Abstract
Issues of privacy and employee health screening rank as two of the most important ethical concerns organizations will face in the next five years. Despite the increasing numbers of social scientists researching personal privacy and the current focus on workplace privacy rights as one of the most dynamic areas of employment law, the concept of privacy remains relatively abstract. Understanding how the courts define privacy and use the expectation of privacy standards is paramount given the strategic importance of the law as a legal socializing agent. This article reports on two federal court decisions involving employer drug and HIV testing whose determinations relied on assumptions about the psychological dimensions of privacy. How the courts define privacy, the outcome of this definition and the ethical ramifications as it affects the employee/employer relationship are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, I.: 1975,The Environment and Social Behavior (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).
Altman, I.: 1976, ‘Privacy: A Conceptual Analysis’,Environment and Behavior 8, 7–29.
Bloustein, E.: 1964, ‘Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser’,New York University Law Review 39, 962–1007.
Boyle, D.: 1989, ‘Proposal to Amend the United States Privacy Act to Extend Its Protections to Foreign Nationals and Non-Resident Aliens’,Cornell International Law Journal, Spring, 285–305.
Breckenridge, A.: 1970,The Right to Privacy (University of Arkansas Press, Lincoln, NB).
Bureau of National Affairs: 1987,Workplace Privacy: Employee Testing, Surveillance, Wrongful Discharge, and Other Areas of Vulnerability (BNA Reports, Washington, D.C.).
Burgoon, J.: 1982, ‘Privacy and Communication’,Communication Yearbook 6, 206–248.
Carroll, J.: 1975,Confidential Information Sources: Public and Private (Security World, Los Angeles, CA).
Chaiken, A. and V. Derlega: 1974, ‘Variables Affecting the Appropriateness of Self-Disclosure’,Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42, 588–593.
Conklin, K.: 1976, ‘Privacy: Should There be a Right to It?’,Educational Theory 26, 263–270.
Consumer Reports: 1990, ‘The Telltale Gene’,Consumer Reports July, 438–488.
Culbert, S. A.: 1967,Interpersonal Processes of Self-Disclosure: It Takes Two to See One (NTL Institute, Washington, D.C.).
Derlega, V. and J. Grzelak: 1979, ‘Appropriateness of Self-Disclosure’, in G. Chelune (ed.),Self-Disclosure: Origins, Patterns and Implications of Openness in Interpersonal Relationships (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA), pp. 151–177.
Falco, M. and W. Cikins: 1989,Toward a National Policy on AIDS and Drug Testing (The Brookings Institute: Boston).
Frosini, V.: 1987, ‘The European Convention on Data Protection’,Computer Law & Practice, Jan–Feb, 84–90.
Glover V ENCOR, 686 F. Supp. 243 (D. Neb. 1988) 251.
Greenfield, P.: 1989, ‘Drug Testing and the Law’,Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 2, 11–26.
Gunderson, M., D. Mayo and F. Rhame: 1989,AIDS: Testing and Privacy (University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, Utah).
Keeley, M.: 1988,A Social Contract Theory of Organizations (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN).
Laufer, R. and M. Wolfe: 1977, ‘Privacy as a Concept and a Social Issue: A Multidimensional Development Theory’,Journal of Social Issues 33, 22–42.
Levin, H. and F. Askin: 1977, ‘Privacy in the Courts: Law and Social Reality’,Journal of Social Issues 33, 138–153.
Miller, G. and M. Steinberg: 1975,Between People (Science Research Associates, Palo Alto, CA).
Nilsen, T.: 1974,Ethics of Speech Communication (Bobbs-Merrill Company, New York).
Proshansky, H., W. Ittleson and L. Rivlin: 1970,Environmental Psychology: Man and His Physical Environment (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York).
Rappoport, A.: 1975, ‘Toward a Redefinition of Density’,Environment and Behavior 7, 133–158.
Rosen, P.: 1972,The Supreme Court and Social Science (University of Illinois Press, Urban, IL).
Rothstein, M.: 1989,Medical Screening and the Employee Health Cost Crisis (BNA, Washington, D.C.).
Schein, V.: 1977, ‘Individual Privacy and Personnel Psychology: The Need for a Broader Perspective’,Journal of Social Issues 33, 154–168.
Seeger, M. and M. Simms: 1990, ‘Issues of Testing, Privacy and Self-Disclosure: Managing Individual and Organizational Concerns’,Proceedings of the First Communication Ethics Conference, 148–164.
Shils, E.: 1966, ‘Privacy: Its Constitution and Vicissitudes’,Law and Contemporary Problems 73, 741–752.
Simms, M.: 1991, ‘A Critical Analysis of Workplace Medical Screening Practices, Privacy and Self-Disclosure: Assessing Individual and Organizational Concerns in the 1990s’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
Skinner v Railway Labor Executives' Association, 489 U.S.—, 103 L Ed 2d 639 (1988) 648.
Tapp, J.: 1971, ‘Reflections’,Journal of Social Issues 33, 1–16.
Warren, C. and B. Laslett: 1977, ‘Privacy and Secrecy: A Conceptual Comparison’,Journal of Social Issues 33, 43–51.
Walker, R.: 1982, ‘Privacy and Human Rights: A Comparison of U.S. and European Experience’,Private Investors Abroad, 17–45.
Werhane, P.: 1985,Persons, Rights and Corporations (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
Westin, A.: 1968,Privacy and Freedom (Antheneum: New York).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Michele Simms, as an adjunct professor of business communication and organizational behavior, has taught at the University of Michigan, Wayne State University and Oakland University schools of business in Michigan. In addition to teaching, she consults in the areas of worksite wellness, alternative dispute resolution, transition management and change.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simms, M. Defining privacy in employee health screening cases: Ethical ramifications concerning the employee/employer relationship. J Bus Ethics 13, 315–325 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871760
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871760