Skip to main content
Log in

The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Actions have been assumed to be cognitively represented by codes of relevant action features. Six experiments investigated whether irrelevant action features — conditioned response-contingent auditory events — are also coded and integrated into action codes. Subjects responded to visual stimuli by pressing a left- versus right-hand button or by touching a single key once versus twice. Responses produced certain action effects: tones on the left versus the right or tones of low versus high pitch. After subjects had some practice, an “inducing stimulus” was presented together with the reaction stimulus; this inducing stimulus shared features with the action effect of the correct or incorrect response. If action effects were integrated into action codes, inducing stimuli should activate or prime the associated response. Indeed, substantial effects of correspondence or compatibility between inducing stimuli and irrelevant action effects were found in a variety of tasks. Results are interpreted as evidence for an automatic integration of information about action effects and taken as support of an action-concept model of action-effect integration and stimulus-response compatibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlation-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1957). Conflict and choice time. British Journal of Psychology, 48, 106–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolles, R. C. (1972). Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning. Psychological Review, 79, 394–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiello, U., & Umiltà, C. (1987). Spatial compatibility effects in different sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 18, 276–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopher, D., Karis, D., & Koenig, W. (1985). The representation of movement schemas in long-term memory: Lessons from the acquisition of a transcription skill. Acta Psychologica, 60, 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiard, Y. (1983). The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harleß, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 38, 50–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1993a). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 270–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1993b). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 280–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1996). Towards an action-concept model of stimulus response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (in press). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S. T., & Erwin, C. I. (1976). Relation between programming time and duration of the response being programmed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 591–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S. T., Greim, D. M., Mendicino, C. M., & Koenig, R. S. (1979). Anatomic and environmental dimensions of stimulus response compatibility: Implication for theories of memory coding. Acta Psychologica, 43, 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S. T., Wyatt, E. P., & Lingo, W. M. (1974). Response programming in simple and choice reactions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 263–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Nissen, & Klein, (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167–201). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., Reeve, T. G., & Van Zandt, T. (1992). Salient-features coding in response selection. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior: Vol. 2 (pp. 727–741). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1905). The elements of psychology. New York: Seiler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C., Hall, C. S., & Bretnall, E. P. (1932). A disproof of the law of effect and a substitution of the laws of emphasis, motivation and disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 601–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1992). An integrated model of the Simon effect. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junça de Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 331–350). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E. L. (1969). Reinforcement — “The one ring”. In J. T. Tapp (Ed.), Reinforcement and behavior (pp. 47–62). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, D. J., & Proctor, R. W. (1990). Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxon, H. C. (1969). Historical introduction to the problem of reinforcement. In J. T. Tapp (Ed.), Reinforcement and behavior (pp. 1–46). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, P. (1984). Saccadic eye movements and visual stability: Preliminary considerations towards a cognitive approach. In W. Prinz, & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 121–137). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhard Hommel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hommel, B. The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychol. Res 59, 176–186 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00425832

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00425832

Keywords

Navigation