Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Landscape change with agricultural intensification in a rural watershed, southwestern Ohio, U.S.A.

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Specialized cash grain production, emergent in the midwestern United States during the post-WWII era, typifies the Upper Four Mile Creek watershed in southwestern Ohio. This style of agriculture intensifies cropland use, with consequent increases in soil erosion and stream sedimentation - a serious problem in the lower reservoir, Acton Lake. Agricultural statistics and aerial photographs compiled between 1934 and 1984 were used to quantify agricultural dynamics and landscape change in the watershed, including land-use apportionment, diversity, and the structural configuration of forest, woodland, and old-field/brushland patches and corridors. A questionnaire sent to all land owners in the basin documented farm-level characteristics and factors that influence management decisions. Crop diversity (H′) in Preble County, Ohio decreased from 1.42 in 1934 to 1.17 in 1982, as corn and soybeans dominated the landscape mosaic. Yields rose, but net profits were reduced by declining prices per bushel and increases in fertilizer and petroleum-based subsidies. Landuse diversity in the county also declined (H′ = 1.37 in 1934 tot 0.80 in 1982) in response to cropland expansion, whereas forest land in the watershed increased from 1605 to 2603 ha. Fragmentation declined and the landscape became polarized after 1956, with a concentration of agricultural patches in the upper watershed and forest-patch coalescence in stream gullies and state park land in the lower watershed. The questionnaire (~ 29% return) further supported, at the farm-level, observed regional trends toward expansion (farm coalescence and lease contracts) and specialization (conversion toward corn and soybeans). The most important factors influencing farm size and management were better equipment and family traditions. Thus, cultural and technological factors that operate at the farm-level, coupled with meso-scale variation in the physical conditions of a catchment basin, tend to influence landscape-level patterns more than regional socioeconomics and governmental policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, W.M. 1993. Places for nature: protected areas in British nature conservation. In Conversation in Progress. pp. 185–208. Edited by F.B. Goldsmith and A. Warren. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M.A. 1987. Agroecology: the scientific basis of alternative agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, G.W. 1992. Landscape ecology: designing sustainable agricultural landscapes. J. Sustainable Agric. 2: 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, G.W., Rodenhouse, N. and Bohlen, P.J. 1990. Role of sustainable agriculture in rural landscapes. In Sustainable Agricultural Systems. pp. 624–636. Edited by C.A. Edwards, R. Lal, P. Madden, R.H. Miller and G. House. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, T.W. and Wharton, E.H. 1982. Land use change in Ohio, 1952 to 1979. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Resource Bulletin NE-70, Broomall, Pennsylvania.

  • Bowen, G.W. and Burgess, R.L. 1981. A quantitative analysis of forest island pattern in selected Ohio landscapes. ORNL/TM-7759. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, E.L. 1950. Deciduous forests of Eastern North America. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burel, F., Baudry, J. and Lefeuvre, J.C. 1993. Landscape structure and the control of water runoff. In Ecology and Agroecosystems. pp. 41–47. Edited by R.G.H. Bunce, L. Ryszkowski and M.G. Paoletti. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, T. and Haycock, N. 1993. From Westminister to Windrush: public policy in the drainage basin. Geography 78: 388–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F.H. 1990. Social relations and the growth of modern agriculture. In Agroecology. pp. 113–145. Edited by C.R. Carroll, J.H. Vandermeer and P.M. Rosset. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camboni, S.M. and Napier, T.L. 1993. Factors affecting use of conservation farming practices in east central Ohio. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 45: 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P.J. and Park, C.C. 1985. Rural Resource Management. Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, W.W. 1979. The development of American agriculture: a historical analysis. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correll, D.L. 1991. Human impact on the functioning of landscape boundaries. In Ecotones: the role of landscape boundaries in the management and restoration of changing environments. pp. 90–109. Edited by M.M. Holland, P.G. Risser and R.J. Naiman. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J.T. 1956. The modification of mid-latitude grasslands and forests by man. In Man's Role in Changing the Face of the Earth. pp. 721–736. Edited by W.L. Thomas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S.L., Renwick, H.L. and Renwick, W.H. 1991. Exploitation, conservation, preservation: a geographic perspective on natural resource use. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C.P., Stearns, F., Guntenspergen, G.R. and Sharpe, D.M. 1992. Ecological benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program. Conserv. Biology 7(1): 132–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, J.R. 1992. Idrisi technical reference. Clark University School of Geography, Worcester, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin, D.E. and Blase, M.G. 1986. The conservation reserve: potential impacts and problems. J. Soil Water Conserv. 41: 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. and Merriam, G. 1994. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conserv. Biology 8(1): 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. 1990. Ecologically sustainable landscapes: the role of spatial configuration. In Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective. pp. 261–278. Edited by I.S. Zonneveld and R.T.T. Forman. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M., Gall, G.A.E. and Woodruff, D.S. 1992. Ecological dynamics and agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environments 42: 27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D.M. and Wharton, E.H. 1994. Ohio's forests, looking good-but. Ohio Woodlands 31(2): 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J.F. 1986. Changes in the Corn Belt. Geogr. Rev. 76: 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, A.J., Urban, D.L., Marks, B. 1992. Avian community dynamics: the interplay of landscape trajectories and species life histories. In: Landscape Boundaries. pp. 170–195. Edited by A.J. Hanson and F. di Castri. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honaker, J.D. 1989. Conservation tillage practices in a rural Ohio township: a preliminary ethnographic study. MA Thesis. Miami University, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, L.R. 1988. Land-use changes in Illinois, USA: the influence of landscape attributes on current and historic land use. Landsc. Ecol. 2: 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalkovan, J.T.R. 1993. Survival of populations and the scale of the fragmented, agricultural landscape. In Ecology and Agroecosystems. pp. 83–90. Edited by R.G.H. Bunce, L. Ryszkowski and M.G. Paoletti. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienholz, B.U., Kendall, J.R., Smith, M.G. and Greenbaum, H. 1955. Ohio agricultural statistics, 1953 and 1954. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 767, Wooster, Ohio.

