Skip to main content
Log in

Beliefs about cues associated with deception

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People's beliefs about the association of 19 visual and auditory cues with deception were assessed in one of two questionnaires: Subjects were asked to indicate the association of each cue with deception in their own behavior (self-perception condition) or in other people's behavior (other-perception condition). The 19 behaviors listed in the questionnaires had been previously examined in research on actual behaviors associated with deception; ten of these behaviors had also been examined in research on cues associated with judgment of deception. Stronger association between the various cues and deception were obtained in the other-perception than in the self-perception condition, indicating that people believe they control their own deceptive behavior better than other people control theirs. Beliefs about the association of each behavior with deception (averaged across the two conditions and sex of respondents) correlated .11 with the actual association of each cue with deception, and .44 with the association of each cue with judgment of deception. The possibility that the correspondence between beliefs about deception and actual cues to deception is higher for some specific types of lie-telling was discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References Notes

  • DePaulo, B.M., Rosenthal, R., Rosenkrantz, J., & Green, C.R. Actual and perceived cues to deception. Manuscript submitted for view, University of Virginia, 1981.

  • Krauss, R.M., Geller, V., & Olson, C. Modalities and cues in the detection of deception. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., September, 1976.

References

  • Cohen, J.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B.M., Lassiter, G.D., & Stone, J.I. Attentional determinants of success at detecting deception.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, in press.

  • Hemsley, G.D., & Doob, A.N. The effect of looking behaviors on perceptions of a communicator's credibility.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1978, 8, 136–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. Humans as lie detectors.Journal of Communication, 1980,30, 209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. Combining results of independent studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. The verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowtiz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 14, New York: Academic Press, in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R. & Driver, R. Beliefs about cues associated with deception. J Nonverbal Behav 6, 105–114 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987286

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987286

Keywords

Navigation