Summary
Aspenwood, wheat straw, wheat chaff and alfalfa stems were treated under pressure with either steam or ammonia. The material was then water or methanol/water extracted. The extent of enzymatic hydrolysis of the cellulose portion of the treated substrates was compared using two different cellulases, a commercial preparation, Celluclast, and those from the fungus Trichoderma harzianum. Both steam and ammonia treatment enhanced the accessibility of the cellulose as measured by hydrolysis. Methanol extraction of steamed material generally reduced the access of the enzyme to the cellulose, whereas methanol extraction of ammonia-treated material increased accessibility. The optimum combinations of pretreatment and extraction method depended on the substrate and on the enzyme system; no treatment suitable for all situations could be selected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackman RG (1972) Porous polymer bead packings and formic acid vapour in the GLC of volatile free fatty acids. J Chromatogr Sci: 10:560–565
Blotkamp PJ, Takagi M, Pemberton MS, Emert GH (1978) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and simultaneous fermentation to alcohol. AICHE Symposium Series181, 74:85
Brownell HH, Saddler JN (1984) Steam explosion pretreatments for enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotech Bioeng Symp 14:55–68
Craig W, Coxworth E (1986) A study of whole plant oils as a potential renewable fuel extender. ERDAF contract 01SG.01916-3-EL23. Agriculture Canada, Saskatchewan
Dale BE, Henk LL, Shiang M (1984) Fermentation of lignocellulosic materials treated by ammonia freeze explosion. Chapter 13 in Developments in Industrial Microbiology vol. 26
Dale BE, Moreira MJ (1982) A freeze explosion technique for increasing cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 12:31–43
Gong C-S, Chen LF, Flickenger MC, Tsao GT (1981) Conversion of hemicellulose carbohydrates Adv. Biochem. Eng. 20:93
Hogan CM, Mes-Hartree M, Saddler JN (1984) Effect of ethanol on the cellulase and xylanase systems of Trichoderma harzianum E58. Proceedings of the Third European Congress on Biotechnology. Munich, West-Germany pp II-395 a-d
Ladisch MR, Lin KW, Voloch M, Tsao GT (1983) Process considerations in the enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 5:82–102
Macris BJ, Paspaliari M, Kehos D (1985) Production and cross-synergistic action of cellulolytic enzymes from certain fungal mutants grown on cotton and straw. Biotechnol letts 7:366–372
Mandels M, Andreotti R, Roche C (1976) Measurement of saccharifying cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 6:21–33
Mes-Hartree M, Saddler JN (1983) The nature of inhibitory materials present in pretreated lignocellulosic substrates which inhibit the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol letts 5:531–536
Mes-Hartree M, Hogan CM, Saddler JN (1988) Influence of growth substrate on production of cellulase enzymes by Trichoderma harzianum. Biotech Bioeng 31:725–729
Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic reagent for the determination of reducing sugars. Anal Chem 31:426–428
Raabo E, Terkildsen TC (1960) On the determination of blood glucose. Scand Clin Lab Invest 12:402–406
Saddler JN, Brownell HH, Clermont LP, Levitin N (1982) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and various pretreated wood fractions. Biotechnol Bioeng 24:1389–1402
Saddler JN, Hogan CM, Louis-Seize G (1985) A comparison between the cellulase systems of Trichoderma harzianum E58 and Trichoderma reesei C30. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 22:139–145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mes-Hartree, M., Dale, B.E. & Craig, W.K. Comparison of steam and ammonia pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 29, 462–468 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269069
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269069