Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of habit formation on modal choice —a Heuristic model

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most modal split models have been based on the assumption of rational behaviour in an individual's choice evaluation of the generalised costs of modal alternatives. This paper integrates conceptual and empirical information from a wide range of sources and points towards an alternative way of looking at modal choice. The main conclusion is that the car is usually perceived as the superior mode for vehicular travel and that the potential user is committed to its use largely through the act of purchasing it. The conceptual structure of a sequential modal split model is outlined as one that is based on a four-stage decision-making framework which considers the role of learning and habit-formation. In the conclusion, the implications of this approach are considered in terms of the conventional modal split and trip generation submodels, and certain policy measures are assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banister, D. J. (1976a). “The Concept of Car Availability and its Application to Modal Split Modelling.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Leeds.

  • Banister, D. J. (1976b). “Transport Mobility and Deprivation in Inter-Urban Areas.” Paper presented to the IBG Social Geography Group Conference — Open University.

  • Banister, D. J. (1977). “Car Availability and Usage: A Modal Split Model Based on these concepts.” University of Reading, Department of Geography, Geographical Paper No. 58.

  • Baum, H. J. (1973). “Free public transport,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 7(1): 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, M. J. and L. D. Burns (1976). “A theory of household automobile allocation decisions,” Transportation Science, 10(1): 42–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bly, P. H. (1976). “The Effects of Fares on Bus Patronage,” Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Report LR 733.

  • Bostick, T. A. and T. R. Todd (1966). “Travel Characteristics of Persons living in larger Cities,” Highway Research Record, No. 106, (Washington Highway Research Board), 52–57.

  • Deslauriers, B. C. (1975). “A Behavioural Analysis of Transportation: Some Suggestions for Mass Transit,” High Speed Ground Transportation Journal, 9(2): 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, M. C. (1976). “Unstructured Household Interviews as a Means of Investigating the Travel Decision Process,” UTSG, January, Aston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, R. (1975). “Towards an analysis of attitudinal and behavioural responses to transportation systems characteristics,” Transportation, 4: 267–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domencich, T. A. and D. McFadden (1975). Urban Travel Demand. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, P. B., S. C. Hayward and A. W. Meyers (1974). “The Effects of a Token Reinforcement Procedure on Bus Ridership,” Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 7(1): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R. H. (1974). “The nature of travel decision making,” Transportation Research Report, 526: 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. G. (1969). “The Geographical Relevance of Some Learning Theories,” 101–145 in K. R. Cox and R. G. Golledge,″ Behavioural Problems in Geography, North Western University Studies in Geography No. 17.

  • Golledge, R. G. and L. A. Brown (1967). “Search Learning and the Market Decision Process,” Geografiska Annaler, B, 49(2): 116–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, P. B. (1977). “Habit and hysteresis in mode choice,” Urban Studies, 14: 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwilliam, K. M. and D. J. Banister (1977). “Patterns of car usage and restraint modelling,” Transportation 6(4): 345–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartgen, D. T. (1974). “Attitudinal and situation variables influencing urban mode choice: some empirical findings,” Transportation, 3: 377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartgen, D. T. and G. H. Tanner (1970). “Choice of travel mode and considerations in travel forecasting,” Highway Research Record, 369.

  • Harvey, D. (1969). “Conceptual and Measurement Problems in the Cognitive Behavioural Approach to Location Theory,” in Cox, K. R. and R. G. Golledge, Behavioural Problems in Geography, North Western University Studies in Geography, No. 17.

  • Hill, W. F. (1972). Learning, University Paperbacks.

  • Hooper, P. O. and P. Mullen (1974). “The effect of Increased Fuel Prices on Car Travel,” Traffic Engineering and Control, 15(16/17),728–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. M. (1976). “An Investigation of Household's Response to Car Restraint and other Policy Measures,” Warwick: PTRC, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. M. (1977). “Forecasting Family Response to Changes in School Hours: An Exploratory Study,” Glasgow: UTSG, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. M. (1971). “Transport policy decision analysis: a decision theoretic framework,” Socio Econ Plan Sci, 5: 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. M. (1972). “Transport policy decision analysis: recent developments in the techniques of investment planning,” High Speed Ground Transportation Journal, 6(1), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. J. (1966). “A new approach to consumer theory,” Journal of Political Economy, 74: 132–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, C. H. (1975). “Modelling the modal choice decision process,” Transportation, 4: 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucarotti, P. S. K. (1974). “Car Availability.” Warwick: PTRC, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucarotti, P. S. K. (1977). “Car availability — the fundamental modal split,” Transportation Planning and Technology 3: 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, R. (1970). “Demand and choice models of modal split,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 4(2): 192–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercadel, M. (1970). “The Choice of Means of Transport — Psychological Motivation and Econometric Approach,” Transportation in France and in the World, 3rd Round Table of the ECMT.

  • Metcalf, A. E., J. Markham and B. P. Feeney (1977). “Elasticity of demand for petrol in Ireland: the evidence of cross sectional analysis,” Traffic Engineering and Control, 18(3): 119–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogridge, M. J. H. (1977). “An Analysis of Household Expenditures 1971–1975,” Warwick: PTRC, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, R. H. (1970). “A utilitarian theory of travel mode choice,” Highway Research Record, 322, 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N. (1975). “A Psychological Model of Travel Mode Selection.” Discussion Paper, University of Illinois.

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). “The experimental analysis of behaviour,” American Scientist, 45:343–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, A. N. (1970). “Towards a theory of traveller mode choice,” High Speed Ground Transportation Journal, 4(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. (1976). “A reinterpretation of the attitude approach to transport mode choice and an explanatory empirical test,” Environment and Planning A, 8: 793–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, H. J. and G. W. Pick (1967). “A model for trips generated by households,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1(2): 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Reading, USA

    David Banister

Authors
  1. David Banister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banister, D. The influence of habit formation on modal choice —a Heuristic model. Transportation 7, 5–33 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148368

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148368

Keywords

Search

Navigation