Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that the academic environments provided by departments in higher education have direct effects on students' approaches to studying. But other studies have indicated that these effects are mediated by the students' own perceptions of those environments. Here two studies are reported which explore the relationships between approaches to learning, or study orientations, and perceptions of the academic environment. Those perceptions are measured in two distinct ways, one which minimises the effects of differential perceptions, and one which highlights them. Factor analyses of the responses of three groups of students taking engineering and psychology are used to clarify the nature of the relationships between study orientations and perceptions of the academic environment. It is found, as in earlier studies, that there are relationships which associate deep approaches with perceptions of relevance, and surface approaches with a heavy workload. But here it is also shown that students with contrasting study orientations are likely to define effective teaching in ways which reflect those orientations. Implications both for the design of feedback questionnaires and for the improvement of teaching and learning in higher education are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Cohen, P. A. (1981). ‘Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis on multisection validity studies’. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281–309.
Eizenberg, N. (1988). ‘Approaches to learning anatomy: developing a programme for preclinical medical students’. In P. Ramsden (Ed.), Improving Learning: New Perspectives. London: Kogan Page (pp. 178–198).
Entwistle, N. J. (1987). ‘A model of the teaching-learning process’. In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. Warren Piper (Eds.). Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology. London: S.R.H.E./Open University Press (pp. 13–28).
Entwistle, N. J. (1989). ‘Approaches to studying and course perceptions: The case of the disappearing relationship’. Studies in Higher Education, 14, 156–157.
Entwistle, N. J. & Entwistle, D. M. (1970). ‘The relationships between personality, study methods and academic performance’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 132–141.
Entwistle, N. J. & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.
Entwistle, N. J. & Tait, H. (1989). ‘Factors influencing academic performance in electrical engineering: Expectations, approaches and perceptions’. Paper presented at the Third Conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Madrid, September, 1989.
Janssen, P. J. (1989). ‘Task, development and process in student learning: Towards an integrated theory of studying’. European Journal of the Psychology of Education (in press).
Hounsell, D. J. (1984). ‘Understanding teaching and teaching for understanding’. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press (pp. 189–210).
Marsh, H. W. (1987). ‘Students’ evaluations of university teaching' research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research’. International Journal of Educational Research, 11 (3) (whole issue).
Marton, F. (1976). ‘What does it take to learn? Some implications of an alternative view of learning’. In N. J. Entwistle (Ed.), Strategies for Research and Development in Higher Education. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Marton, F. & Saljo, R. (1984). ‘Approaches to learning’. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press (pp. 36–55).
Meyer, J. H. F. (1988). ‘Student perceptions of learning context and approaches to studying’. South African Journal of Higher Education, 20, 532–534.
Meyer, J. H. F., and Parsons, P. (1989). ‘Approaches to studying and course perceptions using the Lancaster Inventory’. Studies in Higher Education, 14, 137–155.
Murray (1986). ‘Classroom teaching behaviors and student instructional ratings: New evidence on an old problem’. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April, 1986.
Newble, D. & Clarke, R. (1987). ‘Approaches to learning in a traditional and an innovative medical school’. In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. Warren Piper (Eds.). Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press (pp. 39–48).
Nie, N. J., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., & Bent, D. H. (1975). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw Hill.
Pask, G. (1988). ‘Learning strategies, teaching strategies and conceptual or learning style’. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.) Learning Styles and Strategies. New York: Plenum Press (pp. 83–100).
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Ramsden, P. (1981). A Study of the Relationship between Student Learning and Its Academic Context. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Lancaster.
Ramsden, P. & Marton, F. (1988). ‘What does it take to improve learning?’ In P. Ramsden (Ed.) Improving Learning: New Perspectives. London: Kogan Page (pp. 268–278).
Thomas, P. (1986). The Structures and Stability of Learning Approaches. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Queensland, Australia.
Van Rossum, E. J. & Taylor, I. P. (1987). The relationship between conceptions of learning and good teaching: A scheme of cognitive development’. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting in Washington, April, 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Entwistle, N., Tait, H. Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. High Educ 19, 169–194 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137106
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137106