Abstract
Thermoanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus Rt8.B1 exhibited hyperbolic growth (i.e. a continuous rate of growth, without diauxie, during growth and utilization of two carbon sources) on mixed carbohydrate substrates when grown in pH-controlled batch culture. Hyperbolic growth was observed with xylose in combination with either glucose or cellobiose. Diauxic growth ways observed when T. thermohydrosulfuricus Rt8.B1 was grown on a glucose plus cellobiose substrate mix. The major fermentation end-products under all substrate conditions were ethanol and acetate. Ethanol production varied depending on the substrate supplied and was always greatest on mixtures that included xylose (i.e. hyperbolic growth). High ethanol-to-acetate ratios could not be explained on the basis of a greater substrate uptake and thus more ethanol production under these conditions, or by variations in the levels of acetate kinase and NADP-linked alcohol dehydrogenase synthesis. The high ethanol-to-acetate ratio could not be increased by growing T.thermohydrosulfuricus Rt8.B1 under a partial pressure of hydrogen (1 atm) or by growth at different pH. Growth under these conditions decreased the ethanol-to-acetate ratio.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bahl W, Andersch W, Brown K, Gottschalk G (1982) Effect of pH and butyrate concentration on the production of acetone and butanol by Clostridium acetobutylicum grown in continuous culture. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 14:17–20
Ben-Bassat A, Lamed R, Zeikus JG (1981) Ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria: metabolic control or end product formation in Thermoanaerobium brockii. J Bacteriol 146:192–199
Bergmeyer HU (1974) Methods of enzymatic analysis, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York
Carreira LH, Ljungdahl LG, Bryant F, Szulczynski M, Wiegel J (1982) Control of product formation with Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus, enzymology and physiology. In: Ikeda Y (ed) Genetics of industrial microorganisms. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C., pp 351–355
Carreira LH, Wiegel J, Ljungdahl LG (1983) Production of ethanol from biopolymers by anaerobic, thermophilic, and extreme thermophilic bacteria: I. Regulation of carbohydrate utilization in mutants of Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 13:183–191
Cook GM, Janssen PH, Morgan HW (1993) Simultaneous uptake and utilization of glucose and xylose by Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum. FEMS Microbiol Lett 109:55–62
Donmez S, Ozcelik F (1992) Ethanol fermentation of beet molasses by Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum. Enzyme Microb Technol 14:413–416
Freier D, Mothershed CP, Wiegel J (1988) Characterisation of Clostridium thermocellum JW 20. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:204–211
Gottschalk G (1986) Bacterial metabolism. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Lacis LS, Lawford HG (1988) Effect of growth rate on ethanol production by Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus in glucose- or xylose-limited continuous culture. Biotechnol Lett 10:603–608
Lacis LS, Lawford HG (1991) Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus growth and product yield from elevated levels of xylose or glucose in continuous cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:579–585
Lamed R, Zeikus JG (1980a) Glucose fermentation pathway of Thermoanaerobium brockii. J Bacteriol 141:1251–1257
Lamed R, Zeikus JG (1980b) Ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria: relationship between fermentation product yields of and catabolic enzyme activities in Clostridium thermocellum and Thermoanaerobium brockii. J Bacteriol 144:569–578
Lamed RJ, Lobos JH, Su TM (1988) Effects of stirring and hydrogen on fermentation products of Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:1216–1221
Lovitt RW, Shen GJ, Zeikus JG (1988) Ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria: biochemical basis for ethanol and hydrogen tolerance in Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum. J Bacteriol 170:2809–2815
Patel BKC, Morgan HW, Daniel RM (1985) Fervidobacterium nodosum gen. nov. and sp. nov., a new chemoorganotrophic, caldoactive, anaerobic bacterium. Arch Microbiol 141:63–69
Patel BKC, Morgan HW, Daniel RM (1986) Studies on some thermophilic glycolytic anaerobic bacteria from New Zealand hot springs. Syst Appl Microbiol 8:128–136
Patel BKC, Monk C, Littleworth H, Morgan HW, Daniel RM (1987) Clostridium fervidus sp. nov., a new chemoorganotrophic acetogenic thermophile. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:123–126
Patel BKC, Hudson JA, Morgan HW, Daniel RM (1988) Nondiauxic fermentation of acid hydrolysed pine by a strain of Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum isolated from a New Zealand hot spring. FEMS Microbiol Lett 56:285–288
Patni NJ, Alexander JK (1971) Utilisation of glucose by Clostridium thermocellum: presence of glucokinase and other glycolytic enzymes in cell extracts. J Bacteriol 105:220–225
Payton E (1984) Production of ethanol by thermophilic bacteria. Trends Biotechnol 2:153–158
Pirt SJ (1975) Principles of microbe and cell cultivation. Blackwell, Oxford
Scopes RK (1982) Protein purification, principles and practice. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Slapack GE, Russell I, Stewart GG (1987) Thermophilic microbes in ethanol production. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla
Wiegel J (1980) Formation of ethanol by bacteria. A pledge for the use of extreme thermophilic anaerobic bacteria in industrial ethanol fermentation processes. Experimentia 36:1434–1446
Zeikus JG (1980) Chemical and fuel production by anaerobic bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 34:423–464
Zeikus JG, Fuchs G, Kenealy W, Thauer RK (1977) Oxidoreductases involved in cell carbon synthesis of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. J Bacteriol 132:604–613
Zeikus JG, Hegge PW, Anderson MA (1979) Thermoanaerobium brockii gen. nov. and sp. nov., a new chemoorganotrophic, caldoactive, anaerobic bacterium. Arch Microbiol 122:41–48
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Correspondence to: G. M. Cook
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cook, G.M., Morgan, H.W. Hyperbolic growth of Thermoanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus (Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum) increases ethanol production in pH-controlled batch culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 41, 84–89 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166086
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166086