Skip to main content
Log in

The aesthetic attractivity of the golden section

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

It is hypothesized that the presence of a golden section does not in and of itself add to the aesthetic attractivity of a pattern. Only as far as the realization of a golden section entails equivalences between parts of a pattern, will the aesthetic appeal of a pattern be enhanced. An experiment is reported in which this hypothesis is tested and confirmed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow H, Reeves B (1979) The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays. Vis Res 19:783–793

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjafield J (1976) The ‘golden rectangle’: Some new data. Am J Psychol 89:737–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne D (1971) Aesthetics and Psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Borissavliévitch M (1958) Golden Number. Tiranti, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce VG, Morgan MJ (1975) Violations of symmetry and repetition in visual patterns. Perception 4:239–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Corballis MC, Roldan CE (1975) Detection of symmetry as a function of angular orientation. J Exp Psychol: Human percpt perform 1:221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner G (1876) Vorschule der Ästhetik. Breitkopf und Härtel, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensom DS (1981) The golden section and human evolution. Leonardo 14:232–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischler R (1981) On the application of the golden ratio in the visual arts. Leonardo 14:31–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith CD (1976) The detection of structure in visual displays. Acta Psychol 40:115–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Godkewitsch M (1974) The golden section: an artifact of stimulus range and measure of preference. Am J Psychol 87:269–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintz JM, Nelson TM (1970) Golden section: reassessment of the perimetric hypothesis. Am J Psychol 83:126–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg J (1978) Art and perception. In: Carterette EC, Friedman MP (Eds), Handbook of perception, Volume X, Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley HE (1970) The divine proportion. A study in mathematical beauty. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz B (1971) Foundations of cyclopean perception. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwenberg E (1971) A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns. Am J Psychol 84:307–349

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus IC (1980) The aesthetics of simple figures. Br J Psychol 71:505–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J (1961) Les mécanismes perceptifs. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Plug C (1980) The golden section hypothesis. Am J Psychol 93:467–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Restle F (1982) Coding theory as an integration of Gestalt psychology and information processing theory. In: Beck J (Ed) Organization and representation in perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone LA, Collins LG (1965) The golden section revisited. Am J Psychol 78:503–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Szilagyi PG, Baird JC (1977) A quantitative approach to the study of visual symmetry. Percept & Psychophysics 22:287–292

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boselie, F. The aesthetic attractivity of the golden section. Psychol. Res 45, 367–375 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309712

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309712

Keywords

Navigation