Abstract
This paper asserts the continuing need for a long-range component to urban transportation planning, citing particularly the relationships between short- and long-range planning and the dangers of a single-minded concentration on short-range planning. However, the nature of the long-range planning procedure that is required is substantively different from that of most extant approaches. Some of the specific requirements and capabilities of a new procedure are described, and existing procedures are compared against these.
In the latter part of the paper, some of the elements of a new long-range planning procedure are characterized. It is suggested that the procedure be built around a scenario approach to confronting and bounding future uncertainty. Second, the need to incor porate financial forecasting in the process is laid out and related to the scenario concept. Third, the need for travel- and impact-forecasting procedures is recognized and a set of input, output and operating requirements for such procedures are specified. It is suggested that improved sketch-planning tools may fit the requirements to a large extent. It is also suggested that some procedures or models in the process should be “synthetic” models, not needing calibration for each new application. Finally, a number of requirements are specified for the display and evaluation of planning proposals from this procedure. A major emphasis is placed here on transparency of the process and responsiveness to direct intervention by the decision-maker.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkins, S. T. (1977). “Transportation planning: is there a road ahead?” Traffic Engineering and Control, 18 (Feb.): 58–62.
Beimborn, E. A. (1976). “Structured approach to the evaluation and comparison of alternative transportation plans,” Transportation Research Record No. 619: 22–26.
Bernard III, M. J., Millar, M. and LaBelle, S. J. (1978). “Transportation Energy Scenario Analysis,” Technical Memorandum 1 (April). Argonne, Ill.: Energy and Environmental Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory.
Chicago Area Transportation Study and Northwestern University Transportation Center (1976). Proceedings — Year 2000 Alternative Futures Conference, Chicago (November).
DeLeuw, Cather and Company (1974). Characteristics of Urban Transportation Systems, prepared for the US Department of Transportation (May).
Federal Register (1975). “Transportation Improvement Program,” 17: (September) 42976–42984.
Greenberger, M., Crenson, M. A. and Crissey, B. L. (1976). Models in the Policy Process. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Harris, B. (1960). “Plan or projection: an examination of the use of models in planning,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 27, 4, (November).
Holmes, E. M. (1973). “The state-of-the-art in urban transportation planning or how we got there,” Transportation, 1: 379–402.
Hudson, B. M., Wachs, M. and Schofer, J. L. (1974). “Local impact evaluation in the design of large-scale urban systems,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 40: (July) 255–265.
Knight, R. L. and Trygg, L. L. (1977). Land Use Impacts of Rapid Transit: Implications of Recent Experience. Prepared for the US Department of Transportation (December).
Lee, D. B. (1973). “Requiem for large-scale models,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 39: 163–178.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). “The science of muddling through,” Public Administration Review, 19, 2.
Manheim, M. L., Furth, P. and Salomon, I. (1978). “Responsive Transportation Analysis: Pocket Calculator Methods, Vol. I, Introduction to Calculator Methods,” - Working Paper CTS-RAMP-78–1, Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. (August).
McCarthy, G. M. (1969). “Multiple-regression analysis of household trip generation —a critique,” Highway Research Record, No. 297: 31–43.
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company, University of California, Stanford University, Gellman Research Associates, Inc., and Science Applications, Inc. (1976). Technology Assessment of Future Intercity Passenger Transportation Systems, prepared for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the US Department of Transportation.
Peskin, R. L., Schofer, J. L. and Stopher, P. R. (1975). “The Immediate Impact of Gasoline Shortages on Urban Travel Behavior," prepared for the Federal Highway Administration, (April).
Rae, J. B. (1972). “The mythology of urban transportation,” Traffic Quarterly, 26: 85–98.
Reichman, S. and Stopher, P. R. (1974). “Towards disaggregate, stochastic models of mode choice,” Highway Research Record, No. 369: 91–103.
Schofer, J. L. (1979). “Evaluating Transportation Alternatives,” Proceedings, Seminar on Emerging Transportation Planning Methods, US Department of Transportation, Daytona Beach, Florida, 1976 (forthcoming).
Simon, Herbert A. (1951). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. New York: MacMillan.
Skinner, L. E. (1975). “The Effect of Energy Constraints on Travel Patterns,” US Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation.
Sosslau, A. B., Hassam, A. B., Carter, M. M. and Wickstrom, G. V. (I978a). Travel Estimation Procedures for Quick Response to Urban Policy Issues, NCHRP Report 186. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board.
Sosslau, A. B., Hassam, A. B., Carter, M. M. and Wickstrom, G. V. (1978b). QuickResponse Urban Travel Estimation Techniques and Transferable Parameters, NCHRP Report 187. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board.
Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, (1978). “Milwaukee Area Primary Transit System Alternatives Analysis Prospectus,” Waukesha, Wisconsin, (October).
Stanford Research Institute (1976). Alternative Transportation Futures, prepared for the US Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary (June).
Transportation Research Board (1977). Urban Transportation Alternatives: Evolution of Federal Policy, Special Report 177.
Transportation Research Board (1978). “Technical Aspects of Alternatives Analysis,” proceedings of a seminar conducted by the TRB for the US Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Washington.
Weiner, E. (1977). “Evolution of Urban Transportation Planning.” US Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.: Urban Analysis Program, Office of Transportation Systems Analysis and Information, (revised July).
Weiner, E. (1979). “On the Future of Urban Areas and Urban Transportation Planning.” US Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.: Policy Analysis Division, Office of Transportation Economic Analysis. (February).
Wingo, L. and Perloff, H. (1961). “The Washington transportation problem: technics or politics?,” Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schofer, J.L., Stopher, P.R. Specifications for a new long-range urban transportation planning process. Transportation 8, 199–218 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169988
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169988