Skip to main content
Log in

An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies on collaborative research emphasize industry-university collaboration conducted in a subset of academic disciplines associated with applied engineering. These studies focus on motivations, mechanisms, financial costs and financial benefits of collaborative research while paying little attention to the impact of collaborative research on academic productivity. The purpose of this paper is to attempt to compensate for some of these shortcomings. First, we present a survey which includes responses from academic researchers of all the scientific disciplines. Second, we take into account and compare the collaborative relationships between university researchers, between university researchers and industry, and between university researchers and other institutions, especially government agencies, local governments and organized interest groups. And third, we assess the impact of these collaborative activities on the academic productivity of the university researchers.

The results of this paper show that collaboration, whether it be undertaken with universities, industries or institutions, may indeed increase researchers' productivity. We find this to be true whether or not such relationships begin early in a researcher's career. We also find this to be true whether or not the collaborators have an intellectual symmetry. The effect of collaboration on productivity varies according to both the scientists' geographical closeness to their partners and on their field of research. It was found that collaboration between researchers and industry had significantly more impact on productivity than collaborations between researchers and their peers or researchers and other institutions. Scientists in humanities were found to produce less materials in collaboration than scientists in other fields. And, scientists involved in collaboration aimed mostly at producing patented and unpatented products, scientific instruments, software and artistic production were also found to produce less.

In sum, given that collaboration contributes to the increase of scientific productivity, government decision makers and university administrators ought to encourage researchers to forge collaborative relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, D. and Green, J. (1984). ‘University-industry relations: a review of the literature’, Journal of the Society of Research Administrators 14(4).

  • Bonaccorsi, A. and Piccaluga, A. (1994). ‘A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships’, R & D Management 24(3), 229–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, E. (1993). Léconomie des Contrats. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M.F. and Faver, C. (1984). ‘Independence and cooperation in research’, Journal of Higher Education 55, May–June.

  • Frame, J.D. and Carpenter, M.P. (1979). ‘International research collaboration, Social Studies of Science 9, 481–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisler, E. and Rubenstein, A. (1989). ‘University-industry relations: a review of major issues’, Cooperative Research and Development: the Industry, University, Government Relationship, Norwell, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B., Barker, S. and Landry, M. (1995). ‘Besides academic publications: which sectors compete, or are then competitors?’, Scientometrics 33(1), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M.D. (1980). ‘A critical reassessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific collaboration, the production of papers and their acceptance for publication’, Scientometrics 2, 3, 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guston, D.H. and Keniston, K. (ed.) (1994). The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S. and Larsen, I.M. (1994). ‘International contact and research performance’, Scientometrics, 29(1), 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. K.and Wigand, R.T. (1987). ‘Industry-university technology transfer in microelectronics’, Policy Studies Review 6(3), 584–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewison, G. and Cunningham, P. (1991). ‘Bibliometric studies for the evaluation of transnational research’, Scientometrics 21(2), 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T. et al. (1992). ‘Understanding patters of international scientific collaboration’ Science, Technology and Human Values 17(1), 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J.E. and Rebne, D.S. (1995). ‘Nonlinear effects of teaching and consulting on academic research productivity’, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 29(1), 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Stevens, K. and Whitlow, E.S. (1991). ‘Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers’, Scientometrics 21(3), 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • OCDE (1989). ‘Les relations avec les établissements d'enseignements supérieur’, chapitre dans Un rôle nouveau pour les organismes publics de recherche. Paris: OCDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onida, F. and Malerba, F. (1989). ‘R & D cooperation between industry, universities and research organizations in Europe’, Technovation 9, 131–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, L.S. and Fusfeld, H.I. (1983). ‘Current US university-industry research connections’, in National Science Foundation, University-Industry Research Relationships: Selected Studies, Washington: NSF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, D.R. et al. (1988). Higher Education in Partnership with Industry: Opportunities and Strategies for Training, Research and Economic Development, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. and Beaver, D. (1966). ‘Collaboration in an invisible college’, American Psychologist 21, 1011–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebne, D. (1989). ‘Faculty consulting and scientific knowledge: a traditional university-industry linkage’, Educational Administration Quarterly 25(4), 338–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruscio, K. (1984). ‘University-industry cooperation as a problem in interorganizational relations’, in Bozeman, B., Crow, M. and Link, A. (eds), Strategic Management of Industrial R & D. Lexington, Ma: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadlack, J. (1992). ‘New reality in university-industry relations: a search for foundations and forms’, Interchange 23(2/2), 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tither, D. (1990). ‘A case study of technology transfer and funding mechanisms in an industrially supported multi-centred university research initiative, Technovation 10(1), 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landry, R., Traore, N. & Godin, B. An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity. High Educ 32, 283–301 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138868

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138868

Keywords

Navigation