Skip to main content
Log in

The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality, outcomes and cost-effectiveness of methods of teaching and learning in colleges and universities are being scrutinised more closely. The increasing use of peer tutoring in this context necessitates a clear definition and typology, which are outlined. The theoretical advantages of peer tutoring are discussed and the research on peer tutoring in schools briefly considered. The substantial existing research on the effectiveness of the many different types and formats of peer tutoring within colleges and universities is then reviewed. Much is already known about the effectiveness of some types of peer tutoring and this merits wider dissemination to practitioners. Directions for future research are indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American River College (1993). A.R.C. Beacon Project: Student Catalyst Program - Peer Assisted Learning; First Semester Summary Report. Sacramento CA: American River College (ED355995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen, C.L. and Bernard, R.M. (1989). ‘Institutional support for peer contact in distance education: an empirical investigation’, Distance Education 10(1), 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annis, L.F. (1983). ‘The processes and effects of peer tutoring’, Human Learning 2(1), 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arneman K. and Prosser M. (1993). ‘The development of two peer tutoring programmes in the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sydney’, in Proceedings of Conference on Peer Tutoring at University of Auckland 19–21 August 1993. Auckland: Higher Education Research Office and University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashman, A.F. and Elkins, J. (1990). ‘Co-operative learning among special students’, in Foot, H.C., Morgan, M.J. and Shute, R.H. (eds.), Children Helping Children. London and New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J.A. and Schul, Y. (1980). ‘On the cognitive benefits of teaching’, Journal of Educational Psychology 72(5), 593–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1992). Improving Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L.R. (1960). ‘Sociability and academic achievement in various types of learning situations’, Journal of Educational Psychology 51(4), 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E. (1983). ‘The peer tutor: the writing center's most valuable resource’, Teaching English in the Two-Year College 9(2), 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benware, C.A. and Deci, E.L. (1984). ‘Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set’, American Educational Research Journal 21(4), 755–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidgood, P. (1994). ‘The success of supplemental instruction: the statistical evidence’, in Rust, C. and Wallace, J. (eds.), Helping Students to Learn from Each Other: Supplemental Instruction. Birmingham: Staff and Educational Development Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. (1993). ‘Peer tutor support in nursing and midwifery at Otago Polytechnic’, in Proceedings of Conference on Peer Tutoring at University of Auckland 19–21 August 1993. Auckland: Higher Education Research Office and University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobko, E. (1984). ‘The effective use of undergraduates as tutors for college science students’, Journal of College Science Teaching 14, 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgham, R.G. and Scarborough, S. (1992). ‘Effects of supplemental instruction in selected medical school science courses’, Academic Medicine 67(10), 569–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1983). Adult Learners, Adult Education and the Community. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, B.L., Sims, R. and White, L. (1990). ‘Experience of proctoring over three years at Nottingham Polytechnic’, in Goodlad, S. and Hirst, B. (eds.), Explorations in Peer Tutoring. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen. P.A., Kulik, J.A. and Kulik, C-L.C. (1982). ‘Educational outcomes of tutoring: a meta-analysis of findings’, American Educational Research Journal 19(2), 237–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cone, A.L. (1988). ‘Low tech/high touch criterion-based learning’, Psychological Reports 63(1), 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, M.G. (1979). Students as Teachers: Peer Teaching in Higher Education. Amsterdam: C.O.W.O., University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C.S. (1978). ‘Peer tutors: their utility and training in the personalised system of instruction’, Educational Technology 18, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, W. and Mugny, G. (1984). The Social Development of the Intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durling, R. and Schick, C. (1976). ‘Concept attainment by pairs and individuals as a function of vocalization’, Journal of Educational Psychology 68(1), 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1993). Quality Assurance for University Teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N.J. and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. Beckenham: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (1992). The Impact of Teaching and Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: A Literature Review. Sheffield: Universities and Colleges Staff Development Unit, CVCP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falchikov, N. (1990). ‘An experiment in same-age peer tutoring in higher education: some observations concerning the repeated experience of tutoring or being tutored’, in Goodlad, S. and Hirst, B. (eds.), Explorations in Peer Tutoring. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J.W., Dimeff, L.A. and Fox, S.L. (1989). ‘Reciprocal peer tutoring: a multimodal assessment of effectiveness with college students’, Teaching of Psychology 16(3), 133–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J.W., Riggio, R.W., Connelly, S. and Dimeff, L. (1989). ‘Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: a component analysis’, Journal of Educational Psychology 81(2), 173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S. (1981). ‘Reflections on peer teaching and peer assessment: an undergraduate experience’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 6(1), 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, H.C., Shute, R.H., Morgan, M.J. and Barron, A. (1990). ‘Theoretical issues in peer tutoring’, in Foot, H.C., Morgan, M.J. and Shute, R.H. (eds.), Children Helping Children. London and New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, E. (1994). ‘Peer collaboration as situated activity: examples from research on scientific problem solving’, in Foot, H.C., Howe, C.J., Anderson, A., Tolmie, A.K. and Warden, D.A. (eds.), Group and Interactive Learning. Southampton and Boston: Computational Mechanics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemouw, W.J. and Feindler, E.L. (1978). ‘Peer versus professional models for study skills training’, Journal of Counseling Psychology 25(6), 576–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, S., Kohler, M. and Riessman (1971). Children Teach Children: Learning by Teaching. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gere, A.R. (1987). Writing Groups: History, Theory and Implications. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (1981). Teaching Students To Learn. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmid, B. and Goldschmid, M.L. (1976). ‘Peer teaching in higher education: a review’, Higher Education 5, 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, C.R., Carta, J.J. and Kamps, D. (1990). ‘Teacher-mediated versus peer-mediated instruction: a review of educational advantages and disadvantages’, in Foot, H.C., Morgan, M.J. and Shute, R.H. (eds.), Children Helping Children. London and New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, G. (1990). ‘Peer learning and support via audio-teleconferencing in continuing education for nurses’, Distance Education 11(2), 308–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, H.J. (1990). ‘Factors affecting the tutoring process’, Journal of Educational Development 14(2), 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, I. (1993). ‘Writing groups in geography’, in Proceedings of Conference on Peer Tutoring at University of Auckland 19–21 August 1993. Auckland: Higher Education Research Office and University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, C.E. (1994). ‘Supplemental instruction: a model for supporting student learning’, in Foot, H.C., Howe, C.J., Anderson, A., Tolmie, A.K. and Warden, D.A. (eds.), Group and Interactive Learning. Southampton and Boston: Computational Mechanics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendelman, W.J. and Boss, M. (1986). ‘Reciprocal peer teaching by medical students in the gross anatomy laboratory’, Journal of Medical Education 61(8), 674–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holladay, J. (1989). Monroe County Community College Writing Across the Curriculum: Annual Report 1988–89. Michigan: Monroe County Community College (ED310820).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holladay, J. M. (1990). Writing Across the Curriculum: Annual Report 1989–90. Michigan: Monroe County Community College (ED326260).

