Skip to main content
Log in

Issues management and organizational accounts: An analysis of corporate responses to accusations of unethical business practices

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When external groups accuse a business organization of unethical practices, managers of the accused organization usually offer a communicative response to attempt to protect their organization's public image. Even though many researchers readily concur that analysis of these communicative responses is important to our understanding of business and society conflict, few investigations have focused on developing a theoretical framework for analyzing these communicative strategies used by managers. In addition, research in this area has suffered from a lack of empirical investigation. In this paper we address both of these weaknesses in the existing literature. First, we explicate Impression Management Theory as an appropriate framework for studying organizational communicative responses, paying particular attention to the concept of “accounts.” Second, we critique previous investigations of organizational accounts and discuss the major contributions of our study. Third, we propose a coding system and content analyze the accounts offered by managers from 21 organizations that were recently the targets of consumer boycotts. Finally, we report the results of our empirical investigation and discuss ethical issues related to organizational accounts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, Larry D.: 1984, “The Seven Deadly Sins of Corporate Doubletalk’, Business and Society Review Winter, pp. 41–44.

  • Beauchamp, Thomas L. and Norman E. Bowie: 1983, Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, James K.: 1979, This Business of Issues: Coping with the Company's Environments (The Conference Board Inc., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttny, Richard: 1987, ‘Sequence and Practical Reasoning in Account Episodes’, Communication Quarterly 35, Winter, pp. 67–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. Howard: 1984, Issue Management: Origins of the Future (Issue Action Publication, Stamford, Connecticut).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, Michael J. and Margaret L. McLaughlin: 1985, ‘Models for the Sequential Construction of Accounting Episodes: Situational and Interactional Constraints on Message Selection and Evaluation’, Sequence and Pattern in Communicative Behavior, R. L. Street Jr. and J. N. Cappella, eds., (Edward Arnold, Baltimore MD), pp. 50–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crable, Richard E. and Stephen L. Vibbert: 1986a, ‘Managing Issues and Influencing Public Policy’, Public Relations Review 11, Summer, pp. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crable, Richard E. and Steven L. Vibbert: 1986b, Public Relations as Communication Management (Bellwether Press, Edina, MN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupach, Willian R. and Sandra Metts: 1986, ‘Accounts of Relational Dissolution: A Comparison of Marital and Non-Marital Relationships’, Communication Monographs 53, December, pp. 311–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtler, Hugh, ed.: 1986, Shame, Responsibility and the Corporation (Haven Publishing Corp., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirsmith, M. W. and M. A. Covaleski: 1983, ‘Strategy, External Communications, and Environmental Context’, Strategic Management Journal 4, 2, pp. 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, J., D. E. Hewes, and M. S. Poole: 1984, ‘Coding Social Interaction’, in Progress in Communication Sciences B. Dervin and M. Voigt, eds., (ABLEX, Norwood, NJ), pp. 115–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, William C.: 1987, ‘Theories of Corporate Social Performance’, in Business and Society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation, S. P. Sethi and C. M. Falbe, eds., (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA), pp. 142–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Monroe: 1985, ‘Consumer Boycotts in the United States, 1970–1980: Contemporary Events in Historical Perspective’, Journal of Consumer Affairs 19, Summer, pp. 96–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Dennis E.: 1987a, ‘The Effectiveness of Marketing Policy Boycotts: Environmental Opposition to Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 51, April, pp. 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Dennis E.: 1987b, ‘Consumer Boycotts: Are Targets Always the Bad Guys?’ Business and Society Review 58, Summer, pp. 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, Robert A. and Stephen L. Payne: 1987, ‘Are Business Leaders Staging a Morality Play?’ Business and Society Review, Summer, pp. 22–26.

  • Giacalone, Robert A. and Hinda Greyer Pollard: 1987, ‘The Efficacy of Accounts for a Breach of Confidentiality by Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, pp. 393–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.: 1971, Relations in Public (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guetzkow, H.: 1950, ‘Unitizing and Categorizing Problems in Coding Qualitative Data’, Journal of Clinical Psychology 6, pp. 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harre, R.: 1977, ‘The Ethnogenic Approach: Theory and Practice’, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology vol. 10, L. Berkowitz, ed., pp. 283–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Robert L.: 1980, ‘Corporate Advocacy: An Application of Speech Communication Perspectives and Skills and More’, Communication Education 29, September, pp. 370–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Robert L. and Richard Alan Nelson: 1986, Issues Management: Corporate Public Policymaking in an Information Society (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Hazel: 1971, ‘Toward Managing Social Conflict’, Harvard Business Review 49, May/June, pp. 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Patrick: 1982, ‘Tactics of Confrontation’, in The Public Affairs Handbook, J. S. Nagelschmidt, ed., (American Management Associations, New York), pp. 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, Klaus: 1980, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidler, Harry W.: 1913, Boycotts and the Labor Struggle (Russell & Russell, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, William D.: 1983, ‘Corporate Doublespeak: Making Bad News Look Good’, Business and Society Review, Winter, pp. 19–22.

