Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A milestone in the policy sciences

  • Book review essay
  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

What stands in the way of inquiry to help communities clarify and secure theircommon interests? The problem is not the theories and procedures available,as many scholars presume. The framework presented in Jurisprudence for aFree Society is quite adequate even if it is provisional. The problem is professionalism(Torgerson, 1985), or more precisely, the decline of professionalismas it was understood in the Law, Science, and Policy seminar over severaldecades. As McDougal recalls in the Preface:

A profession, we insisted, is best regarded as a group with both a specialskill and a sense of responsibility for the consequences upon the communityof the exercise of that skill. The special skill of the lawyer is in the managementof authority and control in the making of decisions, and the genuineprofessional must seek to synthesize all relevant knowledge and pro-cedures toward decisions that serve common interests' (p. xxiii; emphasisadded).

The decline of professionalism is all around us. It reflects and reinforces thesame specializing and fragmenting factors that call into question the sustainabilityof late modem or post-modern society. The question for this generationof policy scientists is whether the policy sciences, subject to the samepressures as other skill groups, can maintain the professional standards exemplifiedby Lasswell and McDougal and stay the course they have set in Jurisprudencefor a Free Society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Amsterdamska, O. (1994). “Editorial,” Science, Technology and Human Values 19: 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (1992). ‘Whistleblower prize for O'Toole,’ Science 257 (July 3): 27.

  • Boulding, K. E. (1961). The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D. (1991). ‘The policy movement as a policy problem,’ Policy Sciences 24:65–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D. (1994). ‘Myth and American politics,’ Policy Sciences 27:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D. and W. Ascher (1993). ‘Science and social responsibility,’ Policy Sciences 25: 295–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, P. (1994). ‘Reinventing the policy sciences: Three steps back to the future,’ Policy Sciences 27: 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1970). After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society. New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1994). The New American Political (Dis)order. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. D. (1995). ‘Paradigm lost,’ Space Policy 11:153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. A. (1995). ‘Casting the spell: The New Haven School of international law,’ Yale Law Journal 104: 1991–2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., S. R. Watson and C. Hope (1984). ‘Defining risk,’ Policy Sciences 17: 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1995). ‘What barriers? What bridges?’ in L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling and S. S. Light, eds., Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronman, A. T. (1995). Letter to the editor, New York Times. (September 28): A12.

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1943a). Memorandum: Personal policy objectives (October 1). Archived at Sterling Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1943b). Proposal: The Institute of Policy Sciences (October 1). Archived at Sterling Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1966). ‘The world revolution of our time: A framework for basic policy research,’ in H. D. Lasswell and D. Lerner, eds., World Revolutionary Elites: Studies in Coercive Ideological Movements. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, pp. 29–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. and McDougal (1943). ‘Legal education and public policy: Professional training in the public interest,’ Yale Law Journal 52: 203–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, E. H. (1948). An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, W. (1965). Public Opinion. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M. (1990). The Greatest-Ever Bank Robbery: The Collapse of the Savings and Loan Industry. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, H. (1995). ‘Space exploration policy: Toward an operational vision,’ Space Policy 11: 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, N. R. and R. Guskind (1993). Breakthroughs: Recreating the American City. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. A. (1985). ‘Different worlds in the same classroom: Students' evolution in their vision of knowledge and their expectations of teachers,’ On Teaching and Learning (May): 3-17.

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1979). ‘On cognized models,’ in his Ecology, Meaning, and Religion. Richmond, CA: North Atlantic Books, pp. 97–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Mature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. and M. Rein (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1957). ‘Rationality and administrative decision making,’ in his Models of Man. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 196–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1985). ‘Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science,’ American Political Science Review 79: 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1993). ‘Perceived risk, trust, and democracy,’ Risk Analysis 13: 675–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. (1995) Rethinking America. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. R., Jr. (1995). ‘Ecosystem management and the arrogance of humanism,’ Conservation Biology 9: 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, D. (1985). ‘Contextual orientation in policy analysis: The contribution of Harold D. Lasswell,’ Policy Sciences 18: 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, D. (1992). ‘Priest and Jester in the policy sciences: Developing the focus of inquiry,’ Policy Sciences 25:225–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brunner, R.D. A milestone in the policy sciences. Policy Sci 29, 45–68 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141479

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141479

Navigation