Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal variations of macroborers in massive Porites lobata on Moorea, French Polynesia

  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Massive colonies of Porites lobata on the barrier reef of Tiahura, Moorea, can be divided into four categories: living colonies, colonies consisting of 50% live coral and 50% dead skeleton, 100% dead coral and colonies which have been reduced to a basal plate. Replicate samples of each of these colony types were collected in the same vicinity of the barrier reef during October 1987. The macroborers were extracted, identified, counted and their volumes determined by displacement. Kruskal-Wallis tests showed that three different boring communities occur within these four categories of Porites colonies. Live colonies are characterised by only 3 species, the bivalve, Lithophaga laevigata; the vermetid Dendropoma maximun; and the non boring serpulid polychaete Spirobranchus. The completely dead colonies contain up to 17 boring species, with five to six individuals per 100 cm. Sipunculans are the dominant bioeroders with the most abundant species being Aspidosiphon elegans, sp A and sp B. Colonies of Porites which have been reduced to basal plates contain up to 18 boring species of which the bivalve Lithophaga hanleyana and the sipunculan Aspidosiphon sp. B are the most abundant.

The cumulative volume of CaCO3 lost by boring activity increases from 0.1 cm3 per 100 cm3 in a completely dead Porites colony to 1.4 cm3 per 100 cm3 in the residual basal plates of Porites. These can be extrapolated to minimum losses of 14.2 kg m-3. We suggest that rates of boring increase with the time which has elapsed since the death of the colony and the dominant agents of boring also change with increasing age of the coral structure. There are significant additional losses of 5.25 kg m-3 CaCO3 caused by grazing echinoids and scarids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bak RPM (1990) Patterns of echinoid bioerosion in two Pacific coral reef lagoons. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 66:267–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley RG (1978) Bioerosion of Bermuda reefs. Paleogeogr Paleoclimatol Palaeecol 23:169–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchon C (1985) Quantitative study of scleractinian coral communities of Tiahura Reef (Moorea, French Polynesia). Proc 5th Int Coral Reef Symp 6:279–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Done TJ, Dayton PK, Dayton AE, Steger R (1990) Regional and local variability in recovery of shallow coral communities; Moorea, French Polynesia and central Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reef 9:183–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillaume M (1990) Growth and calcium carbonate production of massive Porites. Proc Int Soc Reef Stud Nouméa 1990:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein F, Risk MJ (1975) Bioerosion of coral heads: inner patch reefs, Florida reef tract. Bull Mar Sci 25:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Highsmith RC (1981) Coral bioerosion at Enewetak: agents and dynamics. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 66:335–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings PA (1986) Biological destruction of coral reefs. A review. Coral Reefs 4:239–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings PA, Bamber L (1985) Variability of bioerosion rates at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef: preliminary attempts to explain these rates and their significance. Proc 5th Int Coral Reef Symp 5:333–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings PA, Peyrot-Clausade M (1989) Macro-boring communities of Porites. A biological comparison. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 3:263–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings PA, Kiene WE, Cunningham RB, Donnelly C (1992) Experimental investigation of bioerosion at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef-Part. I Patterns in the distribution and extent of non colonial boring communities. Coral Reefs 11:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiene WE (1988) Biological destruction on the Great Barrier Reef. Ph D, Australian National University, Canberra

  • Kiene WE (1989) A model of bioerosion on The Great Barrier Reef. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 3:449–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Campion-Alsumard T, Romano JC, Peyrot-Clausade M, Le Campion J, Paul R (in press) Influence of coral reef communities upon carbonate budget. Mar Biol

  • MacGeachy J, Stearn C (1976) Boring by macro-organisms in the coral Montastrea annularis on Barbados Reefs. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 61:715–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyrot-Clausade M, Brunel JF (1990) Distribution patterns of macroboring organisms on Tulear reef flats (S.W. Madagascar). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 61:133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Rougerie F, Wauthy B (1983) Anomalies de l'hydroclimat et cyclogénèse en Polynesia en 1982 et 1983. Met Mar 121:27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammarco PW, Risk M, Rose C (1987) Effects of grazing and damselfish territoriality on internal bioerosion of dead corals: indirect effects. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 112:185–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott PJB, Risk MJ, Carriquiry JD (1989) El Niño, Bioerosion and the survival of East Pacific reefs, Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:517–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Non-parametric statistic for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 312

    Google Scholar 

  • Sournia A, Delesalle B, Ricard M (1981) Premiers bilans de production organique et de calcification d'un recif-barrière de la Polynesie Française. Oceanol Acta 4:423–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis (second analysis). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NY, p 718

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peyrot-Clausade, M., Hutchings, P. & Richard, G. Temporal variations of macroborers in massive Porites lobata on Moorea, French Polynesia. Coral Reefs 11, 161–166 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00255471

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00255471

Keywords

Navigation