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J.D. and Wohlt, V. (1990). ‘The effect of tutoring program participation on the performance of academically underprepared college freshmen’, Journal of College Student Development 31, 365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, M.L., Martenson, D.F. and Bircher, J. (1992). ‘Students as tutors in problem-based learning: does it work?’, Medical Education 26(2), 163–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C. (1993). ‘The integration of trainee teachers in an undergraduate peer tutoring project at the University of Melbourne’, in Proceedings of Conference on Peer Tutoring at University of Auckland 19–21 August 1993. Auckland: Higher Education Research Office and University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F.S. (1968). ‘Goodbye, teacher ...’, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1(1), 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, P.A. and Kallison, J.M. (1994). ‘Research studies on the effectiveness of supplemental instruction in mathematics’, New Directions for Teaching and Learning 60(4), 75–82 (special issue on Supplemental Instruction).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.C. and Cohen, P.A. (1979). ‘A meta-analysis of outcome studies of Keller's personalised system of instruction’, American Psychologist 34(4), 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking University Teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, D. (1989). ‘Peer helping programs in the colleges and universities of Quebec and Ontario’, Canadian Journal of Counselling 23(1), 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R.E. (1988). ‘Assessing retention program holding power effectiveness across smaller community colleges’, Journal of College Student Development 29(3), 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J.R. (1990). ‘Using a peer tutor to improve writing in a psychology class: one instructor's experience’, Teaching of Psychology 17(1), 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, H.M., Glass, G.V. and Meister, G.R. (1987). ‘A cost-effectiveness analysis of computerassisted instruction’, Evaluation Review 11(1), 50–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidren, D.M., Meier, S.E. and Brigham, T.A. (1991). ‘The effects of minimal and maximal peer tutoring systems on the academic performance of college students’, Psychological Record 41(1), 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh, H. (1993). ‘Peer assisted study sessions in anatomy for nursing students’, in Proceedings of Conference on Peer Tutoring at University of Auckland 19–21 August 1883. Auckland: Higher Education Research Office and University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longuevan, C. and Shoemaker, J. (1991). ‘Using multiple regression to evaluate a peer tutoring program for undergraduates’, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the California Educational Research Association, San Diego CA, November 14–15 (ED341717).

