Abstract
Streamflow data have economic value because they are used for making decisions in water resources. By quantifying this value, hydrologists should find it much easier to overcome traditional obstacles to investment in streamflow data collection programmes. In this paper, an opportunity loss model is described which enables this to be done. The study has focused on evaluating typical benefits which may arise from more abundant data records for a specific purpose and, through this, provide further evidence which justifies investment in streamflow data collection activities. The specific purpose investigated is the development of reservoir capacity-reliability-yield relationship. Finally, it is argued that, while it is not uncommon for a streamgauging station to be project-specific, the data would invariably be used for other purposes and through these generate additional values. Considerations of such secondary values should make the whole idea of investment in streamflow data collection even more attractive economically.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (eds.): 1972,Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover, New York.
Acres Consulting Services Limited: 1977, Economic value of hydrometric data, Department of Fisheries and Environment, Inland Waters Directorate, Canada.
Adeloye, A. J.: 1989, Discussion on: Risk model for storm sewers with submerged outlets by A Osman Akan,J. Envir. Engrg. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 115(3), 683–684.
Adeloye, A. J.: 1990, Streamflow data and surface-water resource assessment—a quantitative demonstration of need for adequate investment in data collection in developing countries,J. Water Supply Res. Tec. (Aqua) 39(4), 225–236.
Ang, A. H-S. and Tang, W. H.: 1984,Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Wiley, New York.
Ball, D. B.: 1983, The economic design of streamgauging networks, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
Bayazit, M. and Bulu, A.: 1991, Generalised probability distribution of reservoir capacity,J. Hydrol. 126, 195–205.
Burges, S. J. and Linsley, R. K.: 1971, Some factors influencing reservoir storage,J. Hydraul. Div. Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 97, 977–991.
Carty, J. G. and Cunnane, C.: 1990, An evaluation of some methods of determining storage yield relationships for impounding reservoirs.J. IWEM 4(1), 35–43.
Clarke, K. F.: 1994, Sustainability and the water and environmental manager,J. IWEM 8(1), 1–9.
Cordery, I. and Cloke, P. S.: 1994, Benefits of flow data for flood-protection design,J. IWEM 8(1), 33–38.
Davis, D., Kissiel, C. and Duckstein, L.: 1972, Bayesian decision theory applied to design in hydrology,Water Resour. Res. 8(1), 33–41.
Dawdy, D. R., Kubic, H. E. and Close, E. R.: 1970, Value of streamflow data for project design—a pilot study,Water Resour. Res. 6(4), 1045–1050.
Fiering, M. B. and Jackson, B. B.: 1971,Synthetic Streamflows, Water Resources Monograph 1, AGU, Washington, D.C.
Grima, A. P.: 1972, Residential water demand—alternative choices for management, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Howe, C. W. and Linaweaver, F. P.: 1967, The impact of price on residential water demand and its relation to system design and price structure,Water Resour. Res. 3(1).
Hufschmidt, M. M. and Fiering, M. B.: 1967,Simulation Techniques for Design of Water Resources Systems, Macmillan, London.
Langbein, W. B.: 1954,Stream Gauging Networks, IAHS publ. No. 38, pp. 293–303.
Loucks, D. P., Stedinger, J. R. and Haith, D. A.: 1981,Water Resource Systems Planning and Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Lucas, M.: 1970,Statistical Methods, Butterworth, London.
Matalas, N. C.: 1967, Mathematical assessment of synthetic hydrology,Water Resour. Res. 3(4), 937–945.
McMahon, T. A. and Mein, R. G.: 1986,River and Reservoir Yield, Water Resources Publication, Littleton, Colorado.
Moss, M. E.: 1970, Optimum operating procedure for a river gauging station established to provide data for design of water supply project,Water Resour. Res. 6(4), 1051–1061.
Moss, M. E. and Dawdy, D. R.: 1980, Supply and demand and the design of surface water supplies,Hydro. Sci. Bull. 25(3).
Rosbjerg, D. and Gottlieb, L.: 1982, Uncertainty in reservoir design benefits using secondary data, inOptimal Allocation of Water Resources, Proc. of Exeter Symposium, IAHS Publ. No. 135.
Tschannerl, G.: 1971, Designing reservoirs with short streamflow records,Water Resour. Res. 7(4), 827–833.
Tung, Y-K.: 1992, Probability distribution for benefit/cost ratio and net benefits,J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 118(2), 133–150.
Young, G. K.(Jr.): 1967, Finding reservoir operating rules,J. Hydraul. Div., Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 93(HY6), 297–321.
Vogel, R. M. and Stedinger, J. R.: 1987, Generalised storage-reliability-yield relationships,J. Hydrol. 89, 303–327.
Water Research Centre (WRc): 1977, Cost information for water supply and sewage disposal, Technical Report TR61, Medmenham, U.K.
Water Services Yearbook: 1985, Industrial and Marine Publications, Surrey, U.K.
Wilson, K. C.: 1972, Benefit-accuracy relationship for small structure design floods,Water Resour. Res. 8(2), 508–512.
World Meteorological Organisation: 1990, Cost-benefit assessment techniques and user requirements for hydrological data, WMO Report No. 23, WMO, Geneva.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adeloye, A.J. An opportunity loss model for estimating the value of streamflow data for reservoir planning. Water Resour Manage 10, 45–79 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00698811
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00698811