Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear transient response and its sensitivity using finite elements in time

  • Originals
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The bilinear formulation proposed earlier by Peters and Izadpanah to develop finite elements in time to solve undamped linear systems, is extended (and found to be readily amenable) to develop time finite elements to obtain transient responses of both linear and nonlinear, and damped and undamped systems. The formulation is used in the h-, p- and hp-versions. The resulting linear and nonlinear algebraic equations are differentiated to obtain the sensitivity of the transient response with respect to various design parameters. The present developments were tested on a series of linear and nonlinear examples and were found to yield, when compared with results obtained using other methods, excellent results for both the transient response and its sensitivity to system parameters. Mostly, the results were obtained using the Legendre polynomials as basis functions, though, in some cases other orthogonal polynomials namely, the Hermite, the Chebyshev, and integrated Legendre polynomials were also employed (but to no great advantage). A key advantage of the time finite element method, and the one often overlooked in its past applications, is the ease with which the sensitivity of the transient response with respect to various system parameters can be obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B:

bilinear term in the variational formulation

a:

linear term in the variational formulation

δ:

variational operator

T:

kinetic energy

V:

potential energy

Q i :

nonconservative forces not included in the variational operation

\(s_{_t } ,\dot s_{_t }\) :

generalized coordinates: displacement, velocity

T 0 :

initial time

T f :

final time

p k :

design parameters

q j :

generalized coordinates

{}:

column vector

<>:

row vector

References

  • Achar, N. S.; Gaonkar, G. H. 1993: Helicopter trim analysis by shooting and finite element methods with optimally damped Newton iterations. AIAA J. 31/2: 225–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelman, H. M.; Haftka, R. T. 1986: Sensitivity analysis of discrete structural systems. AIAA J. 24/5: 823–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, J. H.; Scharpf, D. W. 1969: Finite element in time and space. J. of the Royal Soc. 73: 1041–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Atluri, S. N. 1973: An assumed stress hybrid finite element model for linear elastodynamic analysis. AIAA J. 11/7: 1028–1031

    Google Scholar 

  • Atluri, S. N.; Cazzani, A. 1995: Rotations in computational solid mechanics. Archive of Computational Methods in Engineering 2/1: 49–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C. D. 1975a: A new look at Hamilton's principle. Found. of Physics. 5/3: 433–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C. D. 1975b. Application of Hamilton's law of varying action. AIAA J. 13/9: 1154–1157

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C. D. 1976a: The method of Ritz applied to the equation of Hamilton. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 7/2: 235–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C. D. 1976b: Hamilton, Ritz, and elastodynamics. J. of Applied Mechanics. 43/4: 684–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, M.; Riff, R. 1982: Hamilton's principle, Hamilton's law 6n correct formulations. AIAA J. 20/5: 687–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Borri, M.; Ghiringhelli, G. L.; Lanz, M.; Mantegazza, P.; Merlini, T. 1985: Dynamic response of mechanical systems by a weak Hamiltonian formulation. Comput. and Struct. 20/1–3: 495–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Borri, M.; Mello, F.; Atluri, S. N. 1990: Variational approaches for dynamics and time-finite-elements: numerical studies. Comp. Mech. 7: 49–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Borri, M.; Mello, F.; Atluri, S. N. 1991: Primal and mixed forms of Hamilton's principle for constrained rigid body systems: numerical studies. Comp. Mech. 7: 205–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Burden, R. L.; Faires, J. D. 1993: Numerical analysis. pp. 544–551. Boston: PWS-KENT Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X.; Tamma, K. K.; Sha, D. 1993: Virtual-pulse time integral methodology: A new explicit approach for computational dynamics — Theoretical developments for general non-linear structural dynamics. 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures. Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. La Jolla, California, April 19–22, 1993

