Abstract
This study examines the effect on perceived competence of colors and layers in traditional business attire. Forty-five St. Ambrose College Master's in Business Administration program students (11 female, 34 male) judged eight artist's sketches of prospective job applicants varying in sex, color of suit worn (red or blue) and presence or absence of a jacket (layering). Analysis of variance results confirmed hypotheses that a person wearing blue or a jacket was perceived as more competent and properly dressed than a person wearing red or no jacket. Furthermore, these variables had more impact on the perception of male targets than of female targets. Finally, although males with blue jackets were rated most highly, female targets were rated more favorably than males overall. Apparently, while only a particular style of dress is considered suitable for men, a specific business uniform does not yet seem to have fully emerged for women. What has emerged as suitable dress for women seems to be to merely adopt, to some extent, traditional male attire.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cash, T. F. The impact of grooming style on the evaluation of women in management. In M. R. Solomon (Ed.), The psychology of fashion. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1985.
Forsythe, S., Drake, M., & Hogan, J. Influence of clothing attributes on the perception of personal characteristics. In M. R. Solomon (Ed.), The psychology of fashion, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1985.
Gibbins, K., & Coney, J. R. Meaning of physical dimension of women's clothing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981, 53(3), 720–722.
Hamid, P. N. Some effects of dress cues on observational accuracy, perceptual estimate, and impression formulation. Journal of Social Psychology, 1972, 86, 279–289.
Harragan, B. L. Games mother never taught you: Corporate gamesmanship for women. New York: Warner Books, 1977.
Harris, M. B., & Bays, G. Altruism and sex roles. Psychological Reports, 1973, 32, 1002.
Hatfield, J. T., & Gatewood, R. D. Nonverbal cues in the selection interview. Personnel Administration, 1978, 23(1), 30–37.
Heilman, M. E., & Saruwatari, L. R. When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on the evaluation of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979, 23, 360–372.
Jackson, L. A. The influence of sex, physical attractiveness, sex role, and occupational sex-linkage on perceptions of occupational suitability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1983, 13(1), 31–44.
Kaiser, S. The social psychology of clothing and personal adorment. New York: MacMillan, 1985.
Lefkowtiz, M., Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. Status factors in pedestrian violation of traffic signals, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959, 51, 704–706.
Lurie, A. The language of clothes. New York: Random House, 1981.
Molloy, J. T. The women's dress for success book. New York: Warner Books, 1977.
Molloy, J. T. Dress for success. New York: Warner Books, 1978.
Noesjirwan, J. A., & Crawford, J. M. Variations in perceptions of clothing as a function of dress form and viewer's social community. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982, 54(1), 155–163.
Rosenfeld, L. B., & Plax, T. G. Clothing as communication. Journal of Communication, 1977, 27, 24–31.
Rucker, M., Taber, D., & Harrison, A. The effect of clothing variation on first impression of female job applicants: What to wear when. Social Behavior and Personality, 1981, 9(1), 54–64.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. Who likes competent women? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1972, 2(3), 197–213.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Carolyn Pillers and Michael Jerin for their help in data analysis and Rachel Chouteau for the preparation of artistic materials.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scherbaum, C.J., Shepherd, D.H. Dressing for success: Effects of color and layering on perceptions of women in business. Sex Roles 16, 391–399 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289550
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289550