Skip to main content
Log in

Block diagrams and splitting criteria for classification trees

  • Papers
  • Published:
Statistics and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various aspects of the classification tree methodology of Breiman et al., (1984) are discussed. A method of displaying classification trees, called block diagrams, is developed. Block diagrams give a clear presentation of the classification, and are useful both to point out features of the particular data set under consideration and also to highlight deficiencies in the classification method being used. Various splitting criteria are discussed; the usual Gini-Simpson criterion presents difficulties when there is a relatively large number of classes and improved splitting criteria are obtained. One particular improvement is the introduction of ‘adaptive anti-end-cut factors’ that take advantage of highly asymmetrical splits where appropriate. They use the number and mix of classes in the current node of the tree to identify whether or not it is likely to be advantageous to create a very small offspring node. A number of data sets are used as examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A. and Stone, C. J. (1984) Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth, Belmont, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Dombal, F. T., Leaper, D. J., Staniland, J. R., McCann, A. P. and Horrocks, J. C. (1972) Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. British Medical Journal, 2, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. C. and Sibson, R. (1987) What is projection pursuit? (with Discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 150, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh, W.-Y. and Vanichsetakul, N. (1988) Tree-structured classification via generalized discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 715–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubischew, A. A. (1962) On the use of discriminant functions in taxonomy. Biometrics, 18, 455–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. C. (1990) Classification Trees, PhD Thesis, School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, P.C., Silverman, B.W. Block diagrams and splitting criteria for classification trees. Stat Comput 3, 147–161 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141771

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141771

Keywords

Navigation