Skip to main content
Log in

Stress in aerogel during depressurization of autoclave: II. Silica gels

  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although supercritical drying avoids the capillary stresses that tend to warp and crack xerogels, there are other sources of stress that interfere with the preparation of monolithic aerogels. In this paper, we present experimental results showing that there is a limit to the rate at which the pressure can be released from the autoclave without causing cracking, and that the maximum rate decreases as the gel size increases. Using an analysis developed in a companion paper, the stresses generated during depressurization are compared to the modulus of rupture of our aerogels. The calculations require knowledge of the pressure-dependence of the density of the vapor (ethanol, in our experiments), as well as the permeability and modulus of the gel network. Measurements of those properties were performed on a series of silica gels made under basic and neutral conditions. We find that the calculated stresses are large enough to account for the cracking of our gels at high rates of depressurization; moreover, the predicted dependence of stress on gel diameter is in agreement with experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Phalippou, J., Woignier, T., and Prassas, M., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 3111–3117 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scherer, G.W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 [1] 3–14 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scherer, G.W., J. Sol-Gel Sci. Tech. 3, 127–139 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prassas, M., Phalippou, J., and Zarzycki, J., J. Mater. Sci. 19, 1656–1665 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Woignier, T., Hdach, H., Phalippou, J., and Scherer, G.W., pp. 1087–1099 in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry IV, eds. Brian J.J. Zelinski, C.J. Brinker, D.E. Clark, D.R. Ulrich (Mat. Res. Soc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scherer, G.W., Hdach, H., and Phalippou, J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 130, 157–170 (1991); correction 136, 269 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scherer, G.W., J. Sol-Gel Sci. Tech. 3, 31–41 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Étienne, P., Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Montpellier II (January, 1993).

  9. Roche, A., Dumas, J., Quinson, J.F., and Romand, M., in Mechanics and Mechanisms of Damage in Composite and Multi-Materials, ed. D. Baptiste (Mechanical Eng. Publ., London, 1991), pp. 269–299.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scherer, G.W., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 142 [1–2] 18–35 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scherer, G.W., J. Sol-Gel Sci. Tech. 2, 199–204 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Woignier, T., Phalippou, J., Larnac, G., Pernot, F., and Scherer, G.W., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 147, 672–680 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klinkenberg, L.J., Drill. & Prod. Proc. API, 200–213 (1941).

  14. Stumpf, C., Gässler, K.V., Reichenauer, G., and Fricke, J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 145, 180–184 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ho, C.Y., Properties of Inorganic and Organic Fluids (Hemisphere, New York, 1988) Ch. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duffours, L., Pernot, F., Woignier, T., Alaoui, A., and Phalippou, J., “Weibull analysis of the mechanical strength of silica gels”, accepted for publication in J. Sol-Gel Sci. Tech.

  17. Scherer, G.W., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 145, 33–40 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woignier, T., Scherer, G.W. & Alaoui, A. Stress in aerogel during depressurization of autoclave: II. Silica gels. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 3, 141–150 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486720

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486720

Keywords

Navigation