Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Memory psychophysics

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The relationship between perceptual and cognitive processes has been a topic of increasing interest. This review focuses on the use of techniques and theory drawn from classical psychophysics and applied to the study of mental representation. Several issues including examination of the functions that relate remembered and perceived magnitude to physical intensity, the relationship of memorial to perceptual functions, the effect of time on the memorial function, considerations in the methodology of memory psychophysics experiments, the level of functional equivalence between memorial and perceptual representation, and the use of psychophysical techniques and theory in the study of visual imagery are addressed. While the data suggest that the relationship between remembered magnitude and physical intensity and between perceived magnitude and physical intensity can be described by power functions, a model capable of accounting for the behavior of the memory magnitude for all stimulus dimensions and at all time intervals has not yet been found. Several unresolved issues and typical difficulties with research in memory psychophysics are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algom, D. (Ed.) (1992a). Memory psychophysics: An examination of its perceptual and cognitive prospects. In D. Algom (Ed.), Psychophysical approaches to cognition. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algom, D. (Ed.) (1992b). Psychophysical approaches to cognition. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algom, D., Wolf, Y., & Bergman, B. (1985). Integration of stimulus dimensions in perception and memory: Composition rules and psychophysical relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 451–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. C. (1970). Psychophysical analysis of visual space. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. C., & Hubbard, T. L. (1992). Psychophysics of visual imagery. In D. Algom (Ed.), Psychophysical approaches to cognition. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. C., & Noma, E. (1978). Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. C., Wagner, M., & Noma, E. (1982). Impossible cognitive spaces. Geographical Analysis, 14, 204–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, M., Lundberg, L., & Tärnblom, S. (1960). On the relationship between percept and memory: a psychophysical approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1, 136–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D. R., & Vido, D. (1984). Psychophysical functions for perceived and remembered distance. Perception, 13, 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. L., & Overshiner, C. (1983). The role of mental computation in judgments of area and volume. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 593–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D., & Reisberg, D. (1985). Can mental images be ambiguous? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 317–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, E. L., & Richardson, J. T. E. (1980). The relationship between perceptual and memorial psychophysics. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 16, 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaSilva, J. A., & Fukusima, S. S. (1986). Stability of individual psychophysical functions for perceived distance in natural indoor and outdoor settings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 891–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaSilva, J. A., Marques, S. L., & Ruiz, E. M. (1987). Subject differences in exponents of psychophysical power functions for inferred, remembered, and perceived area. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 191–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaSilva, J. A., Ruiz, E. M., & Marques, S. L. (1987). Individual differences in magnitude estimates of inferred, remembered, and perceived geographical distance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 240–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, W., Park, J., & Casey, A. (1961). The current status of the size-distance invariance hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 58, 491–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falmagne, J. C. (1986). Psychophysical measurement and theory. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J. (1985). Psychophysical evidence for a shared representational medium for mental images and percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J. (1988). Is visual imagery really visual? Overlooked evidence from neuropsychology. Psychological Review, 95, 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J., Péronnet, F., Gonon, M. A., & Giard, M. M. (1988). Electrophysiological evidence for a shared representational medium for visual images and visual percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 248–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J., Weisberg, L. L., Monheit, M., & Péronnet, F. (1989). Brain activity underlying mental imagery: Event-related potentials during mental image generation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 302–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A. (1980). Levels of equivalence in imagery and perception. Psychological Review, 87, 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A. (1989). Principles of mental imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1986). Visual functions of mental imagery. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas, (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 11. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foltz, G. S., Poltrock, S. E., & Potts, G. R. (1984). Mental comparison of size and magnitude: Size congruity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 442–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gescheider, G. (1985). Psychophysics: Method, theory, and application. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilinsky, A. S. (1955). The effect of attitude upon the perception of size. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, G. (1979). Some demonstrations of the effects of structural descriptions in mental imagery. Cognitive Science, 3, 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, T. L. (1988). Temporal aspects of mental representation: A psychophysical approach. Doctoral dissertation, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, T. L. (1993). Cross-modality matching in mental psychophysics: Brightness and loudness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 1339–1357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, T. L., & Baird, J. C. (1988). Overflow, first-sight, and vanishing-point distances in visual imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 641–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, T. L., & Baird, J. C. (1993). The effects of size, clutter, and complexity on vanishing-point distances in visual imagery. