Skip to main content
Log in

The use of association analysis in market segmentation for public transport: a case study of bus passengers in West Yorkshire, UK

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bamford, C.G., Carrick, R.J. & MacDonald, R. 1984a. ‘Public Transport Surveys: a new effective technique of data collection’, Traffic Engineering and Control, 25, pp 318–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamford, C.G., Carrick, R.J. & MacDonald, R. 1984b. ‘The idea that rubbed off’. Marketing, 28 June 1984, pp. 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. & Sen, L. (1981). ‘An evaluation of public transport using marketing segmentation techniques’. Journal of Advanced Transportation, pp. 143–161.

  • Dawson, J.A. 1983. ‘Segmentation of the transit market’. Transportation Quarterly, 37, pp. 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R.E. 1974. ‘The design of market segmentation studies’ in Ferber, R. (ed.) Handbook of marketing research, Prentice-Hall, New York, pp. 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsack, P.J. 1984. ‘UK busy selling transit to riders’. Mass Transit 11, pp. 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, A.M., Bell WT. & Donnison R. 1982. ‘The use of automatic interaction detection methods in the study of trip rates ...;’ UTSG Conference Paper, Imperial College, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A. 1976. ‘Market segmentation as a mechanism in allowing for variability of traveller behaviour’. Transportation, 5, pp. 257–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovell, P.J., Jones, W.H. & Moran, A.J. 1975. The management of urban public transport: a marketing perspective. Saxon House, Farnborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. 1984. Marketing management: analysis, planning and control. Prentice Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutsopoulos, K.C. and Meyer, R. 1976. ‘Mass transit decision making market segmentation: a pilot study’. Technical Report 69, Urban and Regional Research Unit, University of Iowa.

  • Lance, G.N. & Williams, WT. 1965. ‘Computer programs for classifications (association analysis)’. The Computer Journal, 8, pp. 246–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R. 1985. Marketing Public Transport: a market segmentation of bus users in the Huddersfield area. Unpublished CNAA M.Phil. thesis, Huddersfield Polytechnic.

  • Meyer, M.D. and Miller, E.J. 1984. Urban Transportation Planning — a decision making approach. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oram, R. L. et al. 1983. ‘The fare cutter card: a revenue efficient and market-segmented approach to transit pass pricing’. Transportation Research Record, 947.

  • Sen, L. & Benjamin, J. 1979. ‘Travel behaviour and market segmentation of low and middle income residents of Richmond, Virginia’. Report No DOT RSPA 50–79–40–41 US Department of Transportation, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. 1956. Non-parameteric statistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W.R. 1956. lsProduct differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies’. Journal of Marketing, 21, pp. 3–8.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Williams,W.T. & Lambert, D. 1959. ‘Multivariate methods in plant ecology I’. Journal of Ecology, 47, pp. 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bamford, C.G., Carrick, R.J., Hay, A.M. et al. The use of association analysis in market segmentation for public transport: a case study of bus passengers in West Yorkshire, UK. Transportation 14, 21–32 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172464

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172464

Keywords

Navigation