  • Fried, I. 1969: Finite element analysis of time dependent phenomena. AIAA J. 7/6: 1170–1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurtin, M. E. 1964a: Variational principles for linear elastodynamics. Arch. Rational Mec. Anal. 16: 34–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurtin, M. E. 1964b: Variational principles for linear initial value problem. Quarter. of Applied Math. 22/3: 252–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftka, R. T.; Adelman, H. M. 1989: Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis. Struct. Optim. 1: 137–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftka, R. T.; Gürdal, Z. 1991: Elements of Structural Optimization. pp. 398–403. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, I.; Bielak, J. 1974: A simplified version of Gurtin's variational principles. Arch. Rational Mec. Anal. 53: 131–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitzl, D. L.; Levinston, D. A. 1980: Application of Hamilton's law of varying action to the restricted three-body problem. Celestial Mech. 22: 255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Mello, F.; Borri, M.; Atluri, S. N. 1990: Time finite element methods for large rotational dynamics of multibody systems. Comput. and Struct. 37/2: 231–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, D. A.; Izadpanah, A. P. 1988: hp-version finite elements for the space-time domain. Comp. Mech. 3: 73–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Pian, T. H. H.; O'Brien, T. F. 1957: Transient response of continuous structures using assumed time functions. 9th Congress International Mechanique Applied, University Bruxelles. 7: 350–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, J. N. 1975: A note on mixed variational principles for initial value problems. Quarter. of Applied Math. 27/1: 123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, J. N. 1976: Modified Gurtin's variational principles in the linear dynamic theory of viscoelasticity. Inter. J. of Solids Struct. 12/3: 227–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Riff, R.; Baruch, M. 1984a: Stability of time finite elements. AIAA J. 22/8: 1171–1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Riff, R.; Baruch, M. 1984b: Time finite element discretization of Hamilton's law of varying action. AIAA J. 22/9: 1310–1318

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu, R. S.; Pister, K. S. 1972: Variational methods in continuum mechanics. Proceedings of International Conference on Variational Methods in Engineering, Southampton University, England. 1.13–1.25

  • Shampine, L. F. 1994: Numerical solution of ordinary differential equations. pp. 398–403. New York: Chapman and Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkins, T. E. 1978: Unconstrained variational statements for initial and boundary-value problems. AIAA J. 16/6: 559–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkins, T. E. 1981: Finite elements for initial value problems in dynamics. AIAA J. 19/10: 1357–1362

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. V. Jr. 1979: Comment on “Unconstrained variational statements for initial and boundary-value problems”. AIAA J. 17/1: 126–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiersten, H. F. 1968: Natural boundary and initial conditions from a modification of Hamilton's principle. J. of Math. Physics. 9/9: 1445–1450

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomović, R. 1963: Sensitivity analysis of dynamics systems. pp. 82–89. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonti, E. 1972: A systematic approach to the search for variational principles. Proceedings of International Conference on Variational Methods in Engineering, Southampton University, England. 1.1–1.12

  • Wang, B. P.; Lu, C. M. 1993: A new method for transient response sensitivity analysis in structural dynamics. 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, La Jolla, California, April 19–22, 1993

  • Wu, J. J. 1977: Solution to initial value problems by use of finite elements-unconstrained variational formulations. J. of Sound and Vibration. 53/3: 341–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz, O. C.; Parekh, C. J. 1970: Transient field problems-two and three dimensional analysis by isoparametric finite elements. Int. J. of Num. Meth. Eng. 2: 61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz, O. C.; Morgan, K. 1983: Finite elements and approximation. pp. 231–265. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz, O. C.; Wood, W. L. 1987: Transient response analysis in Finite element handbook (H. Kardestuncer and D. H. Norrie, eds.) pp. 2.275–2.314. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by S. N. Alturi, 25 September 1995

Portions of this research were supported by a grant from Army Research Office, Grant No. DAALO3-90-G-0134, with Dr. Gary Anderson as the grant monitor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kapania, R.K., Park, S. Nonlinear transient response and its sensitivity using finite elements in time. Computational Mechanics 17, 306–317 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368553

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368553

Keywords

Navigation