Skip to main content
Log in

Organizational influence in a model of the moral decision process of accountants

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on a survey that investigated the moral decision processes of accountants. A formal belief revision model is adapted and hypotheses based on theorizations from the cognitive-developmental school are tested. The moral decision processes of accountants are hypothesized to be influenced by professional expectations, organizational expectations and internalized expectations. Subjects provided specific demographic data and were asked to access the appropriateness of fourteen principles for making moral decisions in business. Subjects were also asked to indicate which of the fourteen approaches would be most appropriate for resolving each of five ethical situations that are representative of common ethical dilemmas in accounting.

Subjects' responses to the appropriateness of the fourteen principles are reduced to two dimensions using factor analysis. The factors are consistent and representative of important underlying dimensions of the stages of moral development. Demographic variables are correlated with the extracted factors using analysis of variance.

The results show that subjects consider interpersonal expectations and conformity to be more appropriate than approaches that are self-serving. These findings suggest that ethical decision processes of accountants are influenced by organizational support. Age, gender, and education were also found to influence the moral decision process. Overall, the findings are consistent with the expectations hypothesized from the cognitive-developmental school and suggest that the moral development of accountants is ongoing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, G. D.: 1985, ‘A Fresh Look at Standards of Professional Conduct’,Journal of Accountancy (Sept.), 91–106.

  • Arlow, P. and T. A. Ulrich: 1988, ‘A Longitudinal Survey of Business School Graduates' Assessments of Business Ethics’,Journal of Business Ethics 7, 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlow, P.: 1991, ‘Personal Characteristics in College Students' Evaluations of Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility’,Journal of Business Ethics 10, 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. B.: 1987, ‘Moral Development and Accounting Education’,Journal of Accounting Education 5, 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumhart, R. C.: 1968,An Honest Profit: What Businessmen Say About Ethics in Business (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. J. and H. C. Stanley: 1966,Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clart, J. W.: 1966,Religious and Moral Standards of American Businessmen (Southwestern Publishing Company, Cincinnati).

    Google Scholar 

  • Claypool, G. A., D. F. Fetyko and M. A. Pearson, 1990, ‘Reactions to Ethical Dilemmas: A Study Pertaining to Certified Public Accountants’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, 699–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., J. Ward, J. Taylor and B. Bardige: 1988,Mapping the Moral Domain (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1977, ‘In a Different Choice: Women's Conceptions of the Self and of Morality’,Harvard Educational Review 47, 481–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, ‘Adult Development and Women's Development: Arrangements for a Marriage’, in J. Giele (eds.),Women in the Middle Years (John Wiley & Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltebeitel, K. M. and S. K. Jones: 1991, ‘Initial Evidence on the Impact of Integrating Ethics into Accounting Education’,Issues in Accounting Education 6(2), 262–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilebeitel, K. M. and S. K. Jones: 1992, ‘An Assessment of Ethics Instruction in Accounting Education’,Journal of Business Ethics 11, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Management Accountants: 1982,Statement of Management Accounting No. 1-B, June 17.

  • Institute of Management Accountants: 1983,Statement of Management Accounting No. 1-C, June 1.

  • Johnson, R. A. and D. W. Wichern: 1982,Applied Multivariate Statistical Methods (Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. and L. Ponemon: 1993, ‘A Comment on A Multidemensional Analysis of Selected Ethical Issues in Accounting’,The Accounting Review 68(2), in press.

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1971,The Philosophy of Moral Development (Harper & Row Publishers, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. V.: 1989, ‘Ethical Principles for Decision Makers: A Longitudinal Study’,Journal of Business Ethics 8, 271–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S. E.: 1970, ‘A Behavioral Study of CPA Ethics’, Ph.D. Dissertation (University of Wisconsin).

  • Loeb, S. E.: 1984, ‘Codes of ethics and Self-regulation for Non-public Accountants: A Public Policy Perspective’,Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Spring, 1–8.

  • Petrick, J. A., R. A. Wagley and T. J. Von der Embse: 1991, ‘Structured Ethical Decision Making: Improving the Prospects of Managerial Success in Business’,Sam Advanced Management Journal 56, 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L.: 1990, ‘Ethical Judgments in Accounting: A Cognitive-Developmental Perspective’,Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1, 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. and Glazer, A.: 1990, ‘Accounting Education and Ethical Development: The influence of liberal Learning on Students and Alumni in Accounting Practice’,Issues in Accounting Education 5(2), 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1979a,Development in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1979b,Revised Manual for the Defining Issues Test (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, E. R. and D. P. Robin: 1991, ‘A Conceptual Model of Corporate Moral Development’,Journal of Business Ethics 10, 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sas Institute Inc.: 1989,SAS/STAT Users Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlachter, P. J.: 1990, ‘Organizational Influences on Individual Ethical Behavior in Public Accounting’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, 839–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, J. E.: 1967, ‘Professional and Bureaucratic Organization in the Public Accounting Firm’,Accounting Review (July), 553–565.

  • St. Pierre, K. E., E. S. Nelson and A. L. Gabbin: 1990, ‘A Study of the Ethical Development of Accounting Majors in Relation to Other Business and Nonbusiness Disciplines’,The Accounting Educators' Journal (Summer), 23–35.

  • Wood, A. M.: 1985, ‘What Must be Done: A Report from the POB’,Journal of Accountancy (Aug.), 142–148.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, S.K., Hiltebeitel, K.M. Organizational influence in a model of the moral decision process of accountants. J Bus Ethics 14, 417–431 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872084

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872084

Keywords

Navigation