  • Louth, R., McAllister, C. and McAllister, H.A. (1993). ‘The effects of collaborative writing techniques on freshman writing and attitudes’, Journal of Experimental Education 61(3), 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, R.B. (1980). Adult Learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, J.T. (1994). ‘Peer tutoring: a pilot scheme among computer science undergraduates’, Mentoring and Tutoring 2(2), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKellar, N.A. (1986). ‘Behaviors used in peer tutoring’, Journal of Experimental Education 54(3), 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magin, D. and Churches, A. (1993). ‘Student proctoring: who learns what?’, Proceedings of Conference on Peer Tutoring at University of Auckland 19–21 August 1993. Auckland: Higher Education Research Office and University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallatrat, J. (1994). ‘Learning about the learners - the impact of a peer tutoring scheme’, in Foot, H.C., Howe, C.J., Anderson, A., Tolmie, A.K. and Warden, D.A. (eds.), Group and Interactive Learning. Southampton and Boston: Computational Mechanics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D.C. and Arendale, D.R. (1990). Supplemental Instruction: Improving Student Performance, Increasing Student Persistence. Kansas City MO: University of Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D.C. and Arendale, D.R. (1992). ‘Supplemental instruction: improving first-year student success in high-risk courses’, The Freshman Year Experience: Monograph Series No. 7. Columbia SC: South Carolina University (ED354839).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D.C., Blanc, R.A. and DeBuhr, L. (1983). ‘Breaking the attrition cycle: the effects of supplemental instruction on undergraduate performance and attrition’, Journal of Higher Education 54(1), 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwistle, N. (1984). The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, M. (1990). ‘Does tutoring help? a look at the literature’, Review of Research in Developmental Education 7(4), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, G.M. and Schmitz, E.D. (1986). ‘Student-taught and faculty-taught seminars in undergraduate education: another look’, Perceptual and Motor Skills 62(2), 593–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, R. and Caffarella, R.S. (1991). Learning in Adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, S. and McCrae, J. (1994). ‘Cross year peer tutoring with law undergraduates’, in Foot, H.C., Howe, C.J., Anderson, A., Tolmie, A.K. and Warden, D.A. (eds.), Group and Interactive Learning. Southampton and Boston: Computational Mechanics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore-West, M., Hennessy, A., Meilman, P.W. and O'Donnell, J.F. (1990). ‘The presence of student-based peer advising, peer tutoring and performance evaluation programs among U.S. medical schools’, Academic Medicine 65(10), 660–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moust, J.H.C., De Volder, M.L., and Nuy, H.J.P. (1989). ‘Peer teaching and higher level cognitive learning outcomes in problem-based learning’, Higher Education 18(6), 737–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moust, J.C. and Schmidt, H.G. (1992). ‘Undergraduate students as tutors: are they as effective as faculty in conducting small-group tutorials?’, Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Symposium on Rewarding Teaching at Research Universities, San Francisco CA, April 23 (ED 346774).

