Abstract
The study investigated the cognitive engagement processes used by more and less successful learners in a computer problem solving game. These engagement variations were also related to sex and ability differences among students. Performance and engagement were monitored interactively as students learned a computer problem solving game; student comments and notes were also recorded. Results showed the records of more and less successful students to be distinguished by the spontaneous use of self-regulated learning processes — a sophisticated form of cognitive engagement. More successful students also appeared to shift cognitive engagement levels in response to computer game feedback. Success on the computer task and cognitive engagement variations were correlated with student differences in both ability and sex in this sample.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, A. L., Palincsar, A. S., & Armbruster, B. B. Instructing comprehension-fostering activities in interactive learning situations. In H. Mandl, N. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning from texts. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1984.
Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 1978, 2, 155–192.
Burton, R. R., & Brown, J. S. An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1979, 11, 5–24.
Cattell, R. B. Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1971.
Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 1983, 18, 88–108.
Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington, 1977.
Flavell, J. H. Cognitive monitoring. In P. Dickson (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
Glass, G. V. Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. In L. S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 5). Itasca, Ill.: Peacock, 1978.
Greene, M. Landscapes of learning. New York: Teachers College Press, 1978.
Hess, R. D., Miura, I. T. Gender differences in enrollment in computer camps and classes. Sex Roles, 1985, 13, 193–203.
Lepper, M. R., & Malone, T. W. Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitudes, learning and instruction (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, in press.
Linn, M. C. Fostering equitable consequences from computer learning environments. Sex Roles, 1985, 13, 229–240.
Linn, M. C., & Dalbey, J. Cognitive consequences of programming: Influences of instructional setting, student access, and student ability. Berkeley: University of California, Lawrence Hall of Science, ACCCEL Project 1985.
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. A taxonomy of intrinsic motivation. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitudes, learning and instruction (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, in press.
Mandinach, E. B. The role of strategic planning and self-regulation in learning an intellectual computer game. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Stanford University, 1984.
Mandinach, E. B., & Fisher, C. W. Individual differences and acquisition of computer programming skill. Berkeley: University of California, Lawrence Hall of Science, ACCCEL Project, 1985.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1984, 1, 117–175.
Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. Components of attention. Psychological Review, 1971, 78, 391–408.
Pressley, M., & Levin, J. R. (Eds.). Cognitive strategy research: Educational applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983 (a)
Pressley, M., & Levin, J. R. (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Psychological foundations. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983. (b)
Reder, L. M. The role of elaborations in memory for prose. Cognitive Psychology, 1974, 11, 221–234.
Slavin, R. E. Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 1980, 50, 315–343.
Snow, R. E. Aptitude processes. In R. E. Snow, P-A. Federico, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Aptitudes, learning, and instruction (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1980.
Snow, R. E. Education and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984, 76, 347–376.
Webb, N. M. Microcomputer learning in small groups: Cognitive requirements and group processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984, 76, 1076–1088.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was funded by the National Institute of Education, Grant No. 400-83-0017. Opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this study do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institute of Education. The authors wish to thank Marcia Linn and Charles Fisher for their helpful advice, and Susanne Lajoie who served as second rater. Mary Rohrkemper and the Education and Child Development doctoral students at Bryn Mawr College also provided critical suggestions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mandinach, E.B., Corno, L. Cognitive engagement variations among students of different ability level and sex in a computer problem solving game. Sex Roles 13, 241–251 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287914
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287914