Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to link the propensity for innovative activity to spatially cluster to the stage of the industry life cycle. The theory of knowledge spillovers, based on the knowledge production function for innovative activity, suggests that geographic proximity matters the most where tacit knowledge plays an important role in the generation of innovative activity. According to the emerging literature of the industry life cycle, tacit knowledge plays the most important role during the early stages of the industry life cycle. Based on a data base that identifies innovative activity for individual states and specific industries for the United States, the empirical evidence suggests that the propensity for innovative activity is shaped by the stage of the industry life cycle. While the generation of new economic knowledge tends to result in a greater propensity for innovative activity to cluster during the early stages of the industry life cycle, innovative activity tends to be more highly dispersed during the mature and declining stages of the life cycle, particularly after controlling for the extent to which the location of production is geographically concentrated. This may suggest that the positive agglomeration effects during the early stages of the industry life cycle become replaced by congestion effects during the latter stages of the industry life cycle.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., and Feldman, J. P. (1992) ‘Real effects of academic research: Comment’, American Economic Review, 82(1), 363–367.
Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., and Feldman, M. P. (1994) “R&D spillovers and recipient firm size’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(2), May.
Arrow, K. J. (1962) ‘Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention’, in R. R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 609–626.
Audretsch, D. B. (1987) ‘An empirical test of the industry life cycle’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 123(2), 297–308.
Audretsch, D. B. (1995) Innovation and Industry Evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Audretsch, D. B. and Feldman, M. P. (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production’, American Economic Review, 86 (1).
Audretsch, D. B. and Stephen P. (1996). ‘Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology’, American Economic Review, 86 (3).
Browne, L. E. (1984) ‘High technology and regional economic development’, Economic Indicator, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
Edwards, K. L. and Gordon, T. J. (1984) ‘Characterization of innovations introduced on the U.S. market in 1982’, The Futures Group, prepared for the United States Small Business Administration under Contract No. SBA-6050-0A-82, March.
Feldman, M. P. and Florida, R. 1994, ‘The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(2), 210–229.
Feldman, M. P. (1994a) ‘Knowledge Complementarity and Innovation’, Small Business Economics, 6(5), 363–372.
Feldman, M. P. (1994b) The Geography of Innovation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Fuchs, V. R. (1962) Change in the Location of Manufacturing in the United States Since 1929, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., and Shleifer, A. (1992) ‘Growth of cities’, Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126–1152.
Gort, M. and Klepper, S. (1982) ‘Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations’, Economic Journal, 92, 630–653.
Griliches, Z. (1979) ‘Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth’, Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92–116.
Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Jaffe, A. B. (1986) ‘Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms, patents, profits and market value’, American Economic Review, 76(5), 984–1001.
Jaffe, A. B. (1989) ‘Real effects of academic research’, American Economic Review, 79(5), 957–970.
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. (1993) ‘Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63(3), 577–598.
Jovanovic, B. and MacDonald, G. M. (1994) ‘The life cycle of a competitive industry’, Journal of Political Economy, 104(2), 322–347.
Klepper, S. and Graddy, E. (1990) ‘The evolution of new industries and the determinants of market structure’, Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 27–44.
Klepper, S. and Miller, J. H. (1995) ‘Entry, exit and shakeouts in the United States in new manufactured products’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 567–591.
Klepper, S. and Simons, K. L. (1993) ‘Technological change and industry shakeouts’, Unpublished paper presented at the Annual Association of the American Economic Association, Boston.
Klepper, S. (1992) ‘Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle’, Unpublished paper presented at the 1992 Conference of the International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society, Kyoto.
Krugman, P. (1991a) ‘Increasing returns and economic geography’, Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499.
Krugman, P. (1991b) Geography and Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Krugman, Paul, (1991c) ‘History and industry location: The case of the manufacturing belt’, American Economic Review, 81(2), 80–83.
Loesch, A. (1954) The Economics of Location, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Lucas, R. E.Jr. (1993), ‘Making a miracle’, Econometrica, 61(2), 251–272.
Markusen, A., Hall, P., and Glasmeier, A. (1986) High Tech America: The What, How, Where and Why of Sunrise Industries, Allen & Unwin, Boston.
Romer, P. (1986) ‘Increasing returns and long-run growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 64, 1002–1037.
Romer, P. (1990) ‘Endogenous technological change’, Journal of Political Economy, 64, 1002–1037.
Shelburne, R. C. and Bednarzik, R. W. (1993) ‘Geographic concentration of trade-sensitive employment’, Monthly Labor Review, 3–13.
Thompson, W. R. (1962) ‘Locational differences in inventive effort and their determinants’, in R. R. Nelson, (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 253–272.
Vernon, R. (1966) ‘International investment and international trade in the product life cycle’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190–207.
Weiss, L. W. (1991) ‘The Geographic Size of Markets in Manufacturing’, in D. B. Audretsch and H. Yamawaki (eds.), Structure Conduct, and Performance, New York University Press, New York, pp. 64–91.
Williamson, O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, The Free Press, New York.
Winter, S. G. (1984) ‘Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5, 137–158.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Conference on Small Business Economics, 26–27 August, Rotterdam. We would like to thank Steven Klepper, Josh Lerner and the other participants on this conference for their helpful suggestions. All errors and responsibilities remain ours.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P. Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Rev Ind Organ 11, 253–273 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157670
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157670