Abstract
A vigorous debate has developed surrounding electronic surveillance in the workplace. This controversial practice is one element of the more general issues of employee dignity and management control, revolving around the use of polygraph and drug testing, “integrity” exams, and the like. Managers, under pressure from competitors, are making greater use of technologically advanced employee monitoring methods because they are available, and hold the promise of productivity improvement. In this paper, the context of electronic surveillance is described and analyzed from the perspectives of ethics, public policy, and managerial behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Applegate, L., Cash, J., and Mills, Q.: 1988, ‘Information Technology and Tomorrow's Manager’, Harvard Business Review (November–December), pp. 128–136.
Automated Times: 1987, Newsletter of the Coalition on New Office Technology 3, No. 1 (Boston, MA).
Coalition on New Office Technology (CNOT): 1989, Electronic Monitoring in the Workplace: Supervision or Surveillance? (Boston, MA).
DeGeorge, R. T.: 1986, Business Ethics (2nd Ed.), (Macmillan Publishing Co., New York).
Daft, R. and Weich, K.: 1984, ‘Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems’, Academy of Management Review 9, pp. 284–296.
Grant, R. and Higgins, C.: 1989, ‘Monitoring Service Workers via Computer: The Effect on Employees, Productivity, and Service’, Natural Productivity Review 8, pp. 101–112.
Is Your Boss Spying on You?, Business Week (January 15, 1990), pp. 74–75.
Marx, G. and Sherizen, S.: 1986, ‘Monitoring on the Job’, Technology Review (November–December), pp. 63–72.
Nussbaum, K. and du Rivage, V.: 1986, ‘Computer Monitoring: Mismanagement by Remote Control’, Business & Society Review (Spring), pp. 16–20.
Ottensmeyer, E. and Dutton, J.: 1989, ‘Interpreting Environments and Taking Action’, in Snow, C. (Ed.), Strategy, Organization Design, and Human Resource Management (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).
Susser, P. A.: 1988, ‘Electronic Monitoring in the Private Sector: How Closely Should Employers Supervise Their Workers?’, Employee Relations Law Journal 13, pp. 575–595.
Taylor, F. W.: 1914, ‘The Principles of Scientific Management’, reprinted in J. M. Shafritz and J. S. Ott (Eds.), Classics of Organization Theory (1987) (Dorsey Press, Chicago, IL).
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (OTA): 1987, The Electronics Supervisor: New Technology, New Tensions, OTA-CIT-333 Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Walton, R.: 1982, ‘Social Choice in the Development of Advanced Information Technology’, Technology in Society 4, pp. 41–49.
Zuboff, S: 1990, ‘Response to “The Case of the Omniscient Organization”’, by G. Marx, Harvard Business Review (March–April), pp. 20–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The future creeps in on small feet ... We do not awaken suddenly to a brave new world. (Zuboff, 1990)
Edward J. Ottensmeyer is Assistant Professor of Management at Clark University's Graduate School of Management, where he conducts research in competitive strategy, technology management, and social issues. His research has been published in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Policy Studies Journal, Growth & Change, and Policy Studies Review, and in edited volumes, the most recent of which is Strategic Management in High Technology Firms from JAI Press. He holds MBA and Ph.D. degrees in Management from Indiana University.
Mark A. Heroux is a software engineer at the Locus Computing Corporation, in Burlington, Massachusetts. His research interests include high-level security protocols in large-scale computer networks, and effectiveness in high technogy firms. He holds an undergraduate degree in Computer Science from Anna Maria College and an MBA from Clark University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ottensmeyer, E.J., Heroux, M.A. Ethics, public policy, and managing advanced technologies: The case of electronic surveillance. J Bus Ethics 10, 519–526 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383350
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383350