Abstract
Neo-traditional designs, proponents argue, reduce dependency on the automobile and provide attractive environments for walking, bicycling, and transit riding. This paper explores the extent to which this proposition holds for seven traditional neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area that evolved around early streetcar services. Matched-pair comparisons of modal shares and trip generation rates for work trips are made between these neighborhoods and newer auto-oriented suburbs, controlling for the effects of income and, to a lesser extent, existing bus service levels. Pedestrian/bicycle modal shares and trip rates tended to be considerably higher, in some cases five time as high, in transit-oriented than in the paired auto-oriented neighborhood. Transit neighborhoods also averaged around 70 more daily transit work trips per 1,000 households than auto-oriented neighborhoods, though trip rates varied considerably among neighborhood pairs. Higher residential densities were also found to have a proportionately greater impact on transit commuting in transit-oriented than in auto-oriented neighborhoods. The paper concludes that in order to yield significant transportation benefits, neo-traditional development must be coordinated with larger regional planning efforts and public policy initiatives to reduce automobile dependency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bookout L (1992) Neotraditional Town Planning. Urban Land 51, 2: 10–15.
Calthorpe P (1993) The Next American Metropolis. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.
Cervero R (1984) Managing the Traffic Impacts of Suburban Office Growth. Transportation Quarterly 38, 4: 533–550.
Cervero R (1986) Suburban Gridlock. New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University Press.
Cervero R (1993) Transit-Supportive Development in the United States: Experiences and Prospects. Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C.
Demoro H (1985) The Key Route: Transbay Commuting by Train and Ferry. Glendale, California: Interurban Press.
Fehrs and Peers Assocites (1992) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Bay Area Trip Rate Survey Analysis. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, California.
Fishman R (1987) Bourgeois Utopias: The Rise and Fall of Suburbia. Basic Book, New York.
Fogelson R (1967) The Fragmented Metropolis: Los Angeles 1850–1930. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hall P (1988) Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Handy S (1992) Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Neo-Traditional Development and its Implications for Non-work Travel. Built Environment 18, 4: 253–267.
Harrison D (1978) The Impact of Transit Systems on Land Use Patterns in the Pre-Automobile Era. Cambridge: Department of City and Regional Planning, Harvard University, Discussion Paper D78-21.
Howard E (1898) To-morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform. London: Swan Sonnenschein.
Jackson K (1985) Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. Oxford University Press, New York.
Kulash W, Anglin J & Marks D (1990) Traditional Neighborhood Development — Will the Traffic Work? Real Estate Research Consultants, Washington, D.C.
Lerner-Lam E, Celniker S, Halbert G, Chellman C & Ryan S (1992) Neo-Traditional Neighborhood Design and Its Implications for Traffic Engineering. ITE Journal 22, 1: 17–24.
MNCPPC — Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission (1992) Transit and Pedestrian Oriented Neighborhoods. Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission, Silver Spring.
McNally M & Ryan S (1992) A Comparative Assessment of Travel Characteristics of Neo-Traditional Developments. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Irvine.
Middleton W (1967) The Time of the Trolley. Milwaukee: Kalmback Publishing.
Pisarski A (1992) Travel Behavior Issues in the 90's. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration.
Rabinowitz H, Beimborn E, Mrotek C & Gugliotta P (1991) Guidelines for Transit-Sensitive Suburban Land Use Designs. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration.
Schaeffer K & Sclar E (1980) Access for All. New York: Columbia University Press.
Stone J & Johnson C (1992) Neo-Traditional Neighborhoods: A Solution to Traffic Congestion? In: Paaswell E (ed) Site Impact Traffic Assessment Conference Proceedings. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
Warner S (1962) Street Car Suburbs. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
White Mountain Survey Company (1990) City of Portsmouth Traffic/Trip Generation Study. White Mountain Survey Company, Ossippee, New Hampshire.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cervero, R. Traditional neighborhoods and commuting in the San Francisco Bay area. Transportation 23, 373–394 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223062
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223062