Skip to main content
Log in

Management and diversity of arthropods inCalluna heathland

  • Papers
  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heathlands, dominated byCalluna vulgaris, are located along the western seaboard of Europe. Most undergo a cyclical succession as the heather plants pass through four definable growth-phases over a period of about 30 years. Examples of upland heathlands are drawn from the North York Moors National Park, an area of Jurassic rocks in the north of England (approximately 54°25′N, 0°55′W). Botanical diversity is low. In a survey of 10 heathlands selected to encompass the botanical variation of the heathlands of the National Park, only 40 species of higher plants and 31 species of mosses were recorded (2.2% and 4.5% of the British flora, respectively).

However, diversity of some invertebrate groups is high. Totals of 54 species of carabid beetles and 127 species of spiders were recorded (15.3% and 20.4% of the British fauna, respectively). At least two environmental gradients appear to influence the species composition of the invertebrate assemblages: a wet-dry gradient and the height of the vegetation (corresponding to the growth-phase of the heather). Experimental areas on three heathlands were burnt and cut, the traditional and more modern methods of heather management. Analysis of both the spider and beetle data indicated that the species assemblages were primarily influenced by the growth-phase of the heather. Some of the nationally rarer species are associated with the open conditions of recently-cut or burnt heathland. An altitudinal effect was also inferred since heathland at 410 m above sea level tended to be less species-rich than heathlands at ca 260 m above sea level.

These results present a paradox. Although botanical diversity is extremely low, and although it is a non-natural ecosystem maintained by fire and grazing management to prevent a succession to woodland, arthropod diversity can be extremely high. The discussion focuses on the importance of upland heathlands in the conservation of insect and spider diversity, as well as on the value of these upland areas for conservation more generally.C. vulgaris is seen to be a key species on which many other species depend. One conclusion is that there is insufficient effort, nationally and especially internationally, to conserve the heathlands of Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1989)Statement of the Workshop on Key Species for Conservation and Economic Development. Duplicated by IUCN (The World Conservation Union) and The Commonwealth Science Council.

  • Commission of the European Communities (1990) Supplementary Annexes to the Proposal for a Council Directive on the Protection of Natural and Semi-natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. COM (90) 59 final, Brussels.

  • Disney, R.H.L. (1986) Assessments using invertebrates: posing the problem. InWildlife Conservation Evaluation (M.B. Usher, ed.), pp. 271–93. London & New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishpool, M. and Usher, M.B. (1989) Association between carabid beetle distribution and vegetation on the North York Moors.The Naturalist 114, 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S.M. (1991) Ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) communities on upland heath and their association with heathland flora.J. Biogeog. 18, 281–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S.M. and Usher, M.B. (1989) Insect abundance on burned and cut uplandCalluna heath.The Entomologist 108, 147–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimingham, C.H. (1972)Ecology of Heathlands. London, Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimingham, C.H. (1975)An Introduction to Heathland Ecology. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauge, E. (1976) Spiders (Araneae) of a West NorwegianCalluna heath.Zoological Museum, University of Bergen, Report No. 20.

  • Hill, M.O. (1979)TWINSPAN: a Fortran Program for Arranging Multi-variate Data in an Ordered Two-way Table by Classification of the Individuals and Attributes. Ithaca: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, P. (1986)Red Grouse: the Biology and Management of a Wild Gamebird. Fordingbridge: Game Conservancy Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merret, P. (1976) Changes in the ground-living spider fauna after heathland fires in Dorset.Bull. Brit. Archaeol. Soc. 3, 214–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, J. (1988) Vegetation and soil change in the uplands. InEcological Change in the Uplands (M.B. Usher and D.B.A. Thompson, eds), pp. 57–70. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, N.W. (1987)The Bird of Time: the Science and Politics of Nature Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North York Moors National Park (Undated)Moorland Management. Helmsley: North York Moors National Park Department.

  • Ratcliffe, D.A. (1977)A Nature Conservation Review. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, D.A. (1986) Selection of important areas for wildlife conservation in Great Britain: the Nature Conservancy Council's approach. InWildlife Conservation Evaluation (by M.B. Usher, ed.), pp. 135–59. London & New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, D.A. and Thompson, D.B.A. (1988) The British uplands: their ecological character and international significance. InEcological Change in the Uplands (M.B. Usher and D.B.A. Thompson, eds), pp. 9–36. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.J.E. (1978)The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, M.B. (1986a) Insect conservation: the relevance of population and community ecology and of biogeography. InProceedings of the 3rd European Congress of Entomology (H.H.W. Velthuis, ed.), pp. 387–98. Amsterdam, Nederlands: Entomologische Vereniging.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, M.B. (1986b) Wildlife conservation evaluation: attributes, criteria and values. InWildlife Conservation Evaluation (M.B. Usher, ed.), pp. 3–44. London & New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, M.B. (1990) Assessment of conservation values: the use of water traps to assess the arthropod communities of heather moorlands.Biol. Conserv. 53, 191–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, M.B. and Smart, L.M. (1988) Recolonization of burnt and cut heathland in the North York Moors by arachnids.The Naturalist 113, 103–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. (1989) Diversity and stability. InEcological Concepts: the Contribution of Ecology to an Understanding of the Natural World (J.M. Cherrett, ed.), pp. 115–45. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Usher, M.B. Management and diversity of arthropods inCalluna heathland. Biodivers Conserv 1, 63–79 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00731035

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00731035

Keywords

Navigation