  • Medley, K.E., Lucas, M.L., Okey, B.W., Barrett, G.W. and Butalla, C.M. 1994. Cultural and ecological influences on the functioning of forests in agricultural watersheds. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 75(supplement): 151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, G. and Wegner, J. 1992. Local extinctions, habitat fragmentation, and ecotones. In: Landscape Boundaries. pp. 150–169. Edited by A.J. Hanson and F. di Castri. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L.D. 1986. Erosion processes and sediment properties for agricultural cropland. In: Hillslope Processes. pp. 55–76. Edited by A.D. Abrahams. Allen and Unwin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission. 1988. Upper Four Mile Creek Watershed nonpoint source pollution assessment, Preble County, Ohio. Dayton, Ohio.

  • National Research Council. 1989. Alternative agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogg, C.W. and Zellner, J.A. 1984. A conservation reserve: conserving soil and dollars. J. Soil Water Conserv. 39: 92–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okey, B. 1992. Agricultural intensification and landscape pattern in the Upper Four Mile Creek Watershed, Preble County, Ohio. MA. Thesis. Miami University, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio Agricultural Statistics Service 1986. 1985 Ohio agricultural statistics. United States Department of Agriculture Statistical Reporting Service, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio Agricultural Statistics Service 1991. 1990 Ohio agricultural statistics and Ohio Department of Agricultural annual report. Columbus, Ohio.

  • Ohio Crop Reporting Service. 1985. Ohio agricultural statistics, 1984. United States Department of Agriculture Statistical Reporting Service, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R.V., Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D.L., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S.W., Dale, V.H. and Graham, R.L. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landsc. Ecol. 1: 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallesen, J.E., Houghton, E., Smith, M.G. and Tejada, G.A. 1957. Ohio agricultural statistics, 1955–1956. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 795, Wooster, Ohio.

  • Paoletti, M.G., Pimental, D., Stinner, B.R. and Stinner, D. 1992. Agroecosystem biodiversity: matching production and conservation biology. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 40: 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, M.J. and Gilbert, J. 1989. Federal farm programs and structural change in the 1980s: a comparison of the Cornbelt and the Mississippi delta. Rural Sociol. 54: 551–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, P. 1993. Land-owners and conservation. In Conservation in Progress. pp. 255–269. Edited by F.B. Goldsmith and A. Warren. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, J.W., Bruner, M.C. and Levenson, J.B. 1981. The importance of edge in the structure and dynamics of forest islands. In Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes. pp. 67–95. Edited by R.L. Burgess and D.M. Sharpe. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, G.S., Wiland, L.H. and Wallrabenstein, P.P. 1936. Ohio agricultural statistics, 1935. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 577, Wooster, Ohio.

