Abstract
The Principle of Semantic Compositionality (sometimes called ‘Frege's Principle’) is the principle that the meaning of a (syntactically complex) whole is a function only of the meanings of its (syntactic) parts together with the manner in which these parts were combined. This principle has been extremely influential throughout the history of formal semantics; it has had a tremendous impact upon modern linguistics ever since Montague Grammars became known; and it has more recently shown up as a guiding principle for a certain direction in cognitive science.
Despite the fact that The Principle is vague or underspecified at a number of points — such as what meaning is, what counts as a part, what counts as a syntactic complex, what counts as combination — this has not stopped some people from viewing The Principle as obviously true, true almost by definition. And it has not stopped other people from viewing The Principle as false, almost pernicious in its effect. And some of these latter theorists think that it is an empirically false principle while others think of it as a methodologically wrong-headed way to proceed.
In fact, there are approximately 318 arguments against The Principle which can be found in the literature, whereas there are only three (or maybe four) arguments proposed in favor of The Principle. This paper will adjudicate among these arguments. And at the end it will suggest some other way to look at what proponents of compositionality really want.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan, K.: 1986,Linguistic Meaning, Vol. 1, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Avramides, A.: 1989,Meaning and Mind, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cooper, R.: 1983,Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Cresswell, M.: 1973,Logics and Languages, London: Methuen.
Dummett, M.: 1981,Frege: Philosophy of Language, 2nd ed.: Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Field, H.: 1978, ‘Mental Representation’,Erkenntnis 13, 9–61.
Frege, G.: 1884, Die Grundlagen der Arithmertik translated asFoundations of Arthmetic by J. L. Austin, NY: Bantam Books.
Grandy, R.: 1990, ‘Understanding and Compositionality’,Philosophical Perspectives 4, 557–572.
Grice, P.: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation’ in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.),The Logic of Grammar, Encino: Dickenson Publishers.
Haugeland, J.: 1987,Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Higginbotham, J.: 1987, ‘On Semantics’ in LePore (Ed.),New Directions in Semantics, London: Academic Press, pp. 1–54.
Hirst, G.: 1987,Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity, Cambridge: CUP.
Jackendoff, R.: 1987,Consciousness and the Computational Mind, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Janssen, T.: 1983,Foundation and Applications of Montague Grammar, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Kamp, H.: 1990, ‘Response to Groenendijk and Stockhof’, unpublished manuscript, University of Stuttgart.
Kaplan, D.: 1968, ‘What is Russell's Theory of Descriptions?’ reprinted in D. Pears ed.:The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Oxford: Oxford UP.
Lakoff, G.: 1987,Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R.: 1987,Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1, Stanford: Stanford UP.
Lewis, D.: 1972, ‘General Semantics’ in D. Davidson and G. Harman (Eds.),Semantics of Natural Language, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Montague, R.: 1970, ‘Universal Grammar’, in Thomason (1974), pp. 222–246.
Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in English’, in Thomason (1974), pp. 247–270.
Pelletier, F. J.: 1994, ‘On an Argument against Semantic Compositionality’, in D. Prawitz and D. Westerstahl (Eds.),Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Schubert, L. K. and Pelletier, F. J.: 1982, ‘From English to Logic: Context-free Computation of “Conventional” Logic Translation’,Journal of Computational Linguistics 8, 27–44.
Smith, B.: 1987, ‘Philosophy 266: Representations, Formality, and the Foundations of Computation’, unpublished manuscript, Stanford Univ.
Thomason, R.: 1974,Formal Philosophy, New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
Zadrozny, W.: 1992, ‘On Compositional Semantics’,Proceedings of COLING-92, pp. 260–266.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pelletier, F.J. The Principle of Semantic Compositionality. Topoi 13, 11–24 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763644
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763644