Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship between Machiavellianism and Type A personality and ethical-orientation

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Results of a study investigating the relation between personality traits and ethical-orientation indicate sex is not an good predictor for differences in Machiavellian-, Type A personality- or ethical-orientation. Intelligence is found to be positively associated with Machiavellian- and Type A personality-orientation but negatively associated with ethical-orientation. Machiavellians tend to have Type A personalities, but tend to be less ethically-oriented than Nonmachiavellians. Type A personalities are more ethically-orientated than Type B personalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Accounting Association, Committee on the Future Structure, Content, and Scope of Accounting Education (The Bedford Committee), Future Accounting Education: Preparing for the Expanding Profession, Issues in Accounting Education (Spring, 1986) pp. 168–195.

  • Armstrong, M.: 1987, ‘Moral Development and Accounting Education’, Journal of Accounting Education, 27–43.

  • Bartels, R.: 1967, ‘A Model for Ethics in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 31, 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommer, M., C. Gratto, J. Gravander and M. Tuttle: 1987, ‘A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 4, 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N.: 1988, ‘Accountants, Full Disclosure, and Conflicts of Interest’, Business & Professional Ethics Journal 5, 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoon, R. P.: 1969, ‘Niccolo Machiavelli and the Twentieth Century Administrator’, Academy of Management Journal 2, 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R. and F. L. Geis: 1970, Studies in Machiavellianism (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. R. and R. E. Welton: 1991, ‘Professional Ethics: Business Students' Perceptions’, Journal of Business Ethics 6(10), 451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and L. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 3(49), 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, W. E. and B. R. Cargile: 1987, ‘Ethical Perceptions of Accounting Students: Does Exposure to a Code of Professional Ethics Help?’, Issues in Accounting Education 2(2), 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmill, G. R. and W. J. Heisler: 1972, ‘Machiavellianism as a Factor in Managerial Job Strain, Job Satisfaction, and Upward Mobility’, Academy of Management Journal 1(15), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E. W., Jr. and L. S. Broom: 1988, ‘Attitudes Toward Ethics: A View of the College Student’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 617–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and H. P. Sims: 1978, ‘Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 63(4), 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisler, W. J. and G. Gemmell: 1977, ‘Machiavellianism, Job Satisfaction, Job Strain, and Upward Mobility: Some Cross-Organizational Evidence’, Psychological Reports 2(41), 592–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, R.E., J. A. Bellizzi and C. Fraser: 1988, ‘A Content Analysis of Ethical Policy Statements Regarding Marketing Activities’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(7), 771–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and L. B. Chonko: 1984, ‘Marketing and Machiavellianism’, Journal of Marketing 48, 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. A. Vitell: 1986, ‘General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 1(6), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, C.: 1993, ‘Ethical Development of Accounting Students, Non-Accounting Business Students and Liberal Arts Students’, Issues in Accounting Education 8(1), 86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. E., S. Grazioli and K. Jamal: 1993, ‘Fraud Detection: Intentionality and Deception in Cognition’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 18(5), 467–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, S.: 1991, ‘Marketing Ethics and Education: Some Empirical Findings’, Journal of Business Ethics 8(10), 625–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, M. D., R. Dalton and J. W. Hill: 1993, ‘The Organization of Ethics and the Ethics of Organizations: The Case for Expanded Organizational Ethics Audits’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahavandi, A., P. J. Mizzi and A. R. Malekzadeh: 1992, ‘Executives' Type A Personality as a Determinant of Environmental Perception and Firm Strategy’, The Journal of Social Psychology 132, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Flynn-Comiskey, A. I.: 1979, ‘The Type A Individual’, American Journal of Nursing, 1956–1959.

  • Ponemon, L. and A. Glazer: 1990, ‘Accounting Education and Ethical Development: The Influence of Liberal Learning on Students and Alumni in Accounting and Practice’, Issues in Accounting Education 5(2), 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. A.: 1992, ‘Ethical Reasoning and Selection-Socialization in Accounting’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(3/4), 239–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D. P. and R. E. Reidenback: 1988, ‘A Framework for Analyzing Ethical Issues in Marketing’, Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2(5), 4–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P. and R. Shaver: 1973, Measurement of Social Psychological Attitudes (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. P.: 1973, ‘Machiavellianism, MBA's and Managers: Leadership Correlates and Socialization Effects’, Academy of Management Journal 3(16), 404–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A.: 1993, ‘Ethical Perceptions of Marketers: The Interaction Effects of Machiavellianism and Organizational Ethical Culture’, Journal of Business Ethics 5(12), 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A. and S. J. Vitell: 1990, ‘Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternatives’, Journal of Macromarketing 1(10), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M. J. and C. Werner: 1985, ‘Relinquishment of Control and the Type A Behavior Pattern’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48, 688–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touhey, J. C.: 1993, ‘Intelligence, Machiavellianism and Social Mobility’, British Journal of the Society of Clinical Psychologist 1(12), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wall Street Journal: 1992, ‘Type A Mothers Are More Likely to Have Children With Their Personality Traits’, 72 N. 100 (March 5), p. B1.

  • Weaver, K. M. and O. C. Ferrell: 1977, ‘The Impact of Corporate Policy on Reported Ethical Beliefs and Behavior of Marketing Practitioners’, in B. A. Greenberg and D. N. Bellenger (eds.), Contemporary Marketing Thought (American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL), pp. 477–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, T. W. and D. D. Wolf: 1991, ‘Judgements of Marketing Students about Ethical Issues in Marketing Research: A Comparison to Marketing Practitioners’, Journal of Marketing Education, pp. 56–63.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business Administration, University of Tennessee, 38238-5015, Martin, TN, USA

    J. Michael Rayburn & L. Gayle Rayburn

Authors
  1. J. Michael Rayburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Gayle Rayburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

John Michael Rayburn is Professor of Marketing, The University of Tennessee at Martin. He earned his DBA and has extensive experience in the health care industry as administrator of a 1,000 bed hospital; a 174 bed state psychiatric hospital; and President and CEO of a 200 bed hospital system. He has numerous articles and presentations and is a member of several professional organizations. He has recently received two outstanding teaching awards [student and faculty vote], the outstanding service award [faculty vote], and excellence in research awards [outside peer review]. He has recently implemented a business ethics course in the school of business administration.

Letricia Gayle Rayburn, is Professor of Accountancy, Southeast Missouri State University College of Business Administration. She is also a Certified Cost Estimator/Analyst. She earned a Ph.D. in Accountancy and has had both public and industrial accounting experience. She is the author of over 120 published professional articles. Her book Cost Accounting: Cost Management Concepts, is published by Richard D. Irwin. She is also the author of another book entitled Financial Tools for Effective Marketing and co-author of a book entitled Financial Accounting. She is currently past president of the Management Accounting Section, American Accounting Association. She has served a three-year term as a member of the Board of Regents of the Institute of Certified Management Accountants of IMA, as a member of the Committee on Research of IMA and on various other AAA Management Accounting Sections, IMA, and AICPA Committees. Dr. Rayburn is a member of AICPA, Institute of Management Accountants, American Accounting Association, Beta Alpha Psi, and Beta Gamma Sigma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rayburn, J.M., Rayburn, L.G. Relationship between Machiavellianism and Type A personality and ethical-orientation. J Bus Ethics 15, 1209–1219 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00412819

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00412819

Keywords

Search

Navigation