Skip to main content
Log in

Intimacy of disclosure topics and sex differences in self-disclosure

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 25-item self-disclosure questionnaire with items scaled for intimacy level was given to 32 male and 32 female college students. It was hypothesized that males would report disclosing less than females concerning intimate topics while there would be no sex differences in disclosure on nonintimate topics. The hypothesis was supported by the data. The results demonstrate that scoring self-disclosure scales by summing across all items can mask sex differences in disclosure patterns. Results are interpreted as supporting the assertions of several theorists that males reveal less personal information about themselves than do females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balswick, J., & Peek, C. The inexpressive male: A tragedy of American society. Family Coordinator, 1971, 20, 363–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, R. G. Methodological issues in self-disclosure research: “Would you like being a prostitute: Why or why not.” Paper read at Western Psychological Association, 1973.

  • Cozby, P. Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 79, 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, W. The liberated man. New York: Random House, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasteau, M. F. The male machine. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, R. Sex role pressures in the socialization of the male child. Psychological Reports, 1959, 5, 457–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourard, S. Self-disclosure in British and American college females. Journal of Social Psychology, 1961, 54, 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourard, S. Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York: Wiley, 1971. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourard, S. The transparent self (rev. ed.). New York: Van Nostrand, 1971. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourard, S., & Lasakow, P. Some factors in self-disclosure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958, 56, 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourard, S., & Resnick, J. L. The effect of high revealing subjects on the self-disclosure of low revealing subjects. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1970, 10, 84–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe: Free Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. A., & Altman, I. Intimacy-scaled stimuli for use in studies of interpersonal relations. Psychological Reports, 1966, 19, 729–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. Interpersonal probing and revealing and systems of integrative complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 655–664.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, B.S. Intimacy of disclosure topics and sex differences in self-disclosure. Sex Roles 2, 161–166 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287248

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287248

Keywords

Navigation