  • Moust, J.H.C. and Schmidt, H.G. (1994a). ‘Facilitating small-group learning: a comparison of student and staff tutors' behavior’, Instructional Science 22, 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moust, J.H.C. and Schmidt, H.G. (1994b). ‘Effects of staff and student tutors on student achievement’, Higher Education 28, 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Supplemental Instruction (1994). Review of Research Concerning the Effectiveness of SI. Kansas City MO: NCSI, University of Missouri at Kansas City.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, A.M., Dansereau, D.F., Rocklin, T., Lambiotte, J.G., Hythecker, V.I. and Larson, C.O. (1985). ‘Co-operative writing: direct effects and transfer’, Written Communication 2(3), 307–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oley, N. (1992). ‘Extra credit and peer tutoring: impact on the quality of writing in introductory psychology in an OA college’, Teaching of Psychology 19(2), 78–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, O.A. (ed.) (1984). Writing Centers: Theory and Administration. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintrell, N. and Westwood, M. (1994). ‘The influence of a peer-pairing program on international students' first year experience and use of student services’, Higher Education Research and Development 13(1), 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (ed.) (1986). Improving Learning. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J.T., Eysenck, M.W. and Piper, D.W. (eds.) (1987). Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R.E., Fantuzzo, J.W., Connelly, S. and Dimeff, L.A. (1991). ‘Reciprocal peer tutoring: a classroom strategy for promoting academic and social integration in undergraduate students’, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 6(2), 387–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolo, P. (1982). ‘Peer tutors make good teachers: a successful writing program’, Improving College and University Teaching 30(3), 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, A.L. and Heselton, P. (1977). ‘Proctor training: the effects of a manual versus direct training’, Journal of Personalised Instruction 2, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. (1977). Adults Learning (second edition). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S., Powell, E.R. and Schubot, D.B. (1977). ‘Peer-tutoring outcomes as influenced by the equity and type of role assignment’, Journal of Educational Psychology 69(3), 244–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, C. (1993). ‘Supplemental instruction at Oxford Brookes University’, Paper given at Peer Tutoring Consortium Conference, University of Glamorgan, 23 June 1993.

  • Rust, C. and Wallace, J. (eds.) (1994). Helping Students to Learn from Each Other: Supplemental Instruction. Birmingham: Staff and Educational Development Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rye, P.D., Wallace, J. and Bidgood, P. (1993). ‘Instruction in learning skills: an integrated approach’, Medical Education 27, 470–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, J.L., Wile, M.Z. and Griggs, R.C. (1990). ‘Students teaching students: a medical school peer tutorial programme’, Medical Education 24(4), 336–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H., Arend, A.V.D., Kokx, I. and Boon, L. (1994). ‘Peer versus staff tutoring in problem-based learning’, Instructional Science 22, 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D.H. (1987). ‘Self-efficacy and motivated learning’, in Hastings, N. and Schwieso, J. (eds.), New Directions in Educational Psychology: Behaviour and Motivation in the Classroom. London and New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D.H. and Zimmermann, B.J. (eds.) (1994). Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, T.E. and Osguthorpe, R.T. (1986). ‘Tutoring interventions within special education settings: a comparison of cross-age and peer tutoring’, Psychology in the Schools 23(2), 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, A.M. and Sharpley, C.F. (1981). ‘Peer tutoring: a review of the literature’, Collected Original Resources in Education 5(3), 7-C11 (fiche 7 and 8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J.G. (1992). ‘Reflections on PSI: good news and bad’, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 25(1), 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Beyond I.Q. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, P. (ed.) (1996). Adult Learning: A Reader. London: Kogan Page (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (ed.) (1983). Adult Learning and Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K.J. (1992). ‘Co-operative learning and peer tutoring: an overview’, The Psychologist 5, 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K.J., Hill, S., McKaig, A., Rogers, C., Rushi, N. and Young, D. (1996). ‘Paired reciprocal peer tutoring in undergraduate economics’, (submitted for publication).

  • Topping, K.J., Simpson, G., Thompson, L. and Hill, S. (1996). ‘Evaluation of faculty-wide student supported learning at the University of Central Lancashire’, (submitted for publication).

  • Topping, K.J., Watson, G.A., Jarvis, R.J. and Hill, S. (1996). ‘Same-year paired peer tutoring in undergraduate mathematics’, (submitted for publication).

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). ‘Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes’, (edited by Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. and Souberman, E.). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. (1993). ‘Supplemental instruction at Kingston University’, Paper given at Peer Tutoring Consortium Conference, University of Glamorgan, 23 June 1993.

  • Webb, N.M. (1982). ‘Peer interaction and learning in co-operative small groups’, Journal of Educational Psychology 5(74), 642–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, N.A. (1988). Peer Teaching: To Teach Is To Learn Twice (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report). Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Topping, K.J. The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. High Educ 32, 321–345 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138870

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138870

Keywords

Navigation