Skip to main content
Log in

Economic consequences of animal rights programs

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Readily available data are used to provide relevant decision making information on the highly subjective issue of animal rights. Two examples of alleged crowding; cattle being finished in concrete lots, and broilers in confined operations were evaluated to determine the impact on producers and consumers from increasing space per animal. It is concluded that similar policy changes, such as doubling floor space, can lead to dramatic differences in economic impact depending on the industry affected. It is shown that economic analysis can provide valuable information in estimating the tradeoffs in moral issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, Eldon, ‘Elasticities and Price Flexibilities for Food Items’, Livestock and Meat Situation LMS-229, U.S. Dept. of Agr., pp. 22–25.

  • Cast, Scientific Aspects of the Welfare of Food Animals, Report No. 91, Iowa State University, Ames, 1981.

  • Harrison, Ruth, Animal Machine, Vincent Stuart Ltd., London, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, James and Peter Singer, Animal Factories, Crown Publisher, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, Bernard E., Animal Rights and Human Morality, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, Bernard E., ‘Definition of the Concept of Humane Treatment in Relation to Food and Laboratory Animals’. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems 1 (1980), 234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, James R., L. B. Baldwin, and F. S. Baker, Jr., Investment and Operating Costs for Two Types of and Three Sizes of Florida Feedlots, Bul. 817, Agr. Exp. Sta., Univ. of Fla., 1981.

  • Singer, Peter, Animal Liberation, Review Press, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Dept. of Agr., Livestock and Meat Situation LMS-230, December, 1979.

  • U.S. Dept. of Agr., Poultry and Egg Outlook and Situation PES-311, August, 1981.

  • Wildey, Howard E., ‘Poultry Production Systems in Georgia’, Georgia Cooperative Extension Service, Poultry Science mimeograph report, May, 1981.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

James R. Simpson is Professor and Livestock Marketing Economist at the Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, U.S.A. He was formerly President and Senior Economist of InterAmerican Research Associates, and Cooperative Advisor of the Cooperative League of U.S.A. He was Scholar-in-Residence at the Rockefeller Foundation, Villa Serbelloni at Bellagio, Italy, 1979 and Visiting Research Professor at Kyoto University, Fall, 1982. His most important publications are: James R. Simpson and Don Farris, The World's Beef Business and ‘Toward a Humanist Consensus on Ethics of International Development’, in Morris Storer (ed.), Humanist Ethics. He is also author or co-author of over 100 articles in professional journals and chapters in books on livestock, international development and ethics.

Bernard E. Rollin is Professor of Philosophy and Professor of Physiology and Biophysics at the Colorado State University. His book Animal Rights and Human Morality (Prometheus Books) was selected as Outstanding Academic Book, in Choice Magazine, 1981. Other important publications by him are: Natural and Conventional Meaning: An Examination of the Distinction (Mouton, 1976); Papers published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association; Poetics; Kant-Studien; and Perspectives in Biology and Medicine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simpson, J.R., Rollin, B.E. Economic consequences of animal rights programs. J Bus Ethics 3, 215–225 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382923

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382923

Keywords

Navigation