Skip to main content
Log in

Wood fracture, acoustic emission, and the drying process Part 1. Acoustic emission associated with fracture

  • Originals
  • Published:
Wood Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Acoustic emission (AE) signals were collected during fracture tests in order to analyze them for characteristics that could be used as parameters in a reactive control system for the wood drying process. Ponderosa pine and California black oak single edge notch tensile specimens were tested in the TR, TL, and mixed mode configurations, at 12 and 18 percent moisture content and at temperatures of 20, 40 and 60 °C. AE was observed in both opening mode and mixed mode tests, but cumulative events to maximum load in mixed mode were 7.4 times greater than in opening mode for oak and 3.4 times greater in pine. It was concluded that mixed mode AE signals were most promising for pattern recognition analysis, which will be the subject of Part II of this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Booker, J. D. 1994a. Acoustic emission and surface checking in Eucalyptus regnans boards during drying. Holz Roh-Werkstoff 52(6): 383–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker, J. D. 1994b. Acoustic emission related to instantaneous strain in Tasmanian eucalypt timber during seasoning. Wood Sci. Techn. 28(4): 249–259

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBaise, G. R., Porter, A. W., Pentoney, R. E. 1966. Morphology and mechanics of wood fracture. Materials Res. Stds. 6(10): 493–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Honeycutt, R. M., Skaar, C., Simpson W. T. 1985. Use of acoustic emissions to control drying rate of red oak. Forest Prod. J. 35(1): 48–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagawa, Y., Noguchi, M., Katagiri, J. 1980. Detection of acoustic emissions in the process of timber drying. Acoustics Letters 3(8): 150–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi, M., Kagawa, Y., Katagiri, J. 1980. Detection of acoustic emissions during hardwoods drying. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 26(9): 637–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi, M., Kitayama, S., Satoyoshi, K., Umetsu, J. 1987. Feedback control for drying Zelkova serrata using in-process acoustic emission monitoring. Forest Prod. J. 37(1): 28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogino, S., Kaino, K., Suzuki, M. 1986. Prediction of lumber checking during drying by means of acoustic emission technique. J. Acoustic Emission 5(2): 61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarles, S. L. 1992. Acoustic emission associated with oak during drying. Wood Fiber Sci. 24(1): 2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. W., Skaar, Ch. 1990. Acoustic emission patterns from the surfaces of red oak wafers under transverse bending stress. Wood Sci. Techn. 24(2): 123–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadanari, M., Kitayama, S. 1989. Waveform analysis of acoustic emissions generated in the wood-drying process. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 35(7): 602–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Schniewind, A. P., Ohgama, T., Aoki, T., Yamada, T. 1982. Effect of specific gravity, moisture content, and temperature on fracture toughness of wood. Wood Sci. 15(2): 101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaar, C., Simpson, W. T., Honeycutt, R. M. 1980. Use of acoustic emissions to identify high levels of stress during oak lumber drying. Forest Prod. J. 30(2): 21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, B., Schniewind, A. P. 1992. Elasto-plastic fracture mechanics of wood using the J-integral method. Wood Fiber Sci. 24(3): 364–376

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by USDA Grant No. 90-37291-5762

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schniewind, A.P., Quarles, S.L. & Lee, SH. Wood fracture, acoustic emission, and the drying process Part 1. Acoustic emission associated with fracture. Wood Sci.Technol. 30, 273–281 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229350

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229350

Keywords

Navigation