Abstract
The perception of viscosity was studied using the contralateral limb-matching procedure in which subjects adjusted the viscosity of a motor connected to the wrist of one (matching) arm until it was perceived to be the same as that of the motor attached to the other (reference) arm. Two servo-controlled electromagnetic linear motors with computer-controlled viscosity were used to present viscosities ranging in amplitude from 2 to 1024 N · s/m to 11 subjects. Ten different viscosities were matched by subjects, and there were ten repetitions of each stimulus amplitude. The psychophysical function relating the reference to matching viscosity was linear (99% variance accounted for), and the accuracy with which the viscosities were matched (slope of 0.88) paralleled that reported previously for force, limb position and stiffness. The Weber fraction for viscosity was 0.34, which is 50% larger than that measured for stiffness and over twice that reported for force. An analysis of the movements and forces generated to perceive the reference viscosity revealed that subjects did not vary the amplitude of the movements and typically made very small excursions of the forearm, but that both the velocity of the movements and force changed significantly as a function of the reference viscosity. These findings were interpreted as indicating that the human proprioceptive system is capable of integrating information regarding force and movement velocity so as to perceive the viscosity of a mechanical system connected to the limbs, but that its sensitivity to changes in viscosity is much less than would be predicted from its capacity to detect variations in muscle force and limb movement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clark FJ, Horch KW (1986) Kinesthesia. In: Boff K, Kaufman L, Thomas J (eds) Handbook of perception and human performance, vol. 1. Wiley, New York, pp 13.1–13.62
Clark FJ, Horch KW, Bach SM, Larson GF (1979) Contribution of cutaneous and joint receptors to static knee-position sense in man. J Neurophysiol 42:877–888
Clark FJ, Burgess RC, Chapin JW, Lipscomb WT (1985) Role of intramuscular receptors in the awareness of limb position. J Neurophysiol 54:1529–1540
Clark FJ, Burgess RC, Chapin JW (1986) Proprioception with the proximal interphalangeal joint of the index finger. Brain 109:1195–1208
Clark FJ, Grigg P, Chapin JW (1989) The contribution of articular receptors to proprioception with the fingers in humans. J Neurophysiol 61:186–193
De Domenico G, McCloskey DI (1987) Accuracy of voluntary movements at the thumb and elbow joints. Exp Brain Res 65:471–478
Erickson RP (1974) Parallel “population” neural coding in feature extraction. In: Schmitt FO, Worden FG (eds) The neurosciences: third study program. MIT, Cambridge, pp 155–169
Ferrell WR, Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1987) The role of joint receptors in human kinaesthesia when intramuscular receptors cannot contribute. J Physiol 386:63–71
Ferrell WR, Milne SE (1989) Factors affecting the accuracy of position matching at the proximal interphalangeal joint in human subjects. J Physiol 411:575–583
Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1977) Changes in motor commands as shown by changes in perceived heaviness, during partial curarization and peripheral anaesthesia in man. J Physiol 272:673–689
Gandevia SC, Hall LA, McCloskey DI, Potter EK (1983) Proprioceptive sensation at the terminal joint of the middle finger. J Physiol 335:507–517
Gescheider GA (1985) Psychophysics: method, theory, and application, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Hollins M, Goble AK (1988) Perception of the length of voluntary movements. Somatosens Res 5:335–348
Houk JC, Rymer WZ, Crago PE (1981) Dependence of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity. J Neurophysiol 46:143–166
Hulliger M (1984) The mammalian muscle spindle and its central control. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 101:1–110
Hunter IW, Kearney RE (1982) Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: variation with mean ankle torque. J Biomech 15:747–752
Jones LA (1983) Role of central and peripheral signals in force sensation during fatigue. Exp Neurol 81:497–503
Jones LA (1986) The perception of force and weight: theory and research. Psychol Bull 100:29–42
Jones LA (1989) Matching forces: constant errors and differential thresholds. Perception 18:681–687
Jones LA, Hunter IW (1982) Force sensation in isometric contractions: a relative force effect. Brain Res 244:186–189
Jones LA, Hunter IW (1983) Effect of fatigue on force sensation. Exp Neurol 81:640–650
Jones LA, Hunter IW (1990a) A perceptual analysis of stiffness. Exp Brain Res 79:150–156
Jones LA, Hunter IW (1990b) Influence of mechanical properties of a manipulandum on human operator dynamics. 1. Elastic stiffness. Biol Cybern 62:299–307
Jones LA, Hunter IW, Irwin RJ (1992) Differential thresholds for limb movement measured using adaptive techniques. Percept Psychophys 52:529–535
Matthews PBC (1988) Proprioceptors and their contribution to somatosensory mapping: complex messages require complex processing. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 66:430–438
McCloskey DI (1973) Differences between the senses of movement and position shown by the effects of loading and vibration of muscles in man. Brain Res 63:119–131
McCloskey DI (1981) Corollary discharges: motor commands and perception. In: Brooks VB (eds) Motor control. (Handbook of physiology: the nervous system, vol 2) American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 1415–1447
Milner TE (1986) Judgment and control of velocity in rapid voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res 62:99–110
Pang XD, Tan HZ, Durlach NI (1991) Manual discrimination of force using active finger motion. Percept Psychophys 49:531–540
Prochazka A, Hulliger M (1983) Muscle afferent function and its significance for motor control mechanisms during voluntary movements in cat, monkey and man. In: Desmedt JE (eds) Motor control mechanisms in health and disease. Raven, New York, pp 93–132
Roland PE, Ladegaard-Pedersen H (1977) A quantitative analysis of sensations of tensions and of kinaesthesia in man. Brain 100:671–692
Roll JP, Vedel JP (1982) Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res 47:177–190
Ross HE, Brodie EE (1987) Weber fractions for weight and mass as a function of stimulus intensity. Q J Exp Psychol [A] 39:77–88
Scott-Blair GM, Coppen FMV (1940) The subjective judgement of the elastic and plastic properties of soft bodies; the “differential thresholds” for viscosities and compression moduli. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 128:109–125
Stephens JA, Reinking RM, Stuart DG (1975) Tendon organs of cat medial gastrocnemius: responses to active and passive forces as a function of muscle length. J Neurophysiol 38:1217–1231
Stevens SS, Guirao M (1964) Scaling of apparent viscosity. Science 144:1157–1159
Watson JDG, Colebatch JG, McCloskey DI (1984) Effects of externally imposed elastic loads on the ability to estimate position and force. Behav Brain Res 13:267–271
Watts RL, Wiegner AW, Young RR (1986) Elastic properties of muscles measured at the elbow in man. II. Patients with parkinsonian rigidity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 49:1177–1181
Weiss PL, Kearney RE, Hunter IW (1986) Position dependence of ankle joint dynamics. I. Passive mechanics. J Biomech 19:727–736
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, L.A., Hunter, I.W. A perceptual analysis of viscosity. Exp Brain Res 94, 343–351 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230304
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230304