Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Advertising ethics: A contextual response based on classical ethical theory

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

F. P. Bishop argues that the ethical standard for advertising practitioners must be utilitarian. Indeed, the utilitarian theory of ethics in decision-making has traditionally been the preference of U.S. advertising practitioners. This article, therefore, argues that the U.S. advertising industry's de-emphasis of deontological ethics is a reason for its continuing struggle with unfavorable public perceptions of its ethics — and credibility. The perceptions of four scenarios on advertising ethics and the analyses of the openended responses of 174 members of the American Advertising Federation to those scenarios suggest that advertising practitioners need a stricter adherence to deontological ethics than is indicated in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaah, I.: 1990, ‘The Influence of Non-Anonymity Deriving from Feedback of Research Results on Marketing Professionals' Research Ethics Judgements’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, 949–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Advertising Federation: 1984, ‘The Advertising Principles of American Business’, March 2, San Antonio, Texas.

  • American Association of Advertising Agencies: 1990, ‘Standards of Practice of the American Association of Advertising Agencies’, September 18. Author.

  • Beets, S. D.: 1991, ‘Personal Morals and Professional Ethics: A Review and an Empirical Examination of Public Accounting’,Business & Professional Ethics Journal 10, 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellizzi, J. A. and R. E. Hite: 1989, ‘Supervising Unethical Salesforce Behavior’,Journal of Marketing 53, 36–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergerson, S.: 1991–1992, ‘Advertising's Incredible Credibility Crisis’,American Advertising 7, 20 and 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, F. P.: 1949,The Ethics of Advertising (Robert Hale, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, W. and T. Bernal: 1992, ‘Validating the Code of Ethics’,IABC Communication World, 40–43.

  • Carson, T. L., R. E. Wokutch and J. E. Cox: 1985, ‘An Ethical Analysis of Deception in Advertising’,Journal of Business Ethics 4, 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chonko, L. B., S. D. Hunt and R. D. Howell: 1987, ‘Ethics and the American Advertising Federation Principles’,International Journal of Advertising 6, 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christians, C. G., K. B. Rotzoll and M. Fackler: 1991,Media Ethics: Cases and Moral Reasoning, 3rd ed. Longman, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. J.: 1992, ‘The Ethics of Advertising: Do Investors Care?’International Journal of Advertising 11, 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, R.: 1987, ‘Persuasive Advertising, Autonomy, and the Creation of Desire’,Journal of Business Ethics 6, 413–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeConinck, J. B. and D. J. Good: 1989, ‘Perceptual Differences of Sales Practitioners and Students Concerning Ethical Behavior’,Journal of Business Ethics 8, 667–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., M. A. Jolson, M. Kotabe and C. U. Lim: 1991, ‘A Cross-National Investigation of Industrial Salespeople's Ethical Perceptions’,Journal of International Business Studies 22, 651–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund, R. B. and D. S. Saurman: 1988,Advertising and the Market Process: A Modern Economic View (Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, H. D. and R. C. Thompson: 1990, ‘Teaching Business Ethics: A Challenge for Business Educators in the 1990s’,Journal of Marketing Education, 10–22.

  • Ferrell, O. C. and K. M. Weaver: 1978, ‘Ethical Beliefs of Marketing Managers’,Journal of Marketing 42, 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrich, J. P. and O. C. Ferrell: 1992, ‘The Impact of Perceived Risk and Moral Philosophy on Ethical Decision Making in Business Organization’,Journal of Business Research 24, 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J.: 1991, ‘A Model of Decision-Making Incorporating Ethical Values’,Journal of Business Ethics 10, 841–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J.: 1988, ‘An Examination of Marketing Ethics: Role of the Decision Maker, Consequence of the Decision, Management Position, and Sex of the Respondent’,Journal of Macromarketing 8, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J. and H. Becker: 1984, ‘Linking Management Behavior to Ethical Philosophy — An Empirical Investigation’,Academy of Management Journal 27, 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J. and H. Becker: 1983, ‘Ethical Behavior of Marketing Managers’,Journal of Business Ethics 2, 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greyser, S. A. and B. B. Reece: 1971, ‘Problems in Review: Businessmen Look Hard at Advertising’,Harvard Business Review 49, 18–20, 22, 24, 26, 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greyser, S. A.: 1962, ‘Businessmen re Advertising: ‘Yes, but ...’,Harvard Business Review 40, 20–46, 182–188, 193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, M. J.: 1991, ‘Ethical Problems of Advertising to Children’,Journal of Mass Media Ethics 6, 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, K. O.: 1987, ‘What Good are Ethics Courses?’Across the Board, 10–11.

  • Harris, J. R. and H. J. Guffey, Jr.: 1991, ‘A Measure of the Short-Term Effects of Ethical Instruction’,Journal of Marketing Education, 64–68.

