Skip to main content
Log in

Oxidative coupling of methane: An inherent limit to selectivity?

  • Published:
Catalysis Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mechanistic considerations show that pressure must be taken into account in evaluating oxidative coupling catalyst performance, and predict an upper limit of around 30% yield of higher hydrocarbons at one atmosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Mimoun, Nouv. J. Chim. 11 (1987) 513.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.A. Roos, A.G. Bakker, H. Bosch, J.G. van Ommen and J.R.H. Ross, Catal. Today 1 (1987) 133.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.A. Labinger and K.C. Ott, J. Phys. Chem. 91 (1987) 2682.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Otsuka, Q. Liu, M. Hatano and A. Morikawa, Chem. Lett. (1986) 903. It should also be noted that these and related results utilize chloride-containing catalysts, and there is evidence that gas-phase Cl species are responsible for some of the better performances; hence they degrade with use.

  5. K. Aika, T. Moriyama, N. Takasaki and E. Iwamatsu, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. (1986) 1210.

  6. I. Matsuura, T. Doi and Y. Utsumi, Chem. Lett. (1987) 1473.

  7. C.A. Jones, J.J. Leonard and J.A. Sofranko, J. Catal. 103 (1987) 311

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.A. Jones, J.J. Leonard and J.A. Sofranko, Energy & Fuels 1 (1987) 12.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.L. Grimmett, L. Breeden, C.E. McBride, A. Goldman and J.A. Labinger, unpublished results cited in Labinger et al., in:Catalysis 1987: Proceedings of the 10th North American Meeting of the Catalysis Society, ed. J.W. Ward (Elsevier, New York, 1988) p. 513.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Ito, J.-X. Wang, C.-H. Lin and J.H. Lunsford, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107 (1985) 5062;

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.-H. Lin, K.D. Campbell, J.-X. Wang and J.H. Lunsford, J. Phys. Chem. 90 (1986) 534

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.D. Campbell, E. Morales and J.H. Lunsford, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109 (1987) 7900.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lunsford has noted that the C-H bond in ethylene isstronger than that in methane, and suggested that a catalyst might be found for which the former is less reactive and hence the constraints discussed here need not apply J.H. Lunsford, in:Methane Conversion, eds. D.M. Bibby, C.D. Chang, R.F. Howe and S. Yurchak (Elsevier, New York, 1988) 359.). However, since ethylene is more reactive even for gas-phase reactions with OH and related species, in spite of its stronger bond, it does not seem very likely that this could be achieved.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.W. Sutherland, J.V. Michael and R.B. Klemm, J. Phys. Chem. 90 (1986) 5941. It may be noted in fig. 2 that this assumption produces curves that extrapolate to 100% selectivity at 0 conversion; i.e., there is no direct CO2 formation, and a still lower value fork 5 would not give any improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.L. Jezl, G.O. Michaels and M.J. Spangler, U.S. Patent 4,754,091 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.M. Gaffney, C.A. Jones, J.J. Leonard, J.A. Sofranko and H.P. Withers, in:Catalysis 1987: Proceedings of the 10th North American Meeting of the Catalysis Society, ed. J.W. Ward (Elsevier, New York, 1988) 523.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Labinger, J.A. Oxidative coupling of methane: An inherent limit to selectivity?. Catal Lett 1, 371–375 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00766166

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00766166

Keywords

Navigation