Skip to main content
Log in

Pollination disruption by European honeybees in the Australian bird-pollinated shrubGrevillea barklyana (Proteaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

European honeybees (Apis mellifera) were less efficient pollinators ofGrevillea barklyana than nectar-feeding birds. Nectar-collecting honeybees did not contact reproductive parts of flowers. Pollen-collecting honeybees preferentially visited malestage flowers but rarely visited female-stage flowers. Fruit set on caged inflorescences that allowed access to honeybees but excluded birds was reduced by more than 50% compared to inflorescences that were visited by both types of visitors. Further, fruit set on caged inflorescences was less than on bagged inflorescences that excluded both birds and honeybees, indicating that pollen removal by bees decreased opportunities for delayed autonomous selfing in the absence of birds. Although fruit set was not pollen-limited at the study site, pollen removal by honeybees would decrease fruit set in small populations where birds are scarce. In addition, pollen removal by honeybees would reduce opportunities for outcrossing and reproductive success through male function. Although honeybees have been in Australia for insufficient time to have exerted selection on floral traits, evolutionary shifts in response to these animals are likely to occur in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayre, D. J., Whelan, R. J., 1989: Factors controlling fruit set in hermaphroditic plants: studies with the AustralianProteaceae. — Trends Ecol. Evol.4: 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994: Unexpectedly high levels of selfing in the Australian shrubGrevillea barklyana (Proteaceae). — Heredity72: 168–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, R. I., 1982: Floral biology, hummingbird pollination and fruit production of trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans, Bignoniaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.69: 122–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, H. W., Brown, W. L., 1979: The exploitation of floral nectar inEucalyptus incrassata by honeyeaters and honeybees. — Oecologia44: 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, D., Charlesworth, B., 1987: Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.18: 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. G., Rebelo, T., 1987: Pollination biology of theProteaceae in Australia and southern Africa. — Austral. J. Ecol.12: 387–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Nectar utilization and pollination by Australian honeyeaters and insects visitingCalothamnus quadrifidus (Myrtaceae). — Austral. J. Ecol.9: 353–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, M. D., 1994: Evolution of bird-pollination in some Australian legumes (Fabaceae). — InEggleton, P., Vane-Wright, R. I., (Eds): Phylogenetics and ecology, pp. 281–309. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger, P., 1983: Coevolution and pollination. — InFutuyma, D. J., Statkin, M., (Eds): Coevolution, pp. 282–310. — Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, H. A., 1985: Nectarivory and pollination by birds in southern Australia and Europe. — Oikos44: 127–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979: Birds as pollinators of Australian plants. — New Zealand Bot.17: 509–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuss, A. M., Sedgley, M., 1991: Pollen tube growth and seed set ofBanksia coccinea R. Br. (Proteaceae). — Ann. Bot. (London)68: 377–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder, L. D., Barrett, S. C. H., 1993: Pollen removal from tristylousPontederia cordanta: Effects of anther position and pollinator specialization. — Ecology74: 1059–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, F., Whelan, R. J., 1993: Selective fruit abortion inGrevillea barklyana (Proteaceae). — Austral. J. Bot.41: 499–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C. M., 1987: Components of pollinator “quality”: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. — Oikos50: 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, C. A., Inouye, D. W., 1993: Techniques for pollination biologists. — Niwot: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, P. G., 1994: Pollen presenters in the flowering plants-form and function. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.115: 165–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, B., 1982: The reproductive biology ofGrevillea leucopteris (Proteaceae), including reference to its glandular hairs and colonizing potential. — Flora172: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. G., Schoen, D. J., 1992: Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. — Int. J. Pl. Sci.153: 358–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDade, L. A., Kinsman, S., 1980: The impact of floral parasitism in two neotropical hummingbird-pollinated plant species. — Evolution34: 944–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, D. J., 1993:Grevillea: revision of the genusGrevillea. — Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, D. C., 1986: Evolution of bird pollination in Australia. — InFord, H. A., Paton, D. C., (Eds): The dynamic partnership: birds and plants in southern Australia, pp. 32–41. — Adelaide: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: Honeybees in the Australian environment. — BioScience43: 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985: Pollination ofBanksia ericifolia Smith: birds, mammals and insects as pollen vectors. — Austral. J. Bot.33: 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, M. W., 1988a: Differences in pollinator effectiveness of birds and insects visitingBanksia menziesii (Proteaceae). — Oecologia76: 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988b: Floret opening inBanksia menziesii R. Br.: the importance of nectarivorous birds. — Austral. J. Bot.36: 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Ovule pre-emption and pollen limitation in a self-fertile perennial herb (Blandfordia grandiflora, Liliaceae). — Oecologia103: 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. W., 1992: The relationship between floral display size, pollen carryover and geitonogamy inMyosotis colensoi (Kirk)Macbride (Boraginaceae). — Biol. J. Linn. Soc.46: 333–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske, D. W., Horvitz, C. C., 1984: Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization. — Science225: 519–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J., 1981: Biometry, 2nd end. — New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G., Whelan, R. J., 1988: Can honeybees pollinateGrevillea? — Austral. Zool.24: 193–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughton, G., 1988: Pollination and seed set ofBanksia spinulosa: evidence for autogamy. — Austral. J. Bot.36: 633–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: Effectiveness of nectarivorous birds and honeybees as pollinators ofBanksia spinulosa (Proteaceae). — Austral. J. Ecol.17: 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: No evidence for selective fruit abortion in the Australian shrub,Grevillea barklyana (Proteaceae). — Int. J. Pl. Sci.156: 417–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N. M., 1979: Pollinator availability as a determinant of flowering time in Ocotillo (Fouquieria splendens). — Oecologia39: 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: Population structure, optimal outbreeding, and assortative mating in angiosperms. — InThornhill, N. W., (Ed.): The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding-theoretical and empirical perspectives, pp. 173–199. — Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerkamp, C., 1991: Honeybees are poor pollinators-why? — Pl. Syst. Evol.177: 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L., Hill, M., Vang, E., 1992: SYSTAT Statistics. — Evanston: SYSTAT Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P., Thomson, J. D., 1991: Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen. — Ecology72: 1503–1507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, P. F., 1993: Secondary pollen presentation. Form, function and evolution. — Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl. 6. — Wien, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaughton, G. Pollination disruption by European honeybees in the Australian bird-pollinated shrubGrevillea barklyana (Proteaceae). Pl Syst Evol 200, 89–100 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984750

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984750

Key words

Navigation