  • Hegarty, H. W. and H. P. Sims, Jr.: 1979, ‘Organizational Philosophy, Policies and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment’,Journal of Applied Psychology 64, 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hite, R. E. and J. A. Bellizzi: 1987, ‘Salespeople's Use of Entertainment and Gifts’,Industrial Marketing Management 16, 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and L. B. Chonko: 1987, ‘Ethical Problems of Advertising Agency Executives’,Journal of Advertising 16, 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., L. B. Chonko and J. B. Wilcox: 1984, ‘Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers’,Journal of Marketing Research 21, 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., V. R. Wood and L. B. Chonko: 1989, ‘Corporate Ethical Values and Organizational Commitment in Marketing’,Journal of Marketing 53, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, ‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’,The Academy of Management Review 16, 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, D. M. and O. C. Ferrell: 1981, ‘The Organizational Ethics of Advertising: Corporate and Agency Views’,Journal of Advertising 10, 21–30, 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambeth, E. B.: 1986,Committed Journalism: An Ethic for the Profession (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Ind.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M.: 1989, ‘Ethics Courses: Useless’,The New York Times, 23.

  • Littlechild, S. C.: 1982, ‘Controls on Advertising: An Examination of Some Economic Arguments’,International Journal of Advertising 1, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. B., W. O. Bearden and L. D. Richardson: 1990, ‘Perceived Conduct and Professional Ethics Among Marketing Faculty’,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18, 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsteller: 1972,The Wonderful World of Words: Memoranda and Speeches of Bill Marsteller 1951–1972 (Marsteller, Inc., Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, R. E., W. L. Cron, A. J. Dubinsky and E. A. Joachimsthaler: 1988, ‘Influence of Formalization on the Organizational Commitment and Work Alienation of Salespeople and Industrial Buyers’,Journal of Marketing Research 25, 376–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, C. S.: 1989, ‘Scenarios Jog Students' Ethical Sensitivities’,Marketing Educator, 4.

  • Myers, J. G., W. F. Massy and S. A. Greyser: 1980,Marketing Research and Knowledge Development: An Assessment for Marketing Management (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevett, T.: 1985, ‘The Ethics of Advertising: F. P. Bishop Reconsidered’,International Journal of Advertising 4, 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • The New York Times: 1942, ‘Advertisers Draft Code for Wartime’, March 18, 40.

  • Ossip, A.: 1985, ‘Ethics — Everyday Choices in Marketing Research’,Journal of Advertising Research 25, RC10-RC12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, C. B.: 1991, ‘PRSA Members' Perceptions of Public Relations Ethics’,Public Relations Review 17, 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, C. B. and G. W. McLaughlin: 1989, ‘Perceptual Ranks of College Students' Ethical Beliefs and Behaviors’,Perceptual and Motor Skills 69, 1027–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M. and M. Fernandes: 1991, ‘The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research’,Journal of Business Ethics 10, 805–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M. and A. M. Gibson: 1990, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971,A Theory of Justice (The Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M.: 1990, ‘Advertising Self-Regulation in the 1980s: A Review’, in J. H. Leigh and C. R. Martin, Jr. (eds.),Current Issues & Research in Advertising, Vol.13, pp. 369–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotzoll, K. B. and C. G. Christians: 1980, ‘Advertising Agency Practitioners' Perceptions of Ethical Decisions’,Journalism Quarterly 57, 425–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, D. L.: 1979,Justice or Tyranny? A Critique of John Rawls's ‘Theory of Justice’ (Kennikat Press, Port Washington, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H.: 1953, ‘A Method for Judging All Contrasts in the Analysis of Variance’,Biometrika 40, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A. W.: 1992, ‘The Ultimate Ethics Test’,Across the Board, 18–22.

  • Wood, J. A., J. G. Longenecker, J. A. McKinney and C. W. Moore: 1988, ‘Ethical Attitudes of Students and Business Professionals: A Study of Moral Reasoning’,Journal of Business Ethics 7, 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Advertising, Michigan State University, 48824-1212, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Cornelius B. Pratt & E. Lincoln James

Authors
  1. Cornelius B. Pratt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Lincoln James
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Cornelius B. Pratt is Associate Professor in the Department of Advertising at Michigan State University. His research has been published in such journals as theJournal of Media Planning, Journal of Business Ethics, Public Relations Review, Public Relations Journal, Public Relations Quarterly, andJournalism Quarterly.

E. Lincoln James is Associate Professor and Assistant Chairperson in the Department of Advertising at Michigan State University. His work has appeared in several scholarly journals, including theInternational Journal of Advertising, Journal of Advertising, Journal of Direct Marketing, Journal of Media Planning, andWeberforschung und Praxis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pratt, C.B., James, E.L. Advertising ethics: A contextual response based on classical ethical theory. J Bus Ethics 13, 455–468 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881455

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881455

Keywords

Search

Navigation