Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is demonstrated that neither the arguments leading to inconsistencies in the description of quantum-mechanical measurement nor those “explaining” the process of measurement by means of thermodynamical statistics are valid. Instead, it is argued that the probability interpretation is compatible with an objective interpretation of the wave function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. P. Wigner,Am. J. Phys. 31, 6 (1963); B. d'Espagnat,Nuovo Cimento (Suppl.)4, 828 (1966); T. Earman and A. Shimony,Nuovo Cimento 54B, 332 (1968); J. M. Jauch, E. P. Wigner, and M. M. Yanase,Nuovo Cimento 48B, 144 (1967); G. Ludwig, inWerner Heisenberg und die Physik unserer Zeit (Braunschweig, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Ludwig,Die Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Berlin, 1954), p. 122 ff.;Z. Physik 135, 483 (1953); A. Danieri, A. Loinger, and G. M. Prosperi,Nucl. Phys. 33, 297 (1962);Nuovo Cimento 44B, 119 (1966); L. Rosenfeld,Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Suppl.) p. 222 (1965); W. Weidlich,Z. Physik 205, 199 (1967).

  3. J. S. Bell,Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966); D. Bohm and J. Bub,Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 453 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. von Neumann,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer, Berlin, 1932) [English translation: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1955)].

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. J. Glauber,Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963); P. Caruthers and M. M. Nieto,Am. J. Phys. 33, 537 (1965); B. Jancovici and D. Schiff,Nucl. Phys. 58, 678 (1964); C. L. Mehta and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Rev. 138, B274 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Schrödinger,Z. Physik 14, 664 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Bohm,Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. M. Jauch,Helv. Phys. Acta 33, 711 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Everett,Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957); J. A. Wheeler,Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 463 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. P. Wigner, inThe Scientist Speculates, L. J. Good, ed. (Heinemann, London, 1962), p. 284.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. M. Elsasser,The Physical Foundation of Biology (Pergamon Press, New York and London, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Einstein, N. Rosen, and B. Podolski,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935); D. Bohm and Y. Aharonov,Phys. Rev. 108, 1070 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. C. Wick, A. S. Wightman, and E. P. Wigner,Phys. Rev. 88, 101 (1952); E. P. Wigner and M. M. Yanase,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (US) 49, 910 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Heisenberg,Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 269 (1957); Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio,Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. D. Zeh,Z. Physik 202, 38 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    H. D. Zeh

Authors
  1. H. D. Zeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeh, H.D. On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory. Found Phys 1, 69–76 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708656

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708656

Keywords

Search

Navigation