Abstract
We estimated the income elasticity of environmental improvements for a number of European data-sets. The value of this parameter is consistently found to be less than one, with few exceptions. Our findings are compared with state-of-the-art contingent valuation studies from other countries. We also compared our findings with those reported in the literature on charitable donations and corporate donations. These studies show a similar pattern; donations decrease as a percentage of income, as income increases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. J., B. Bolin, B. Costanza, P. Dasgupta, C. Folke, C. Holling, B.-O. Jansson, S. Levine, K.-G. Mäler, C. Perrings and D. Pinental (1995), ‘Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity and the Environment’, Forthcoming, Science.
BeckermanW. (1974), In Defence of Economic Growth, Jonathon Cape, London.
BergstromT. C. and R. P.Goodman (1973), ‘Private Demands for Public Goods’, American Economic Review 63(3), 280–296.
BoercherdingT. E. and R. T.Deacon (1972), ‘The Demand for the Services of Non-federal Governments’, American Economic Review 62, 891–901.
CarsonR. T. (1991), ‘The Kadadu Conservation Zone Contingent Valuation Study: Remarks on the Brunton, Stone and Tasmanian Institute Critiques’, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego.
CarsonR. T., R. C.Mitchell, W. M.Hanemann, R. J.Kopp, S.Presser and P. A.Ruud (1992), ‘A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting From the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill’, Anchorage: Attorney General of the State of Alaska, November.
CarsonR. T., N. E.Flores, K. M.Martin and J. L.Wright (1994), ‘Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods’, Discussion Paper 94-07, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego.
Chichilnisky, G. and G. M. Heal (1994), ‘Efficient Abatement and Marginal Abatement Costs’, Working Paper, Columbia University.
DasguptaP. and K.-G.Mäler (1993), ‘Poverty Institutions and the Environmental Resource Base’, Beijer Discussion Paper, 23. Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Academy of Sciences, Stockholm.
DorfmanR. (1977), ‘Incidence of the Benefits and Costs of Environmental Programs’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 67, 333–340.
European Commission (1994), ‘Economic Growth and the Environment: Some implications of economic policymaking’, Working Paper of the Commission Services, Brussels, 30 September.
Forss, M. (1993), Voluntary and Involuntary Provision of Public Goods under Complete and Incomplete Information, Diss. Åbo Akademi. Finland.
HanemannW. M. (1991), ‘Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?’ American Economic Review 81, 635–647.
Hanemann, W. M. (1994), ‘The Conceptual Underpinnings of the CV Method: Some Comments’, DOE/EPA workshop on using contingent valuation to measure non-market values, Herndorn, Virginia.
HoevenagelR. and H.Verbruggen (1989), ‘De waarde van het milieu: Verslag van een schriftelijke Enquete naar de betalingsbereidheid van Nederlandse huishoudens voor en schoon milieu’ [in Dutch]. Report R/89-09. Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
ImberD., G.Stevenson and L.Wilks (1991), ‘A Contingent Valuation Survey of the Kakadu Conservation Zone’, Canberra: Australian Government Printing Office for the Resource Assessment Commission.
KanninenB. and B.Kriström (1993), ‘Welfare Benefit Estimation and Income Distribution’, 2nd revision of Beijer Discussion Paper No. 20, Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm.
Klynderud, K. H. (1994), ‘Verdsetting av miljoforndringar i Aulivassdraget’ (Valuing Environmental Changes of the Auli-river), MSc thesis. Dept. of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.
KriströmB. (1990), Valuing Environmental Benefits Using the Contingent Valuation Method, Umeå Economic Studies No. 219, University of Umeå, Sweden.
LindenJ. W.van der and F. H.Oosterhuis (1988), ‘De maatschappelijke waardering voor de vitatiteit van bos en heide’ (The Social Valuation of the Vitality of Forests and Healthlands) [in Dutch with English summary], Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and the Environment, Leidschendam.
McFadden, D. L. and G. K. Leonard (1992), ‘Issues in the Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods: Methodologies for Data Collection and Analysis’, in Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Cambridge Economics, Inc.
Mäntymaa, E. (1994), ‘Valuing Environmental Benefits Using the Contingent Valuation Method’ [in Finnish], University of Oulu, Research of Northern Finland, Research Reports #109.
Mäntymaa, E. (1994), ‘Estimating the Total Demand for an Environmental Resource with Marginal Willingness-to-pay Amounts in a CVM-study’, University of Oulu, Research Institute of Northern Finland, Discussion papers in Economics & Business Studies, #12.
NavarroP. (1988), ‘The Income Elasticity of Corporate Institutions’, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 29(4), 67–75.
Oates, W. E. (1994), ‘Estimating the Demand for Public Goods: The Collective Choice and Contingent Valuation Approaches’, DOE/EPA workshop on using contingent valuation to measure non-market values, Herndorn, Virginia.
Panayotou, T. (1992), ‘Environmental Kuznets curves: Empirical Tests and Policy Implications’, Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University.
PearceD. W. (1980), ‘The Social Evidence of Environmental Costs and Benefits’, in O'RiordanT. and K.Turner (eds.), Progress in Resource Management and Environmental Planning, Volume 2, Wiley & Sons Ltd, London.
PommerehneW. W. (1988), ‘Measuring Environmental Benefits: A Comparison of Hedonic Techniques and Contingent Valuation’, in D.Bs, M.Rose and C.Seidl (eds.), Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 363–400.
Riera, P. (1994), ‘The Social Value of Areas of Special Environmental Interest in the Mediterranean Countries’, Paper presented at Seminar on Environmental Land Use in the Mediterranean Basin: An Economic Perspective, Zaragoza, Spain, February, 7–9.
Rudloff, M. (1994), CRPEE, Montpellier, France. Pers. Comm.
SinnH. W. (1986), ‘Introduction’, in D.Bs, M.Rose and C.Seidl (eds.), Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
SpaninksF. (1993), ‘Een Schatting van de Sociale Batan van Beheersovereenkomsten met Behulp van de Contingent Valuation Method’ [in Dutch], Mimeographed, Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
VerkoyenF. (1994), ‘Bentwoud: Een Onderzoek naar de Maatschappelijke Waarde van een Nieuw aan te Leggen Bosgebied’ [in Dutch], Mimeographed, University of Brabant, Tilburg.
WaltersA. (1975), Noise and Prices, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
WibeS. (1994), ‘Economic Growth and the Environment’, Working paper #188, Department of Forest Economics, SLU, Umeå, Sweden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kristrom, B., Riera, P. Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one?. Environ Resource Econ 7, 45–55 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00420426
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00420426