  • McLaughlin, Frank E.: 1982, ‘Public Interest Groups’, in The Public Affairs Handbook, J. S. Nagelschmidt, ed., (American Management Associations, New York), pp. 206–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, Margaret L., H. Dan O'Hair and Michael J. Cody: 1983, ‘The Management of Failure Events: Some Contextual Determinants of Accounting Behavior’, Human Communication Research 9, Spring, pp. 208–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, Margaret L., Michael J. Cody and Nancy E. Rosenstein: 1983, ‘Account Sequence in Conversations Between Strangers’, Communication Monographs 50, June, pp. 102–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olasky, Marvin N.: 1985, ‘Inside the Amoral World of Public Relations: Truth Molded for Corporate Gain’, Business and Society Review, Winter, pp. 41–44.

  • Pagan, Rafael D., Jr.: 1987, ‘Corporate Strategies for Effective Crisis Management’, in Business and Society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation, S. P. Sethi and C. M. Falbe, eds., (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA), pp. 432–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Lynn: 1981, ‘Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing Research 18, November, pp. 395–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, James E.: 1985, ‘Assessing the Nestle Boycott: Corporate Accountability and Human Rights’, California Management Review 27, Winter, pp. 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, Barry R.: 1980, Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations (Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Monterey, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonbach, Peter: 1980, ‘A Category System for Account Phases’, European Journal of Social Psychology 10, pp. 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Marvin B. and Stanford M. Lyman: 1968, ‘Accounts’, American Sociological Review 23, February, pp. 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P.: 1977, Advocacy Advertising and Large Corporations, (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P.: 1979, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Environmental Analysis of Social Issues and Evaluation of Business Response Patterns’, Academy of Management Review 4, 1, pp. 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P.: 1987, ‘Advocacy Advertising: A Novel Communications Approach to Building Effective Relations with External Constituents’, in Business and Society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation, S. P. Sethi and C. M. Falbe, eds., (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA), pp. 551–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelby, Annette N.: 1985, ‘A Typology of Communication Strategies for Corporate Advocacy’, Journal of Business Strategies 2, Spring, pp. 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, Nancy M.: 1979, ‘Accounts and Other Interpersonal Strategies in a Credibility Detracting Context’, Pacific Sociological Review, April, pp. 255–272.

  • Shipp, Shannon: 1987, ‘Modified Vendettas as a Method of Punishing Corporations’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, November, pp. 603–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Robert C. and Kristine R. Hanson: 1985, It's Good Business (Atheneum, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Guy D. D.: 1985, Managing External Issues: Theory and Practice (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, Seymour and Norman N. Bradburn: 1982, Asking Questions (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Franciso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, Gresham M. and David Matza: 1957, ‘Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency’, American Sociological Review, December, pp. 664–670.

  • Tompkins, Phillip K. and George Chency: 1983, ‘Account Analysis of Organizations: Decision-Making and Identification’, in Communication and Organizations, L. Putnam and M. Pacanowsky, eds., (Sage Publishing, Beverly Hills, CA), pp. 123–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, Scott J. and Stephen J. Grove: 1987, ‘Marketing Ethics and Techniques of Neutralization’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 433–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welles, Chris: 1986, ‘Why the E. F. Hutton Scandal May Be Far from Over’, Business Week February 24, pp. 98–101.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dennis E. Garrett (Assistant Professor, Division of Marketing, University of Oklahoma) is a co-author of Marketing Theory: Evolution and Evaluation (John Wiley and Sons, 1988). His articles have appeared in Journal of Marketing, Journal of Business Strategies, Business and Society Review, Journal of Marketing Education, and Communication Monographs. In 1987, he was selected as the Outstanding Professor on Campus by the University of Oklahoma Student Association.

Jeffrey L. Bradford (Graduate Student, Division of Marketing, University of Oklahoma) is completing his Ph.D. in Marketing in the College of Business Administration.

Renee A. Meyers (Assistant Professor, Department of Communication, University of Oklahoma) has published articles in Human Communication Research, Communication Yearbook, Communication Monographs, and Journal of Applied Communication. Her doctoral dissertation from the University of Illinois was selected as the 1987 Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation by the Speech Communication Association.

Joy Becker (Graduate Student, Division of Marketing, University of Oklahoma) is completing her M.B.A. degree in the College of Business Administration.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garrett, D.E., Bradford, J.L., Meyers, R.A. et al. Issues management and organizational accounts: An analysis of corporate responses to accusations of unethical business practices. J Bus Ethics 8, 507–520 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382927

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382927

Keywords

Navigation