Skip to main content
Log in

Same and different: Some consequences for syntax and semantics

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Bach, Emmon: 1977, ‘Review of Paul Postal's On Raising’,Language 53, 621–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon and John Perry: 1983,Situations and Attitudes, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brame, Michael: 1976,Conjectures and Refutations in Syntax and Semantics, North-Holland, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg: 1984, ‘Thematic Roles and their Role in Semantic Interpretation’,Linguistics 22, 259–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro: 1984,Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, unpublished University of Massachusetts at Amherst Ph.D. Dissertation.

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robin: 1984,Quantification and Syntactic Theory, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creary, L.: 1983,NLFT: A Language of Thought for Reasoning about Actions, unpublished working paper, AI Laboratory in the Computer Science Department, Stanford University.

  • Dowty, David: 1985, ‘On Recent Analyses of the Semantics of Control’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 291–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: 1980,Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1984,Where Does the Definiteness Restriction Apply: Evidence from the Definiteness of Variables, University of Texas at Austin unpublished paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1981, ‘Reciprical Interpretation’,Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 000–000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1976, ‘Toward an Explanatory Semantic Representation’,Linguistic Inquiry 7, 89–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A LatticeTheoretic Approach’, in,Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, R. Baeuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. van Stechow (eds.), de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, James: 1971, ‘Where do Noun Phrases Come from?’ in D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.)Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, and Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1974, ‘Opacity and Scope’, in M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds.)Semantics and Philosophy, NYU Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1975, ‘Montague Grammar and Transformational Grammar’,Linguistic Inquiry 6, 203–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara and Emmon Bach: 1981, ‘Quantification, Pronouns, and VP Anaphora’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.), Mathematical Centre Tracts, Amsterdam, pp. 445–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl: 1985,Toward an Anadic Situation Semantics, Stanford University unpublished paper.

  • Ross, John: 1967,Constraints on Variables in Syntax, unpublished MIT Ph.D. Dissertation.

  • Sag, Ivan: 1977,Deletion and Logical Form, unpublished MIT Ph.D. Dissertation.

  • Stowell, Tim: 1981, Origins of Phrase Structure, unpublished MIT Ph.D. Dissertation.

  • Stalnaker, Robert and Richmond Thomason: 1973, ‘A Semantic Theory of Adverbs’,Linguistic Inquiry 4, 195–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, Gregory: 1982,A GPSG Fragment for ‘Dependent Nominals’, Unpublished Ohio State University paper.

  • Williams, Edwin: 1975, ‘Small Clauses in English’, in John Kimball (ed.),Syntax and Semantics, Volume 4, Academic Press, New York, pp. 249–273.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlson, G.N. Same and different: Some consequences for syntax and semantics. Linguist Philos 10, 531–565 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628069

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628069

Keywords

Navigation