Skip to main content
Log in

A two-component, non-aqueous route to silica gel

Code: A7

  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new means for generating silica gel has been developed. Simple two component systems comprising tetraalkoxysilanes and strong carboxylic acids such as formic acid can react rapidly to give transparent monolithic gels. The acid serves as solvent, water source, and catalyst for both hydrolysis and condensation. Water need not be present as an initial reactant; it is generated in situ during the reaction. The gelation reaction is at least two orders of magnitude faster than those conducted in conventional acid-catalyzed aqueous systems at comparable pH*. Kinetic evidence indicates a lowering of the activation energy of condensation reactions, believed to be associated with reaction of silyl carboxylates and silanol groups. Physical properties of the dry gels such as bulk density more closely resemble conventional acid-catalyzed gels than those associated with other rapidly gelling systems. Dry gels often exhibit porosity so fine that nitrogen (at 77°K) is not absorbed at significant rates. Independent evidence of porosity arises from comparison of skeletal and bulk densities, sample immersion in water and adsorption isotherms of CO2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith, D., Davis, P., and Brinker, C., Better Ceramics Through Chemistry IV, edited by Zelinski, B., Brinker, C., Clark, D., and Ulrich, D., (Materials Research Soc., v. 180, 1990), p. 235.

  2. Room temperature gelation times can be as long as months at pH values near 2. See, for example, Ref. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pope, E. and Mackenzie, J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 87, 185 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coltrain, B., Melpolder, S., and Salvain, J., in Ultrastruct. Process. Adv. Mater., edited by Uhlmann, D. and Ulrich, D., (Wiley: New York, 1992), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sakka, S., Kozuka, H., and Kim, S.-H., Ultrastructure Processing of Advanced Ceramics edited by Mackenzie, J. and Ulrich, D., (Wiley: New York, 1988) p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sanchez, C., Livage, J., Henry, M., and Babonneau, F., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 100, 65 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sumrell, G. and Ham, G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78, 5573 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aelion, R., Loebel, A., and Eirich, F., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72, 5705 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karmaker, R., De, G., Kundu, D., and Ganguli, D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 135, 29 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. That is, at comparable r and measured solution pH. a 3:1 molar mixture with TEOS shows an initial pH* of 1.3 evolving to a value of ca. 1.8 close to the gel point. 96% formic acid has a pH* of 0.7±0.4.

  11. r is taken to be the mole ratio of the carboxylic acid to silane; any water present is not included in the calculation.

  12. Gottardi, V., et al., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 63, 71. (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bechtold, M.F., Mahler, W., and Schunn, R., J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed. 18, 2823 (1980). These workers demonstrated that activation energy is a function of the molar composition of the system, with lower values at lower water: silane ratios. pH and the silica concentration are also likely influential on Arrhenius parameters. The value of 7.5 kcal/mole is extrapolated from the data provided in the paper.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Some allowance must be made for the powerful condensation-retarding effects of donor solvents such as THF when used to dissolve solid carboxylic acids.

  15. See Ref. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McFarlane, W. and Seaby, J., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin II 1972, 1563.

  17. Emblem, H., Hargreaves, K., and Oxley, C., J. Appl. Chem. 18, 97 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Measurement made by D. Smith at the Univ. of New Mexico.

  19. Measurement at the Du Pont Co. by L. Abrams.

  20. Farenholtz, W., Smith, D., and Hua, D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 144, 45 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marsh, H. and Wynne-Jones, W., Carbon 1, 269 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barnham, H. and Clark, L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73, 4638 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vega, A. and Scherer, G., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 111, 153 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Densities were determined using a Mettler-Parr DMA 35 density meter, with digital display of both density and temperature.

  25. Scherer, G., private communication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharp, K.G. A two-component, non-aqueous route to silica gel. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 2, 35–41 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486210

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486210

Keywords

Navigation