Skip to main content
Log in

Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores possible connections between gender and the willingness to engage in unethical business behavior. Two approaches to gender and ethics are presented: the structural approach and the socialization approach. Data from a sample of 213 business school students reveal that men are more than two times as likely as women to engage in actions regarded as unethical but it is also important to note that relatively few would engage in any of these actions with the exception of buying stock with inside information. Fifty percent of the males were willing to buy stock with insider information. Overall, the results support the gender socialization approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Betz, M. and L. O'Connell: 1987, ‘Gender and Work: A Look at Sex Differences among Pharmacy Students’, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 51, 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutell, N. J. and O. C. Brenner: 1986, ‘Sex Differences in Work Values’, Journal of Vocational Behavior 28, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blauner, R.: 1964, Alienation and Freedom: The Factory Worker and His Industry (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, O, and C. Tomkiewicz: 1979, ‘Job Orientation of Males and Females: Are Sex Differences Declining?’, Personnel Psychology 32, 741–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R.: 1975, Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • David, D.: 1974, ‘Occupational Values and Sex: The Case of Scientists and Engineers’. (Unpublished paper presented at American Sociological Association meetings in Montreal, Canada.)

  • Feldberg, R. and E. Glenn: 1979, ‘Male and Female: Job Versus Gender Roles’, Social Problems 26, 524–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.: 1977, Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, D. E.: 1985, ‘Gender, Sex Role, and Career Decision Making of Certified Management Accountants’, Sex Roles 13, 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, W. B., J. L. Bokemeier, and J. M. Shepard: 1983, ‘Job Attribute Preferences and Work Commitment of Men and Women in the United States’, Personnel Psychology 36, 315–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lueptow, L. B.: 1981, ‘Sex-typing and Change in the Occupational Choices of High School Seniors: 1964–1975’, Sociological Education 54, 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lueptow, L. B.: 1084, Adolescent Sex Roles and Social Change (Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham, W. T., S. J. South, C. M. Bonjean, and J. Corder: 1985, ‘Gender and Opportunity in the Federal Bureaucracy’, American Journal of Sociology 91, 129–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shann, M. H.: 1983, ‘Career Plans of Men and Women in Gender Dominant Professions’, Journal of Vocational Behavior 22, 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statham, A.: 1987, ‘The Gender Model Revisited: Differences in the Management Styles of Men and Women’, Sex Roles 16, 409–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veroff, J.: 1977, ‘Process vs. Impact in Men's and Women's Achievement Motivation’, Psychology of Women quarterly 1, 283–293.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Michael Betz is Professor of Sociology at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. He has published articles on income inequality, accountability, gender and work, and job satisfaction. Currently he is working on the effect of gender on ethical decision making and accountability as a mechanism of social control.

Lenahan O'Connell is Assistant Professor of Sociology at Carson-Newman College. His research focuses on gender differences in work experience. He is currently studying discrimination law enforcement in addition to continuing research with Michael Betz and Jon Shepard on ethics at work.

Jon M. Shepard is currently Chairman of the Department of Management and Professor of Sociology at the University of Kentucky. His research interests include comparative management (particularly Japanese and American), ethics in business, the social responsibility of business, and the accountability of institutions in industrial society.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Betz, M., O'Connell, L. & Shepard, J.M. Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. J Bus Ethics 8, 321–324 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381722

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381722

Keywords

Navigation