Abstract
Actions have been assumed to be cognitively represented by codes of relevant action features. Six experiments investigated whether irrelevant action features — conditioned response-contingent auditory events — are also coded and integrated into action codes. Subjects responded to visual stimuli by pressing a left- versus right-hand button or by touching a single key once versus twice. Responses produced certain action effects: tones on the left versus the right or tones of low versus high pitch. After subjects had some practice, an “inducing stimulus” was presented together with the reaction stimulus; this inducing stimulus shared features with the action effect of the correct or incorrect response. If action effects were integrated into action codes, inducing stimuli should activate or prime the associated response. Indeed, substantial effects of correspondence or compatibility between inducing stimuli and irrelevant action effects were found in a variety of tasks. Results are interpreted as evidence for an automatic integration of information about action effects and taken as support of an action-concept model of action-effect integration and stimulus-response compatibility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlation-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 137–153.
Berlyne, D. E. (1957). Conflict and choice time. British Journal of Psychology, 48, 106–118.
Bolles, R. C. (1972). Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning. Psychological Review, 79, 394–409.
Castiello, U., & Umiltà, C. (1987). Spatial compatibility effects in different sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 18, 276–285.
De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.
Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301–313.
Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.
Gopher, D., Karis, D., & Koenig, W. (1985). The representation of movement schemas in long-term memory: Lessons from the acquisition of a transcription skill. Acta Psychologica, 60, 105–134.
Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73–99.
Guiard, Y. (1983). The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 331–342.
Harleß, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 38, 50–73.
Hommel, B. (1993a). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 270–279.
Hommel, B. (1993b). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 280–290.
Hommel, B. (1996). Towards an action-concept model of stimulus response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (in press). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications.
Klapp, S. T., & Erwin, C. I. (1976). Relation between programming time and duration of the response being programmed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 591–598.
Klapp, S. T., Greim, D. M., Mendicino, C. M., & Koenig, R. S. (1979). Anatomic and environmental dimensions of stimulus response compatibility: Implication for theories of memory coding. Acta Psychologica, 43, 367–379.
Klapp, S. T., Wyatt, E. P., & Lingo, W. M. (1974). Response programming in simple and choice reactions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 263–271.
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.
Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung.
Posner, Nissen, & Klein, (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157–171.
Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167–201). Berlin: Springer.
Proctor, R. W., Reeve, T. G., & Van Zandt, T. (1992). Salient-features coding in response selection. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior: Vol. 2 (pp. 727–741). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461.
Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Thorndike, E. L. (1905). The elements of psychology. New York: Seiler.
Tolman, E. C., Hall, C. S., & Bretnall, E. P. (1932). A disproof of the law of effect and a substitution of the laws of emphasis, motivation and disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 601–614.
Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1992). An integrated model of the Simon effect. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junça de Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 331–350). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Walker, E. L. (1969). Reinforcement — “The one ring”. In J. T. Tapp (Ed.), Reinforcement and behavior (pp. 47–62). New York: Academic Press.
Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360.
Weeks, D. J., & Proctor, R. W. (1990). Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 355–366.
Wilcoxon, H. C. (1969). Historical introduction to the problem of reinforcement. In J. T. Tapp (Ed.), Reinforcement and behavior (pp. 1–46). New York: Academic Press.
Wolff, P. (1984). Saccadic eye movements and visual stability: Preliminary considerations towards a cognitive approach. In W. Prinz, & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 121–137). Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hommel, B. The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychol. Res 59, 176–186 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00425832
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00425832