip to main content
Log in

Public opinion and the federal judiciary: Crime, punishment, and demographic constraints

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article the causal connection between public opinion and law is examined and the representative model of judicial behavior is reappraised. After a description of some of the important linkages between public sentiments and judicial behavior, the empirical relationship between public attitudes toward criminal punishment and the sentences imposed for different crimes by the federal district courts is assessed during the period from 1970 to 1980. Inconsistent responses by the judiciary are found, which lead to a revision of the representative model. It is argued that this model must take into account demographic and other constraints on judicial action, as well as the salience of political issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (1981). Federal Offenders in the United States District Courts 1980. Washington, D.C.: Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association (1959). Resolutions of the Special Committee on Communist Tactics, Strategy and Objectives.

  • Bennett, Stephen Earl and Alfred J. Tuchfarber (1975). “The social-structural sources of cleavage on law and order policies,”American Journal of Political Science 19: 419–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper, Jonathan D. (1976). “The Supreme Court and national policy making,”American Political Science Review 70: 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. (1960). “The problem of social cost,”Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Beverly B. (1973). “Sentencing behavior of federal judges: draft cases—1972,”University of Cincinnati Law Review 42: 597–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Beverly B. (1977). “Public opinion and federal judicial policy,”American Journal of Political Science 21: 567–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Beverly B. (1979). “Judicial policy: change over time,”American Journal of Political Science 23: 208–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conference of Chief Justices of State Courts (1958). Report of the Committee on Federal-State Relationships as Affected by Judicial Decisions.

  • Dahl, Robert (1957). “Decision-making in a democracy: the Supreme Court as a national policy-maker,”Journal of Public Law 6: 279–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, Philip L. (1980). From Ballot to Bench: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, Eugen (1962). The Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. New York: Russell and Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, James and Herbert Jacob (1977). Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert S. (1976). “The relationship between public opinion and state policy: a new look based on some forgotten data,”American Journal of Political Science 20: 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frase, Richard S. (1980). “The decision to file federal criminal charges: a quantitative study of prosecutorial discretion,”University of Chicago Law Review 47: 246–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion 1972–1977 (1978). Wilmington, Delaware: Scholarly Resources, Inc.

  • Gaylin, Willard (1975). Partial Justice: A Study of Bias in Sentencing. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, James L. (1978). “Judges' role orientations, attitudes, and decisions,”American Political Science Review 72: 911–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, James L. (1980). “Environmental constraints on the behavior of judges: a representational model of judicial decision making,”Law & Society Review 14: 343–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Sheldon (1978). “A profile of Carter's judicial nominees,”Judicature 62: 246–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Sheldon and Thomas P. Jahnige (1971). The Federal Courts as a Political System. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Sheldon and Austin Sarat (1978). American Court Systems. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Joel B. and Austin Sarat (1971). “Political culture and judicial research,”Washington University Law Quarterly 1971: 177–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Charles V. (1973). The Bench and the Ballot: Southern Federal Judges and Black Voters. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, Travis and Michael Gottfredson (1983). “Age and the explanation of crime,”American Journal of Sociology 89: 552–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. (1881). The Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritzer, Herbert M. (1979). “Federal judges and their political environments,”American Journal of Political Science 23: 194–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinski, James H. and John E. Stanga (1979). “Political participation and government responsiveness: the behavior of the California Superior Courts,”American Political Science Review 73: 1090–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laski, Harold J. (1968). Studies in Law and Politics. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Martin A. (1977). Urban Politics and the Criminal Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Robert G. (1972). The Modern Supreme Court. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E. and Donald E. Stokes (1963). “Constituency influence in Congress,”American Political Science Review 57: 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, Alan D. (1979). “Consistency between public preferences and national policy decisions,”American Politics Quarterly 7: 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, Alan D. (1983). “American party platforms and public opinion,”American Journal of Political Science 27: 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Walter F. (1962). Congress and the Court. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Walter F. and Joseph Tannenhaus (1972). The Study of Public Law. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Stuart (1961). “Political party affiliation and judges' decisions,”American Political Science Review 55: 843–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Prisoner Statistics Bulletin SD-JPS-CP-7 (1979). Capital Punishment 1978. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.

  • Page, Benjamin I. and Robert Y. Shapiro (1983). “Effects of public opinion on policy,”American Political Science Review 77; 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin I., Robert Y. Shapiro, Paul W. Gronke, and Robert M. Rosenberg (1985). “Constituency, party, and representation in Congress,”Public Opinion Quarterly (in press).

  • Peltason, Jack W. (1955). Federal Courts in the Political Process. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltason, Jack W. (1961). Fifty-Eight Lonely Men: Southern Federal Judges and School Desegregation. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, C. Herman (1961). Congress versus the Supreme Court: 1957–1960. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Richard J. and Kenneth N. Vines (1970). “Judicial constituencies: the politics of structure,” in Richard J. Richardson and Kenneth N. Vines (eds.), The Politics of the Federal Courts. Boston, Massachusetts: Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, David J. (1981). “Decarcerating prisoners and patients,” in Hyman Gross and Andrew von Hirsch (eds.), Sentencing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, Glendon (1965). Judicial Policy-Making: The Political Role of the Courts. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, Arthur L., Rebecca Adams, Carol A. Heimer, Kim Lane Scheppele, Tom W. Smith, and D. Garth Taylor (1980). Crime and Punishment: Changing Attitudes in America. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, L. Paul (1978). Predicting Sentences in Federal Courts: The Feasibility of a National Sentencing Policy. Albany, New York: Criminal Justice Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (1983). Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1984. 104th edition. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Prisons (1975). Federal Prison System 1974. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Prisons (1978a). Federal Prison System 1977. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Prisons (1978b). Statistical Report 1976. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vines, Kenneth N. (1964). “Federal district judges and race relations cases in the South,”Journal of Politics 26: 337–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Savigny, F.C. (1975). Of the Vocation of our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silver, C., Robert, S. Public opinion and the federal judiciary: Crime, punishment, and demographic constraints. Popul Res Policy Rev 3, 255–280 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128463

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128463

Keywords

Navigation