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, T. L., & Kall, D., & Baird, J. C. (1989). Imagery, memory, and size-distance invariance. Memory & Cognition, 17, 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, T. L., & Stoeckig, K. (1988). Musical imagery: Generation of tones and chords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 656–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, T. L., & Stoeckig, K. (1992). The representation of pitch in musical images. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Auditory imagery. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intons-Peterson, M. J., & McDaniel, M. A. (1991). Symmetries and asymmetries between imagery and perception. In C. Cornoldi & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Imagery and cognition. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intons-Peterson, M. J., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. B. (1989). Sensory-perceptual qualities of images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 188–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. M. (1939). Confidence and speed in the two-category judgment. Archives of Psychology, 241, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K. (1988). Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 390–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, S. (1988). Memorial psychophysics for visual area: The effect of retention interval. Memory & Cognition, 16, 431–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerst, S. M., & Howard, J. H. (1978). Memory psychophysics for visual area and length. Memory & Cognition, 6, 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerst, S. M., Howard, J. H., & Gugerty, L. J. (1987). Judgment accuracy in pair-distance estimation and map sketching. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1978). Measuring the visual angle of the mind's eye. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 356–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1981). The medium and the message in mental imagery: A theory. Psychological Review, 88, 46–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imaging in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 148–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C. L., & Shepard, R. N. (1979). Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 579–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, S. M., Kinney, J. A. S., & Weisman, S. (1967). Distance estimates with filled and unfilled space. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24, 1007–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moar, L., & Bower, G. H. (1983). Inconsistency in spatial knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 11, 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, R. S. (1973). Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, R. S., & Bayer, R. H. (1976). Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 228–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, R. S., Bradley, D. R., Sorenson, M. H., Whiting, J. C., & Mansfield, D. P. (1978). Psychophysical functions for perceived and remembered size. Science, 200, 330–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye. Memory & Cognition, 3, 635–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S., Casey, J., Ziriax, J. M., & Silberberg, A. (1988). Random monotone data fit simple algebraic models: Correlation is not confirmation. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 417–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, A. W. (1974). Age changes in the Ponzo and filled-space illusions. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 315–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88, 16–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. K. (1974). Structural descriptions and the limitations of visual images. Memory & Cognition, 2, 329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. K., & Johnsen, J. A. (1975). Detection of parts in patterns and images. Memory & Cognition, 3, 569–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, D., & Chambers, D. (1991). Neither pictures nor propositions: What can we learn from a mental image? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 336–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (1991). Imagery and the brain. In C. Cornoldi & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Imagery and cognition. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1982a). Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. Psychological Review, 89, 305–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1982b). Structural representations of musical pitch. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., & Podgorny, P. (1978). Cognitive processes that resemble perceptual processes. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, M. A., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). On imaging and seeing: Repetition priming and interactive views of imagery. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 52, 366–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S., & Volkmann, J. (1940). The relation of pitch to frequency: A revised scale. American Journal of Psychology, 53, 329–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teghtsoonian, M. (1965). The judgment of size. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 392–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teghtsoonian, R. (1971). On the exponents in Stevens' law and the constant in Ekman's law. Psychological Review, 78, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teghtsoonian, R. (1973). Range effects in psychophysical scaling and a revision of Stevens' law. American Journal of Psychology, 86, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke, P. (1981). Distance estimation from cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 526–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. M. (1987). Remembrance of sounds past: Memory and psychophysical scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 216–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weist, W. M., & Bell, B. (1985). Stevens' exponent for psychophysical scaling of perceived, remembered, and inferred distance. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 457–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Y., & Algom, D. (1987). Perceptual and memorial constructs in children's judgments of quantity: A law of across-representation invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 381–397.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, 85721, Tucson, Arizona, USA

    Timothy L. Hubbard

Authors
  1. Timothy L. Hubbard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hubbard, T.L. Memory psychophysics. Psychol. Res 56, 237–250 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419654

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419654

Keywords

Search

Navigation