  • Ray, G.S., Wiland, L.H. and Wallrabenstein, P.P. 1938. Ohio agricultural statistics, 1936. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 593, Wooster, Ohio.

  • Ray, G.S., Wiland, L.H. and Wallrabenstein, P.P. 1939. Ohio agricultural statistics, 1937. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 602, Wooster, Ohio.

  • Reichelderfer, K.H. 1990. National agroenvironmental incentives programs: The U.S. experience. In Agriculture and Water Quality. International Perspectives. pp. 131–145. Edited by J.P. Braden and S.B. Lovejoy. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riebsame, W.E., Parton, W.J., Galvin, K.A., Burke, I.C., Young, R. and Knop, E. 1994. Integrated modeling of land use and cover change. BioScience 44(5): 350–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.B. 1991. Modelling the interactions between human and natural systems. International Social Science Journal 130: 629–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryszkowski, L. 1992. Energy and material flows across boundaries in agricultural landscapes. In: Landscape Boundaries, pp. 270–284. Edited by A.J. Hanson and F. di Castri. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savisky, T. 1993. An analysis of landscape change of Madison County, Georgia. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, J. 1983. Toward a sustainable Ohio in food, farmers and land. Rural Resources, Cincinnati.

  • Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. 1964. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, D.M., Guntenspergen, G.R., Dunn, C.P., Leitner, L.A. and Stearns, F. 1987. Vegetation dynamics in a southern Wisconsin agricultural landscape In Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance pp. 137–155. Edited by M.G. Turner. Springer-Verlag York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, D.M., Stearns, F.W., Burgess, R.L. and Johnson, W.C. 1982. Spatio-temporal patterns of forest ecosystems in man-dominated landscapes of the eastern United States. In Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Proceedings of the International Congress organized by the Netherlands Society for Landscape Ecology, Veldhoven, the Netherlands, April 6–11, 1981. pp. 109–116. Edited by S.P. Tjallingii and A.A. de Veer. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitterly, J.H. 1976. Land use in Ohio, 1900–1970: how and why it has changed. Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Research Bulletin 1084, Wooster, Ohio.

  • Soil Conservation Service. 1983. Central Ohio river basin report. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Forest Service, and Economic Research Service.

  • Soil Conservation Service. 1994. Understanding the human element in agricultural resource conservation. Pamphlet prepared by the Socioeconomic Research Agenda Project Task Force.

  • U.S. Bureau of Census. 1930a. U.S. census of agriculture, 1930. Volume 2, Part 1: the northern states. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Census. 1936b. U.S. census of agriculture, 1935. Volume 1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Census. 1942. U.S. census of agriculture, 1940. Volume 1, Part 1: New England, Middle Atlantic, East North Central. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Census. 1956. U.S. census of agriculture, 1954. Volume 1, Part 3: Ohio. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Census. 1984. U.S. census of agriculture, 1982. Volume 1, Part 35: Ohio. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1994. Changes ahead for the Conservation Reserve Program. Agricultural Outlook. U.S.D.A. Economic Research Service (July 1994): 26–30.

  • aU.S. Department of Agriculture. 1992. Watershed plan and environmental assessment for Four Mile Creek Watershed, Ohio and Indiana. Report prepared in collaboration with the Soil Conservation Service and the U.S. Forest Service, Columbus, Ohio.

  • U.S. President. 1971. Economic report of the President transmitted to Congress. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. President. 1987. Economic report of the President transmitted to Congress. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. President. 1991. Economic report of the President transmitted to Congress. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, R.E. 1994. Agricultural land use and grassland habitat in Illinois: future shock for midwestern birds? Conserv. Biology 8(1): 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, A. 1993. Naturalness: a geomorphological approach. In Conservation in Progress. pp. 15–24. Edited by F.B. Goldsmith and A. Warren. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Brian W. Okey

    Present address: Agroecosystem Health Program, University of Guelph, N1G2W1, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Miami University, 45056, Oxford, Ohio, USA

    Kimberly E. Medley, Brian W. Okey, Michael F. Lucas & William H. Renwick

  2. Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, 30602, Athens, Georgia, USA

    Gary W. Barrett

Authors
  1. Kimberly E. Medley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian W. Okey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gary W. Barrett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael F. Lucas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. William H. Renwick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Medley, K.E., Okey, B.W., Barrett, G.W. et al. Landscape change with agricultural intensification in a rural watershed, southwestern Ohio, U.S.A.. Landscape Ecol 10, 161–176 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133029

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133029

Keywords

Search

Navigation