Abstract
This paper provides the first documentation of the power and specification of the generalized sign test, which is based on the percentage of positive abnormal returns in an estimation period. In simulations using daily stock return data, the generalized sign test is well specified with both exchange listed and NASDAQ stocks. A rank test is more powerful under ideal conditions. However, the rank test is more sensitive to increases in the length of the event window, to increases in return variance, and to thin trading. The generalized sign test is a viable alternative to the rank test under these conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, Anup, and Gershon N. Mandelker, “dLarge Shareholders and the Monitoring of Managers: The Case of Antitakeover Charter Amendments.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25, 143–161 (1990).
Bernard, Victor L., “Capital Markets Research in Accounting During the 1980s: A Critical Review.” working paper, University of Michigan, 1989.
Brown, Stephen J., and Jerold B. Warner, “Measuring Security Price Performance.”Journal of Financial Economics 8, 205–258 (1980).
Brown, Stephen J., and Jerold B. Warner, “Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies.”Journal of Financial Economics 14, 3–31 (1985).
Chan, Su Han, John D. Martin, and John W. Kensinger, “Corporate Research and Development Expenditures and Share Value.”Journal of Financial Economics 26(2), 255–276 (1990).
Cowan, Arnold R., Nandkumar Nayar, and Ajai K. Singh, “Stock Returns Before and After Calls of Convertible Bonds.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25, 549–554 (1990).
Corrado, Charles J., “A Nonparametric Test for Abnormal Security-Price Performance in Event Studies.”Journal of Financial Economics 23, 385–395 (1989).
David, H.A., H.O. Hartley, and E.S. Pearson, “The Distribution of the Ratio, in a Single Normal Sample, of Range to Standard Deviation.”Biometrika 61, 482–493 (1954).
Doukas, John, and Nickolaos G. Travlos, “The Effect of Corporate Multinationalism on Shareholders' Wealth: Evidence from International Acquisitions.”Journal of Finance 43(5), 1161–1175 (1988).
Fama, Eugene F.,Foundations of Finance. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1976.
Hite, Gailen L., and Michael R. Vetsuypens, “Management Buyouts of Divisions and Shareholder Wealth.”Journal of Finance 44(4), 953–970 (1989).
Jarrell, Gregg A., and Annette B. Poulsen, “Dual-class Recapitalization as Antitakeover Mechanisms: The Recent Evidence.”Journal of Financial Economics 20(1/2) 129–152 (1988).
Kim, E. Han, and John D. Schatzberg, “Voluntary Corporate Liquidations,”Journal of Financial Economics 79(2), 311–328 (1987).
Kothari, S.P., and Charles E. Wasley, “Measuring Security Price Performance in Size-clustered Samples.”Accounting Review 64, 228–249 (1989).
Loderer, Claudio, and Kenneth Martin, “Corporate Acquisitions by Listed Firms:” The Experience of a Comprehensive Sample.”Financial Management 19(4), 17–33 (1990).
McWilliams, Victoria B., “Managerial Share Ownership and the Stock Price Effects of Antitakeover Amendment Proposals.”Journal of Finance 45(5), 1627–1640 (1990).
Neave, Henry R., and P.L. Worthington,Distribution-free Tests. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988.
Ryngaert, Michael, “The Effect of Poison Pill Securities on Shareholder Wealth,”Journal of Financial Economics 20(1/2), 377–417 (1988).
Sanger, Gary C., and James D. Peterson, “An Empirical Analysis of Common Stock Delistings”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25(2), 261–272 (1990).
Schipper, Katherine, and Abbie Smith, “Effects of Recontracting on Shareholder Wealth: The Case of Voluntary Spin-offs.”Journal of Financial Economics, 437–467 (1983).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cowan, A.R. Nonparametric event study tests. Rev Quant Finan Acc 2, 343–358 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939016
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939016